Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Du Rove's Chat

Supergroup

Du Rove's Chat

@durovschat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

9,777members

+19 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

617 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001256902287
TypeSupergroup
Username@durovschat
Created30 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/durovschat

Growth

9,7589,8249,7915 August 2026 — 9,758 members9 August 2026 — 9,778 members12 August 2026 — 9,815 members16 August 2026 — 9,824 members18 August 2026 — 9,760 members21 August 2026 — 9,770 members23 August 2026 — 9,770 members25 August 2026 — 9,777 members9,7775 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,748–9,834 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
25 Aug 2026, 04:029,777+7
23 Aug 2026, 10:559,770no change
21 Aug 2026, 20:579,770+10
18 Aug 2026, 19:369,760-64
16 Aug 2026, 05:489,824+9
12 Aug 2026, 07:069,815+37
9 Aug 2026, 09:519,778+20
5 Aug 2026, 22:019,758first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 23 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 863 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

List of security issues associated with Telegram (en.wikipedia.org)
“…|title=Durov's Chat |url=https://t.me/durovschat/515221 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112075204/https://t.me/durovschat/515221 |archive-date=12…”
read 23 August 2026

Hacker News

This handle was named 8 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Du Rove's Chat” (@durovschat), 9,777 members as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/durovschat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.