Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Drip ID

Channel

Drip ID

@drip_id0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,816subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719366199
TypeChannel
Username@drip_id0
Description✈️ Доставляем любимые бренды из-за рубежа — без переплат и головной боли 🤖 Чат-бот для расчёта заказов - @dripid_bot 📦 Оформить заказ - @dripID 📓 Отзывы о нашей работе - @dripidfeedback 🛫 Договор оферты - https://drip-id.ru/agent-contract
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drip_id0

Growth

13,78013,82413,8027 August 2026 — 13,802 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,802 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,803 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,796 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,799 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,796 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,786 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,780 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,788 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,795 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,812 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,816 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,824 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,821 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,816 subscribers13,8167 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,773–13,831 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 06:1813,816-5
20 Aug 2026, 20:5513,821-3
19 Aug 2026, 21:0613,824+8
18 Aug 2026, 17:4313,816+4
17 Aug 2026, 18:2713,812+17
16 Aug 2026, 14:3813,795+7
14 Aug 2026, 20:3413,788+8
13 Aug 2026, 13:1713,780-6
12 Aug 2026, 12:0813,786-10
11 Aug 2026, 10:4313,796-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:1113,799+3
9 Aug 2026, 07:5213,796-7
8 Aug 2026, 05:5913,803+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:0013,802no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:5013,802first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.38%
avg views ÷ 13,816 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total23,154
Reactions total367
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,450
Videos
22
Links
495

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

367 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9826.7%
🔥8723.7%
❤‍🔥8623.4%
🤩267.08%
🥰195.18%
👍154.09%
👏123.27%
🙏82.18%
🫡82.18%
😍30.817%
🤝20.545%
💘10.272%
😐10.272%
🤨10.272%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC761 views15 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥64🤩2🔥1🤝1🫡1

19 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC924 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

😏 CROCS ВЕРНУЛ НАС В ДЕТСТВО К 20-летию «Тачек» Молния Маккуин наконец получил тот самый голубой окрас Dinoco, о котором мечтал в первом мультфильме 🥰 На месте всё самое важное: номер 95, динозавр на носке, фирменная улыбка и огромный спойлер сзади 😗 Кроксы «Молния Маккуин Dinoco» — 13990 Релиз состоится 16 сентября 📌 Хотите получить пару одними из первых? Напишите нашему менеджеру — оформим предзаказ ▶️ Получит

❤‍🔥103👍2🔥2👏1

18 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,190 views25 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥11🔥6🤩51👍1🫡1

18 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,000 views24 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥8🤩5🙏54❤‍🔥1👏1

18 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,070 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026

❓ Все уже послушали Илью? Тогда несколько важных деталей 👇 Все текущие тарифы остаются в силе, а новым тарифом ускоренной доставки из США можно пользоваться уже сейчас: ➖ при расчёте прямо в боте ➖ при оформлении через менеджера 📌 Этот тариф подходит для всех товаров и всех видов посылок, даже для санкционных! Чуть дороже — но заказ едет к вам ощутимо быстрее!

🔥8🥰5❤‍🔥32👏1

15 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,440 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

👚 Хочу Miu Miu, могу — массмаркет Собрали пять вещей от Miu Miu и визуально похожие альтернативы из массмаркета Выбирайте свой вариант ➡️ 👜 Сумка ХОЧУ: сумка Arcadie от Miu Miu — 331990 МОГУ: сумка Bette от Urban Outfitters — 4990 🩰 Замшевые балетки ХОЧУ: балетки Miu Miu — 116990 МОГУ: балетки Zara — 8490 🩶 Серый кардиган ХОЧУ: кашемировый кардиган Miu Miu — 203590 МОГУ: кардиган Massimo Dutti — 9990 👕 Поло ХОЧУ

❤‍🔥8🔥6🤩3👍1🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,350 views20 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🪄 ЭТОТ LEGO ЗАХОТЯТ ДАЖЕ МАГГЛЫ В честь 25-летия вселенной Гарри Поттера LEGO выпускает коллекционный набор «Министерство магии» — и, кажется, мы уже знаем, куда исчезнет наша зарплата 😶 В наборе 3 491 деталь, 14 минифигурок и сразу несколько локаций: от телефонной будки и кабинета Долорес Амбридж до зала суда и Отдела тайн 🤩 LEGO «Министерство магии™ – Коллекционное издание» — 61990 Релиз 1 сентября — принимаем

❤‍🔥95😍3👏1🔥1🤩1

13 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,270 views16 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🎨 ТАКОГО БОЛЬШЕ НИ У КОГО НЕ БУДЕТ! Зачем искать «ту самую» вещь в магазинах, если можно собрать её самому, заказать по своей идее или найти уникальный кастом? 👇 Собрали сайты, где это можно сделать: 🦴Beauty Bird Vintage — винтажные Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Dior, Chanel и Prada превращают в новые сумки, украшения и аксессуары 🦴Racoon Lab — готовые кастомы: Birkenstock в коровьем принте и дениме, модели Nike, Adidas,

8🔥3❤‍🔥2👍1👏1🤩1

12 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,300 views14 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🍄ЭТА СУМКА БУКВАЛЬНО ЖИВАЯ! В соцсетях разлетелись изображения культовой Coperni Swipe Bag с живой плесенью внутри. Но всё не так то просто... 😳 Проект представила диджитал-художница как неофициальную коллаборацию с Coperni Часть изображений создали с помощью нейросетей, а процесс изготовления показали только для одного экземпляра Пока «живая» сумка остаётся загадкой — выбрали три необычные Coperni,которые можно к

6🔥3👍2👏1🤩1😐1

11 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,300 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

😳 ПОПОЛАМЩИКИ, ОБЩИЙ СБОР! Бренды распродают летние коллекции, а значит, пора доставать то, что вы сохраняли в избранное Собралискидки, с которыми можно купить всё заполцены 👇 🤍 I.AM.GIA — доп. скидка до 75% на подборку товаров от бренда 🤍 Nike — доп. скидка 25% на подборку товаров от бренда 🤍 Charlotte Tilbury — доп. скидка до 30% на комбо-наборы бестселлеров бренда 🤍 Vans — доп. скидка 40% практически на весь

❤‍🔥85🙏3👏1🔥1🤝1

10 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,190 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🤨 ДОСТАВКА ЗА 3 ДНЯ — ЭТО НЕ ОПЕЧАТКА Нашли идеальный подарок в последний момент? Или просто хотите получить заказ как можно скорее? Теперь заказ можно получить уже за несколько дней! ✈️ Ускоренная авиадоставка из Китая в Россию занимает от 3 до 7 дней — срок отсчитывается с момента поступления заказа на наш склад в Китае Да, такой вариант стоит дороже обычной доставки, зато отлично подходит, когда покупка нужна с

🔥84🥰3❤‍🔥1👏1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drip_id0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 283,540 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Drip ID” (@drip_id0), 13,816 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drip_id0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.