Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1

Channel
@drAyupova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,183subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001216304721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drAyupova |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drAyupova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 9,183 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 9,188 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 9,194 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 9,199 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 9,202 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 9,212 | +9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 9,203 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 9,208 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 9,218 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 9,219 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 9,220 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 9,220 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (16 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,959 |
| Reactions total | 284 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
743 reactions across 29 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 345 | 46.4% | |
| 🔥 | 119 | 16.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 93 | 12.5% | |
| 💯 | 64 | 8.61% | |
| 🙏 | 47 | 6.33% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 5.11% | |
| 😍 | 24 | 3.23% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 1.08% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.538% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.135% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 743 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1
Ставят нити, чтобы сделать лисьи глазки... 🤪🤪🤪 Мое мнение: ⬇️⬇️⬇️
❤2
ПОДГОТОВКА К БОТОКСУ: ЧЕК-ЛИСТ ДЛЯ ПАЦИЕНТОВ Дорогие мои, отвечаю на ваши вопросы 📝 Перед процедурой я всегда собираю подробный анамнез. 💛Вот 3 ключевых фактора, которые я учитываю в обязательном порядке: ✔️1. Лабораторные анализы и нутрицевтики Я подробно расспрашиваю, какие БАДы вы принимаете и когда сдавали кровь. Например, витамин Е или гинкго билоба разжижают кровь, могут влиять на гематомы. А дефициты белк…
❤🔥9😍2👍1🥰1
⚠️ Почему игольчатый РФ может уничтожить вашу кожу Многие девушки воспринимают игольчатый РФ-лифтинг как волшебную палочку: Пришла, получила порцию микропроколов и прогрева, и кожа магическим образом сократилась и подтянулась. Но на практике я всё чаще вижу плачевные результаты: СЕТКУ на лице и МАРЛЮ Игольчатый РФ — это жесткая, агрессивная процедура. Сначала иголки нарушают целостность кожи, а затем идет мощный …
❤8💯5🥰5😍3👍1
По возможности удаляйте зубы мудрости если корни б этих зубов не лежат горизонтально! Важно сделать снимок и показать хирургу
❤5
📍Зубы мудрости: надо ли удалять? 📍Как влияют на молодость лица? 📍Что будет, если ничего не делать с восьмерками? Дорогие мои, ответила на вопросы в видео - не забудьте поделиться с подругой ⭐️
❤8❤🔥3👍1🥰1😍1
🦷 Как прикус и отсутствие зубов меняют молодость лица Мы можем покупать самые дорогие кремы, делать аппаратные подтяжки и вкалывать филлеры, но часто забываем про главный каркас нашего лица, мои дорогие За овал лица, чёткий подбородок, гладкую кожу и объём губ на 70% отвечает нижняя треть лица — а именно кости челюсти, правильный прикус и полный комплект зубов! Если этот костный каркас нарушен, никакие косметологи…
❤8👍4❤🔥1🥰1😍1
⭐️Вы давно просили сделать канал в Максе Всех жду! max.ru/channel_eshtegolovoi
🔥2
💉 ДИСПЛАСТИКИ В КАБИНЕТЕ КОСМЕТОЛОГА: КАКИЕ ПРОЦЕДУРЫ ВЫБРАТЬ? Если у вас дисплазия соединительной ткани (ДСТ), вы наверняка замечали: синяки после обычных уколов держатся неделями, мезонити проваливаются, а разрекламированный аппаратный лифтинг почему-то не дает обещанного эффекта... Почему так происходит? У диспластиков генетически нарушен синтез правильного коллагена. Кожа тонкая, быстро теряет тонус, склонна …
❤14❤🔥2🔥1🥰1😍1
💍 А вот и свадьба Роналду и матери его детей Джорджины, а также их повседневная жизнь в зале Глядя на эту пару, напрашивается сразу несколько важных выводов: 1️⃣ Дисциплина на высоте Не разжирел и держит в отличной форме и себя, и жену. Имея свыше $200 млн, проще всего было бы расслабиться на релаксе и превратиться в кабанов. Но нет, они пашут над своими телами каждый день. Меня особенно впечатлила фигура Джорджин…
❤26💯9❤🔥4🥰3👍1
УГРИ И ПРЫЩИ НА СПИНЕ 😰 Как думаете, в чем здесь причина и в какую сторону копать? Кому-то знакома проблема? Нужен пост?
🙏31❤🔥10❤5🥰1
🍲 РЕЦЕПТ ПРАВИЛЬНОГО КОСТНОГО БУЛЬОНА Дорогие мои, сразу скажу, что обычный бульон за 1 час нам не подойдет. Нам нужно вытопить из костей максимум пользы! ✨ Ингредиенты: • Кости: 1.5–2 кг (говяжьи мослаки, суставы, хвосты, индюшачьи или куриные лапки/шеи — чем больше хрящей, тем лучше!) • Вода: 3–4 литра • Яблочный уксус (нефильтрованный): 2 столовые ложки! • Овощи и специи: лук, морковь, стебель сельдерея, ла…
❤20❤🔥3🥰2😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @drAyupova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Татьяна Аюпова: врач-нутрициолог, косметолог” (@drAyupova), 9,183 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drAyupova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.