Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dreams and Robots

Channel

Dreams and Robots

@dreamsrobots

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,869subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001711396510
TypeChannel
Username@dreamsrobots
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dreamsrobots

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,7772,8742,825.57 August 2026 — 2,784 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,784 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,783 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,782 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,780 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,777 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,779 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,778 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,861 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,864 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,867 subscribers2 October 2026 — 2,874 subscribers9 October 2026 — 2,869 subscribers2,8697 August 20269 October 2026
13 measurements spanning 63 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,762–2,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 05:362,869-5
2 Oct 2026, 09:162,874+7
16 Sept 2026, 19:402,867+3
13 Sept 2026, 07:002,864+3
9 Sept 2026, 15:172,861+83
4 Sept 2026, 17:162,778-1
31 Aug 2026, 22:142,779+2
19 Aug 2026, 12:372,777-3
16 Aug 2026, 21:382,780-2
13 Aug 2026, 18:062,782-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:452,783-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:022,784no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:532,784first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

409 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18745.7%
👍9723.7%
❤6816.6%
💯153.67%
🤣112.69%
🥱112.69%
👌30.733%
👎30.733%
🤔30.733%
👨‍💻20.489%
🤮20.489%
⚡10.244%
🌭10.244%
👻10.244%
👾10.244%
😁10.244%
🤡10.244%
🤨10.244%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2024 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 May 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,150 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сделал тут музыкальное видео вам на потеху. https://youtu.be/frazbclSzyc

🔥12

1 Apr 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,080 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вайб-кодеры есть? Мне тут пришла мысль, что если ты умеешь грамотно проектировать архитектуру приложения, то можешь неплохо экономить деньги. Начиная с банальных принципов SOLID, потом всякие там MV*-архитектуры и паттерны проектирования - всё то, что взрослые программисты обычно используют для поддерживаемости и расширяемости кода, - оказывается даёт выгоду с неожиданной, чисто финансовой, стороны. Когда у тебя в…

💯13❤7🔥3

21 Mar 2026, 07:53 UTC≈2,030 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы пользуетесь Обсидианом и Кодексом, то ловите лайфхак. Можно открыть папку документов Обсидиана прямо в Кодексе (например через VS Code с расширением) и безо всяких агентов и оплаты за токены работать с документами. Кодекс отлично понимает MarkDown, он правильно форматирует текст, ставит кросс-ссылки и даже рисует схемы в Mermaid. Можно редактировать, добавлять ссылки и хэштеги, можно менять структуру проект…

👍20🔥11❤3🌭1👾1

5 Feb 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,150 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В 2019 году, до всех этих ваших нейросетей, Сергей Кулинкович, арт-директор студии Лебедева, выдал на бизнес-линче вот такую базу.

👍13❤6🥱5💯2

24 Jan 2026, 15:56 UTC≈2,580 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥7👍2🤔2🤡1🤨1

24 Jan 2026, 15:56 UTC≈2,140 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У нас есть Suno дома. Suno дома: ... Хм, действительно, есть. Тестирую новую китайскую модель HeartMuLa для генерации песен, и она иногда выдаёт достойные результаты. Плюсы: - Open-source (а значит скоро будут и Лоры и всё остальное). - Уже есть нода для Комфи. - Неплохо генерирует голос и мелодию. - Мультиязычная, знает русский. - Никаких фильтров на текст. Минусы: - Небольшой датасет с ограниченным числом жанров…

🔥11👍3❤1

13 Jan 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,950 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣11❤8🔥5👍4

13 Jan 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,950 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В сентябре 2024 года я попросил GPT сделать трехмерные модели в формате Obj. По сути он должен был текстом набросать координаты вертексов и соединить их в полигоны. Получилось, откровенно говоря, не очень. Вот тут был пост об этом, если вы пропустили: https://t.me/dreamsrobots/218 В январе 2026 результаты уже немного другие. Ловите ёлочку и котика. Если вы не впечатлены, то прикладываю Obj-файл, можете открыть его…

🔥5❤4

29 Dec 2025, 11:10 UTC≈2,330 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я долго вынашивал идею поста про перспективы программирования и вайб-кодинг вообще, а Ютуб взял и подкинул видео, в котором мои путаные мысли уже разложены по полочкам и озвучены. Посмотрите обязательно, особенно если не являетесь программистами. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIKYXFIRIkI Главная мысль: сейчас программисты получают возможность вообще перестать общаться с людьми и в кайф заниматься чистыми техноло…

👍25❤4👎1🔥1

16 Dec 2025, 20:06 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 7 August 2026

Поменялось ли ваше мнение об ИИ-искусстве (живописи, музыке, видео) и о формах, которые оно принимает, за прошедший год? anonymous poll Нет, ничего не поменялось – 140 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 42% Да, скорее в негативную сторону – 98 👍👍👍👍👍 30% Да, скорее в позитивную сторону – 93 👍👍👍👍👍 28% 👥 331 people voted so far.

4 Dec 2025, 14:40 UTC≈3,610 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Понятно, что пользоваться Гигачатом в условиях честной конкуренции нет особого смысла, но я обнаружил область, в которой он уделывает любую другую нейросеть. Это... Поэзия на русском языке! Из-за токенизации большинство моделей плохо работают со слогами, поэтому и не понимают концепцию стихотворного размера. А вот Гигачат умеет и в размер, и в рифму, и в специфические схемы рифмовки, например для лимериков. Да, не …

❤18🥱6👍5👌3👨‍💻2🤮2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dreamsrobots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бурый
@sburyi · 18,995
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dreams and Robots” (@dreamsrobots), 2,869 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dreamsrobots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.