Channel
@dsj886688
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25,200subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001418847281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsj886688 |
| Description | 东南亚华人新闻速递｜实时热点｜本地突发｜行业内幕 主打柬埔寨，覆盖#菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #迪拜 #泰国 #缅甸 每天整理最真实、最快速的华人资讯，拒绝标题党。 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsj886688 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1.3 average views per post against 25,200 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.005%. Across the 2,712 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,007–31,602 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.71% and 10.9%, with a median of 4.29%.
| Window | 30 days (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 348 of 348 published in the window (348 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 446 |
| Mature posts only | 0.004% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 25,200 measured 29 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:zho · 2,712 channels · p10 0.545% · p25 1.71% · p50 4.29% · p75 10.9% · p90 22.7% |
| Position in cohort | 0.000th percentile · 1/1000 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.115% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 99.7%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 29 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 25,200 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 25,201 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 25,200 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 25,200 | first reading |
355 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 355 (7 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 455 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 112 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
洪玛奈再下严令：彻底清剿网诈残余势力 绝不姑息 昨天上午，柬埔寨总理洪玛奈在内阁全体会议上，向全国各级执法部队再次下达严格指令，要求继续不遗余力、绝不姑息地严厉打击网络诈骗犯罪网络。 根据会后新闻通报，洪玛奈对各级政府及执法部门此前在网诈专项打击行动中取得的重大成效给予高度肯定与感谢。同时他强调，尽管已取得阶段性成果，各级执法机关仍须保持高压态势，坚决铲除境内残余的诈骗团伙。 频道广告赞助商 🤪 ——————————————— 🔝认准澳门新葡京 无限奖励 🔝缅甸MMK平台 SUN6.com 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#缅甸资讯 🇲🇲缅甸仰光被曝出现电诈网络转移迹象，部分中国籍人员疑通过本地身份掩护经营 8月29日，缅甸媒体《仰光新时代》援引军方消息人士、商界人士及曾在相关场所工作者称， 部分此前活跃于妙瓦底及掸邦北部的中国籍电诈从业者，近期疑转移至仰光，并通过取得以“12/”开头的仰光地区身份证件、户籍资料等方式掩盖真实身份。 报道指称，一些人员过去曾持有克伦邦“3/”或掸邦“13/”开头证件，如今被曝支付数千万至数亿缅元取得仰光地区身份资料，并以酒店、KTV、酒吧、语言学校、电脑培训机构等合法生意作为掩护，在莱达雅、达梅、巴汉等地继续经营网络诈骗及赌博活动。 消息人士还点名多家仰光酒店及住宅区，声称部分场所表面客流有限、内部人员管理封闭，却可能存在电诈或赌场业务； 同时有人指控相关网络长期向地方行政、警察、军方及移民部门人员支付“保护费”。 报道认为，随着妙瓦底等边境地区持续开展反诈清查，电诈网络可能正由大型园区向仰光等城市分…
#网友投稿：金三角特区“鑫景国际”，昨天刚查完一遍，刚刚治安局又过来突击检查，逐户敲门进入房间检查，看有没有手机电脑及违禁品，还在特内的兄弟们，现在风头还没有过，这几天务必小心！ 频道广告赞助商 🤪 ——————————————— 🔝认准澳门新葡京 无限奖励 🔝缅甸MMK平台 SUN6.com 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
中国女游客泰国遇险！绑匪手机惊现多人被捆照 泰国警方在调查一名中国女游客遭绑架案时，从嫌疑人手机中发现多张中国游客被捆绑的照片，疑点重重——她可能不是唯一受害者。 照片中数名中国人双手被捆，处境与29岁获救女子相似，部分信息还涉及泰国大城府。警方正核实照片是否与本案有关，已扩大调查范围。 泰国警方高层已介入，要求彻查人员招募、资金流向、通信记录等，不排除涉及人口贩运。 该女子最初因一名中国女子的邀约前往新加坡，对方称“到泰国看工作”，并包机票住宿。不料抵达后，她被一家泰国人接机、换车、包围、控制，最终遭绑架。 8月23日深夜，车辆驶入甘烹碧市区时，女子试图求救，司机冲卡逃跑，警方随即展开追捕。 频道广告赞助商 🤪 ——————————————— 🔝认准澳门新葡京 无限奖励 🔝缅甸MMK平台 SUN6.com 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#网友投稿：缅甸佤邦惊现“蜘蛛侠”！高空走钢丝、飞檐走壁，动作行云流水，胆量直接拉满！ 频道广告赞助商 🤪 ——————————————— 🔝认准澳门新葡京 无限奖励 🔝缅甸MMK平台 SUN6.com 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#国内资讯： 深圳8月反诈再收紧 一个月刑拘涉诈黑灰产嫌疑人1900余人 深圳市公安局8月27日公布最新反诈专项战果。8月以来，深圳警方在全市持续打击涉诈黑灰产，截至通报时，已刑事拘留相关嫌疑人1900余人。 本轮行动重点清理为电信网络诈骗提供帮助的本地黑灰产业链，打击方向包括为诈骗活动提供技术、资金、通信等支撑的相关犯罪。 深圳此前也连续开展同类专项行动。5月刑拘涉诈黑灰产嫌疑人1218人，6月刑拘1700余人，8月最新通报人数已经超过1900人，打击力度继续加大。 频道广告赞助商 🤪 ——————————————— 🔝认准澳门新葡京 无限奖励 🔝缅甸MMK平台 SUN6.com 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包 😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#丹麦新闻 丹麦端掉亿元奢侈品洗钱网络，13名中国籍人士被捕，名包名表成洗钱工具 丹麦警方8月26日在西兰岛多地展开突袭，共抓获14人，其中13人为中国籍、1人为丹麦籍。这个网络涉嫌通过奢侈品交易洗钱超过1亿丹麦克朗，另外还涉及约2400万丹麦克朗增值税欺诈。 这伙人主要购买名牌手袋、名表等高价商品，再通过转卖把犯罪资金包装成正常交易收入。部分商品由他人代购，之后卖给丹麦境内外买家，让资金流向更难追查。 案件牵出哥本哈根市中心两家奢侈品店，其中两名店员涉嫌配合销售，并在发票上填写虚假买家姓名和地址。部分涉案人员再以商品卖往境外为由申请退税，骗取约2400万丹麦克朗增值税。 8月27日，其中11人被带到哥本哈根地方法院接受拘押审查，4男7女均否认指控。警方调查还发现，部分人员涉嫌经营地下钱庄和现金兑换业务，相关洗钱金额至少180万丹麦克朗。 这起案件从可疑资金交易入手，警方持续调查约一年后集中收网，并在搜查中扣押大笔现金…
#telegram：解双向，限制群组发言教程 👉第一步：打开 @spambot 👉第二步：点击 Start 👉第三步：点击This is a mistake 👉第四部：点击yes 👉第五步：点击 No,I'll never do any of this! 👉第六步：回复 I have no idea, I have always been very abiding by the use of telegram. It's just that there are too many malicious people in my peers who maliciously complained about me. 一般几个小时就恢复了 *会员*帐号秒解双向限制教程： 1.Telegram 搜索栏搜索：Spam Info Bot 也可点击 @SpamBot 开始对话，并按顺序点击以下内容 2. /start 3. OK 4.…
张继科“借贷门”背后，居然藏着“柬埔寨最大的赌博集团”？ 这两天，有博主爆料，向张继科讨债的神秘债主S先生，根本就不是真债主，而是一个“叠码仔”，拉客去澳门地区、东南亚那边的赌博场所玩博彩游戏。 据爆料信息，张继科2018年与债主在境外赌场相识，于2019年与债主签订借款合同。而早年间粉丝晒出的张继科行程图显示，其曾在2019年多次往返北京与金边。 有人综合推测，张继科或许是前往金边赌博。而金边只有一家合规赌场——金界娱乐城（Naga World），其他赌场都距离金边200公里以外开设。 据此推测，张继科去金边赌博的场所，可能是港股上市公司金界控股旗下的金界娱乐城。 而这家赌场背后的老板，是马来西亚华裔、“柬埔寨赌王”曾立强，祖籍广东东莞。2022年，曾立强以27亿美元财富，位列《福布斯2022年马来西亚富豪榜》第7名。此外，他还被赐封“丹斯里”头衔，可以说是一个有头有脸的人物。 曾立强创立的金界娱乐城，是柬埔寨最大…
#泰国资讯 泰国严查代持再升级：70家企业面临撤销！103名中国籍董事股东被逐一核查？ 据泰媒8月27日报道，泰国沙功那空府升级打击外国资本利用泰国人“代持”（Nominee）注册企业的行动。 目前当地共有70家公司被发现存在异常迹象，相关部门已完成初步证据整理，并将进一步核查公司背后的外国资本网络；其中，公司注册文件涉及的103名中国籍董事及股东，已被移民部门列入身份和居留情况核查范围。 8月27日，沙功那空府府尹Ranida Lueangthitissakun主持专项会议，召集商业、警方、移民、地方行政等部门，跟进打击“冒用他人身份为外国资本注册法人企业”的行动，并部署刑事追查及预防措施。 沙功那空府商业办公室此前分两批发现异常企业，第一批49家、第二批21家，共计70家公司。目前相关证据已整理完毕，主管部门正向公司董事及股东发函，要求其说明公司注册和经营情况。 按照报道，相关人员获得15天期限作出解释；如果期限届满…
#国内新闻 武汉江夏警方及时拦截56万元涉诈现金 8月25日，武汉市江夏区公安分局反诈中心接到紧急预警：一名群众疑似遭遇电信诈骗，准备在线下商场交付大额现金。民警迅速赶赴现场布控，成功抓获前来取款的诈骗团伙成员，当场查获涉案现金56万元，并于当日将钱款全额返还受害人。 当天10时许，江夏公安反诈中心接到预警，得知有群众可能被诱导在线下交付现金。民警杜杨、何园立即带队赶赴相关地点开展排查。 在现场蹲守过程中，一名戴口罩、背双肩包的男子引起民警注意。该男子长时间在商场周边徘徊观望，反复查看手机，却迟迟没有进入商场。民警结合前期线索进行比对后，确认其为诈骗团伙安排的“取手”，而按照对方要求将车辆停至指定地点的车主，正是受骗群众徐女士。 12时14分，嫌疑人从徐女士手中接过现金包裹，准备转身离开。埋伏在周边的便衣民警迅速展开抓捕，将其当场控制，并查获涉案现金56万元。 经查，徐女士此前在网上炒股时，被陌生网友诱导进入虚假投资平…
#巴基斯坦资讯：卡拉奇跨国网络诈骗案宣判：34名被告获刑18个月并处罚金 近日，卡拉奇南区司法裁判官对一起跨国网络诈骗案件作出判决，包括15名中国公民和19名巴基斯坦公民在内的34名被告，均被判处18个月监禁，并处罚金10万巴基斯坦卢比。 据悉，该案源于巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局（NCCIA）于2025年12月在卡拉奇DHA第1期和第6期展开的一次执法行动。 行动期间，执法人员查获37台电脑、40部手机、超过1万张国际SIM卡以及6套非法通信网关。调查显示，涉案团伙涉嫌利用Telegram群组及虚假投资平台，通过展示虚构投资收益等方式，诱导巴基斯坦及其他国家的受害者参与所谓的加密货币、外汇等投资项目。 执法部门当时估计，该团伙涉及的相关交易金额约为6000万美元。 法院审理后认定，涉案的15名中国公民和19名巴基斯坦公民参与了相关网络诈骗活动，并依法作出上述判决。 为何此次案件由巴基斯坦法院判处监禁？ 与近期巴基斯…
Showing the 12 most recent of 355 posts we hold for @dsj886688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件” (@dsj886688), 25,200 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsj886688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.