12 measurements spanning 15 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,984–11,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 14:08
10,987
-6
21 Aug 2026, 05:08
10,993
+1
19 Aug 2026, 07:39
10,992
-3
18 Aug 2026, 10:33
10,995
-4
15 Aug 2026, 18:44
10,999
-2
14 Aug 2026, 07:05
11,001
-4
12 Aug 2026, 20:13
11,005
+1
11 Aug 2026, 21:12
11,004
+2
9 Aug 2026, 18:12
11,002
-2
8 Aug 2026, 21:11
11,004
-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:47
11,007
-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:45
11,008
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
46.9%
avg views ÷ 10,987 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,150
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
23 (27 July 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
118,560
Reactions total
9,126
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,200
Videos
≈413
Links
≈141
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
2m 55s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,126 reactions across 23 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,206
35.1%
custom 5235695417361966934
2,496
27.4%
❤🔥
776
8.50%
custom 5249311859554657388
624
6.84%
💅
447
4.90%
💔
322
3.53%
😍
293
3.21%
🥰
290
3.18%
custom 5249227639540953761
231
2.53%
🔥
137
1.50%
😁
92
1.01%
🕊
57
0.625%
👍
44
0.482%
😱
37
0.405%
💘
21
0.23%
🙏
13
0.142%
🤝
10
0.11%
😭
9
0.099%
🌭
5
0.055%
👎
5
0.055%
5 further kinds
11
0.121%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dssahs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Женский пост.
Как обладатель стайлера Дайсон я делаю на него укладки используя одну насадку (цилиндр). И вот я устала от стайлера, и как обладатель фена Дайсон а так же брашингов, купленных мной из принципа чтобы не покупать стайлер, я решила разнообразить свою жизнь и поукладываться на браш. К сожалению укладке на браш я научилась тоже из принципа, чтобы не покупать стайлер. Стайлер же я купила исходя из принципа чт…
Опа ГРУМИНГ ПРОЦЕДУРЫ.
3 месяца назад я пришла к своему мастеру Рашиду и говорю «Хочу стрижку лисий хвост. Пошел в жопу прямой срез» он кивнул и сделал мой запрос. Прошло время и я поняла… что хочу прямой срез. Лысый (лисий) хвост меня не устраивает, концы слишком тонкие на такой длине!! Поэтому я пришла на днях в любимые Ma and Mi, где я стригусь уже лет 6 прости господи, подошла к Рашиду и сказала «Теперь делаем пр…
Сходить в кино после завода, что может быть лучше?
А лучше может быть только сходить в кино после завода в чудесной компании. 💖
Посетила премьеру фильма «Жертва обстоятельств».
Фильм как мне подумалось про пустого мужчину без личности, и наполненную шизофреническими идеями женщину, которые встречаются.. а дальше увидите сами! Без спойлеров.
Так же в этом фильме дебютирует в качестве актера Йонатан Арон Хостад (в прос…
Пью таблетки для сна. Пока что засыпаю все равно в 4 утра.
За три дня без Синабонов и Сабвея я сбросила вес. 🥺 Теперь с меня падают браслеты, но мы держимся. В планах хотя бы неделя правильного питания. Для очистки организма.
А потом возвращение в сахарное безумие.
Была у меня столешница из ДСП. Казалось бы, такие вещи должны весить не много. Но эта столешница была собрана из опилок самого тяжелого дерева в мире и бетона как будто. Весила она 23кг плюс минус. Столешница была побита жизнью и разваливалась в местах крепления к ножкам. Я купила новую из массива, а эту поставила стоять в коридор. Так как вынести ее на мусорку (она в метрах 100 от дома) возможным мне не представляло…
Люди, которые в такую погоду ходят в шортах и футболке, скажите честно: вы по вечерам в огромного волка превращаетесь? Или греете там в скалистых, снежных горах своим теплом умирающую девушку влюбленную не в вас, а в нарцисса с блестками на коже?
Вы не стесняйтесь! Говорите как есть, мы не осудим.
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @dssahs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dsahs” (@dssahs), 10,987 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dssahs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
