Channel
@e5tyarmsmenna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,101subscribers
-392 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001962413271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @e5tyarmsmenna |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/e5tyarmsmenna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 5,101 | -81 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:48 | 5,182 | -37 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 5,219 | -42 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 5,261 | -72 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 5,333 | -86 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 5,419 | -70 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 5,489 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 5,493 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
118 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 85.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 8.47% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رفقًا بقلبك .. لا تُهِمه بما هو آتٍ وتُقْلِقه وتُشقيه، لا تُحَسِّره على ما فات وتُحزِنه وتُضنيه، ولا تشغله بما يُنسيه ربه ويُلهيه، ولا تمدن عينيك إلى ما في يد غيرك وتَعِد قلبَك به وتُمَنِّيه ، ومِن حسن إسلام المرء -ومن رِفقه بقلبه «تركُه ما لا يعنيه».
❤15
Signed Menna
وبكدا الحمدلله نكون خلصنا اتمنى بكره كلكم تحلوا كويس إن شاء الله وتطمنونى عليكم ربنا معاكم ويوفقكم جميعا يا رب♥♥♥ إن شاء الله بكره تطمنونى عليكم ويجى لذيذ ويعوضكم عن الامتحانين اللى فاتوا هستناكم تطمنونى إن شاء الله 💗 والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته فى رعاية الله جميعا ♥♥ ودا يوزر البوت بتاعى لو حد محتاج حاجة فى اي وقت او لو قبل الامتحان @manoosh211180BOT
❤22❤🔥9🥰2
Signed Menna
شكل الامتحان
❤16
Signed Menna
جماعة دا لو اي موضوع عام زى الذكاء الاصطناعي، الامانة،وسائل التواصل الاجتماعى وهكذا انما لو قالك اكتب عن زيارة لبلد او اي مكان زورته فطبعا دا مش هينفع معاه الكلام دا انما هنقوله مثلا Last summer, I went to........... وبعدين افضل احكيله عن اللى حصل هناك والأنشطة اللى عملتها وهكذا يعنى فاهمينى
❤5
Signed Menna
تطبيق: «The advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence» No one can deny that artificial intelligence is a double-edged weapon. We should benefit from its pros and avoid its cons. To do this, we should do many things. First, we can use technology to gain information. Then, we can use robots to help us in our affairs. I think it is very important to improve humanity and achieve progress. On the other …
❤7
Signed Menna
كــيف تكتــب أي براجــراف بسهولـــه؟!👀 «نكتب اسم الموضوع» No one can deny that +(اسم الموضوع نستغله فى جملة ) We should always do that. To do this, We should do many things. First, (نكتب جملة متعلقة بالموضوع) Then, (نكتب جملة متعلقة بالموضوع ) I think it is very important............(نكتب جملة متعلقة بالموضوع ) On the other hand, we may face some difficulties......(جملة تقول فيها الصعوبات، جملة تقول فيها …
❤5❤🔥1🔥1
Signed Menna
File, posted without a caption
Signed Menna
File, posted without a caption
Signed Menna
I was .......... by Heba's .......... the initiative to support her community.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3💯1
Signed Menna
.......... the publication deadline, the editor will have the final draft professionally proofread this evening.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3👀1
Signed Menna
In a/an .......... essay, the writer should use strong evidence to convince the reader of a point.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Signed Menna
Which of the following forms corrects the two mistakes in this sentence?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4🌚1
Signed Menna
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @e5tyarmsmenna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
I was .......... by Heba's .......... the initiative to support her community.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
.......... the publication deadline, the editor will have the final draft professionally proofread this evening.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In a/an .......... essay, the writer should use strong evidence to convince the reader of a point.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following forms corrects the two mistakes in this sentence?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which sentence is correctly structured?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which sentence is correctly punctuated?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لغة إنجليزية ٣ ث مس منه” (@e5tyarmsmenna), 5,101 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e5tyarmsmenna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.