Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐”ปโ„๐”ธ๐•Ž ๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ผโ„•๐”ป ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Channel

๐”ปโ„๐”ธ๐•Ž ๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ผโ„•๐”ป ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

@drawlegendfixed

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

46,427subscribers

-991 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ€“100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001473399433
TypeChannel
Username@drawlegendfixed
DescriptionAdmin @draw_legend King ๐Ÿคด of draws โค๏ธโค๏ธ
Created4 July 2020 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drawlegendfixed

Topic

Gambling & betting โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

46,34547,41846,881.57 August 2026 โ€” 47,418 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 47,418 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 47,400 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 47,319 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 47,232 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 47,167 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 47,189 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 47,136 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 47,071 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 47,005 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 46,926 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 46,856 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 46,810 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 46,789 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 46,790 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 46,672 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 46,550 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 46,478 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 46,419 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 46,410 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 46,444 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 46,451 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 46,408 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 46,345 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 46,349 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 46,362 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 46,666 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 46,753 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 46,624 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 46,551 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 46,482 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 46,391 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 46,403 subscribers29 September 2026 โ€” 46,427 subscribers46,4277 August 202629 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 53 days, net -991. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 46,184โ€“47,579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 08:1946,427+24
17 Sept 2026, 23:3646,403+12
15 Sept 2026, 21:5846,391-91
14 Sept 2026, 04:0146,482-69
12 Sept 2026, 13:3846,551-73
10 Sept 2026, 10:2046,624-129
7 Sept 2026, 04:2046,753+87
4 Sept 2026, 14:1846,666+304
2 Sept 2026, 23:3946,362+13
2 Sept 2026, 00:4346,349+4
31 Aug 2026, 21:1246,345-63
30 Aug 2026, 22:5746,408-43
29 Aug 2026, 23:5446,451+7
28 Aug 2026, 20:3646,444+34
27 Aug 2026, 20:5346,410-9
26 Aug 2026, 22:0346,419-59
25 Aug 2026, 20:2346,478-72
24 Aug 2026, 17:1646,550-122
23 Aug 2026, 03:5446,672-118
21 Aug 2026, 12:5846,790first reading

Engagement

435 posts held, back to 4 July 2020 โ€” the reader has reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 111 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
4.56%
avg views รท 46,427 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
261 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.78%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
261
of 435 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 189 of 261 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held435 (4 July 2020 โ€“ 29 September 2026)
Views total552,078
Reactions total3,962
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
34
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

8,758 reactions across 324 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค7,20182.2%
๐Ÿ”ฅ3894.44%
๐Ÿ†1792.04%
๐Ÿ’ฏ1661.90%
๐Ÿ‘1411.61%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1281.46%
โšก971.11%
๐ŸŒ921.05%
๐Ÿ™881.00%
๐Ÿ•Š490.559%
๐Ÿ‘ป480.548%
๐Ÿ˜Ž470.537%
๐Ÿฅฐ440.502%
๐Ÿ’˜300.343%
๐Ÿค230.263%
๐Ÿซก130.148%
๐Ÿ“70.08%
๐Ÿ˜‡50.057%
๐Ÿคฉ50.057%
๐Ÿฆ„30.034%
2 further kinds30.034%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 324 of the 435 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 8,758 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 435 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2020 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 434 we hold a reading for ยท 3%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @drawlegendfixed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 435 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2020 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026

3/3 win ๐Ÿ† Join Vip ๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.me/+T0rzuYOX5WY2OWFl FIXED VIP CODE

โค1

29 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

DON'T MISS TODAY VIP GAME โœ…๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.me/+T0rzuYOX5WY2OWFl https://t.me/+T0rzuYOX5WY2OWFl 2๏ธโƒฃ4๏ธโƒฃ6๏ธโƒฃODDS FIXED ๐Ÿ†™๐Ÿ†™โœ…โœ…โœ… 100% fixed game link โคต๏ธโคต๏ธ CLICK FOR CODE

โค1

29 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTCโ‰ˆ2,360 views18 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค15๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ†1

29 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTCโ‰ˆ2,400 views13 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค11๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

29 Sept 2026, 06:58 UTCโ‰ˆ2,540 views50 reactions2 Starsread 29 September 2026
Photo

โœ…BET ACCEPTED ๐ŸŸข๐ŸŸข

โค34๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐Ÿ’ฏ2

29 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTCโ‰ˆ2,540 views24 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Armenia ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

โค18๐ŸŒ6

28 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTCโ‰ˆ1,450 views16 reactions1 Starread 28 September 2026

Why poor reaction ๐Ÿ˜”

โค16

28 Sept 2026, 09:53 UTCโ‰ˆ3,360 views73 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

38 ODDS COMBINE โค๏ธ

๐Ÿ˜Ž37โค31๐Ÿ’˜3๐Ÿ‘ป2

Showing the 12 most recent of 435 posts we hold for @drawlegendfixed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 18:29 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

Have all unmute this channel

  1. Yes74%
  2. No26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 435 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2020 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

๐Ÿ’ขโ“‚๏ธ ๐™ˆ๐™„๐˜ผ ๐˜ฝ๐™‡๐˜ผ๐™„๐™๐™€ ||โ„ข๏ธ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท
@Mia_Blaire0 ยท 77,755
3 posts
๐Ÿ’ข๐Ÿ”ฐ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡นAฬ…ฬฒLฬ…ฬฒNฬ…ฬฒAฬ…ฬฒZฬ…ฬฒIฬ…ฬฒRฬ…ฬฒ Eฬ…ฬฒUฬ…ฬฒRฬ…ฬฒOฬ…ฬฒ Bฬ…ฬฒEฬ…ฬฒTฬ…ฬฒ โšฝโœž๐“ƒต๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น
@Alnazirvip ยท 25,809
2 posts
Golden Odds Hub
@golden_oddshub ยท 681
2 posts
๐Ÿ’ข LARRY KINGS ๐Ÿ’ข
@kingsLarryDE ยท 11,290
2 posts
๐ŸซŸGา‰Rา‰Aา‰Cา‰Eา‰๐ŸซŸ
@ORG_GRACE ยท 30,656
2 posts
๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฌ๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ง๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜€โšก๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
@Royalhubs ยท 29,154
2 posts
๐“๐ก๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฒ๐š ๐Ÿฆ…
@TheMaurya11 ยท 35,862
2 posts
๐‘จ๐‘ณ ๐‘ซ๐’€๐‘ฉ๐‘จ๐‘ณ๐‘จ ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ
@fixed_dailys ยท 22,961
1 post
๐‘จ๐’_๐‘บ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’Ž ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ
@GetFreeCorrectScores ยท 73,245
1 post
James Torla Info๐Ÿฅ‡
@jamestorla_info ยท 45,304
1 post
๐ŸšฌสŸแดœแด‹แด€ ๊œฐษชxแด‡แด… ษชษด๊œฐแด ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ
@Luka_02901 ยท 47,954
1 post
Marco Sport Tips โšฝ
@Marcobet12 ยท 13,770
1 post
๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ž๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐Ÿ’Ž
@Masonstakes ยท 6,282
1 post
DERLOS๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ’ฏ
@PRIMEPICKSA ยท 18,806
1 post
๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช
@soccersports123 ยท 17,883
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐”ปโ„๐”ธ๐•Ž ๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ผโ„•๐”ป ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งโ€ (@drawlegendfixed), 46,427 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drawlegendfixed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.