Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DZAPK.COM πŸ”₯

Channel

DZAPK.COM πŸ”₯

@dzapk_dz

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

12,972subscribers

+92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002544401132
TypeChannel
Username@dzapk_dz
Created19 May 2025 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dzapk_dz

Growth

12,85612,97212,9147 August 2026 β€” 12,880 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 12,875 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 12,876 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 12,875 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 12,876 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 12,870 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 12,879 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 12,876 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 12,869 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 12,872 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 12,865 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 12,860 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 12,856 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 12,857 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 12,869 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 12,891 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 12,888 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 12,885 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 12,889 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 12,901 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 12,915 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 12,919 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 12,946 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 12,960 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 12,955 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 12,952 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 12,972 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net +92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,839–12,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 13:3712,972+20
4 Sept 2026, 01:5512,952-3
2 Sept 2026, 17:4412,955-5
1 Sept 2026, 16:3512,960+14
31 Aug 2026, 13:1312,946+27
30 Aug 2026, 11:4812,919+4
29 Aug 2026, 13:4312,915+14
28 Aug 2026, 17:0512,901+12
27 Aug 2026, 13:4912,889+4
26 Aug 2026, 15:2912,885-3
25 Aug 2026, 18:5212,888-3
24 Aug 2026, 15:5612,891+22
23 Aug 2026, 00:2312,869+12
21 Aug 2026, 13:5412,857+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:3612,856-4
19 Aug 2026, 11:1612,860-5
18 Aug 2026, 14:4612,865-7
17 Aug 2026, 14:1412,872+3
16 Aug 2026, 03:5612,869-7
14 Aug 2026, 14:5712,876first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 19 May 2025 β€” the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

632 reactions across 1 post, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀27743.8%
πŸ‘20832.9%
πŸ₯°568.86%
πŸ‘467.28%
πŸ”₯253.96%
😁203.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 632 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 20 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 May 2025, 22:53 UTCβ‰ˆ92,200 views632 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

πŸ’₯ ΩŠΩ…ΩƒΩ†Ωƒ Ψ§Ω„Ψ§Ω†ΨΆΩ…Ψ§Ω… Ψ₯Ω„Ω‰ Ω‚Ω†Ψ§ΨͺΩ†Ψ§ Ψ§Ω„Ψ±Ψ¦ΩŠΨ³ΩŠΨ© Ω…Ω† Ω‡Ω†Ψ§ πŸ‘‡ https://t.me/dzapk_com_official https://t.me/dzapk_com_official https://t.me/dzapk_com_official

❀277πŸ‘208πŸ₯°56πŸ‘46πŸ”₯25😁20

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @dzapk_dz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œDZAPK.COM πŸ”₯” (@dzapk_dz), 12,972 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dzapk_dz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.