Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 海外国际曝光社

Channel

海外国际曝光社

@dongnanyav1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,332subscribers

-69 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002891183642
TypeChannel
Username@dongnanyav1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dongnanyav1

Growth

3,3323,4013,366.511 August 2026 — 3,401 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,401 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,353 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,332 subscribers11 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,322–3,411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:373,332-21
15 Aug 2026, 04:443,353-48
11 Aug 2026, 19:273,401no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:313,401first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.9%
avg views ÷ 3,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.0
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held10 (25 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total300
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC50 viewsread 11 August 2026

为了方便各位老板们我们强力推荐几款常用软件给大家希望各位老板用的放心用的愉快 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 💥译达通 💥海王翻译 💥CC翻译 💥007chat 💥HiGeek翻译 💥速推营销 💥旺财作图 💥美洽官方 💥绘图大师 💥人设套图

25 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC43 viewsread 11 August 2026

欢迎新老朋友光临 ,全球各地区人设导航 💋请在对应频道内挑选😔 😉亚洲女性套图 😉亚洲男性套图 😉欧洲女性套图 😉欧洲男性套图 😉免费 —女私密 😉免费 — 男私密 😉全 球 素 材 馆 😉海 外 素 材 库 😉胴体艺术学院 😉海外国际曝光 😉壁纸头像写真 😉吃瓜群众 联盟 😲以上部分素材自带证件其他素材均可制作国内外证件 私密女性套图 🫤️素描彩绘 😲代开会员 😑️美工P图 🥴查档· 开房· 司法· 定位· 户籍 ·银行卡 🥴代洗套图 小红书 IG 抖音 快手 FB 推特 持续上新人设素材,可关注频道避免错过 😀😀😀 @B8989666 😀😀😀 @B8989666 我们还

25 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC38 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

#柬埔寨资讯:波贝开展外国人检查行动,发现33名外籍人员,两处涉嫌涉诈场所被查封 7月25日,班迭棉芷省副省长布拉克·波利(Prak Poli)继续带领省级联合工作组,在班迭棉芷省初级法院副检察官穆特·桑帕(Mut Sambath)的协调下,对当地多个外国人居住及活动场所展开实地检查。 此次行动共检查4处地点,其中2处被临时封闭,共发现外国人33名,其中女性6名,涉及两个国籍,包括印度籍25人(女性6人)、中国籍8人(男性),以及1名柬埔寨籍男子。 该行动由班迭棉芷省省长乌姆·拉蒂(Um Rath)和班迭棉芷省初级法院检察官高·文纳烈(Koe Vannareth)统一指挥开展。 据检查报告显示: 第一处地点: 位于波贝市中央市场分区中央市场村的一栋4层建筑,共16间房间。现场发现25名印度籍人员,其中6人为女性。警方检查后未发现与网络诈骗犯罪相关的可疑设备,相关人员主要接受进一步核查和教育。 第二处地点: 位于波贝市

25 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC33 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:昨天晚上,老挝部队一共来了28辆政府车辆先已经抵达金三角特外,目的是清查特外还存在遗留的大量诈骗人员。

25 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC31 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

网上即可办理!重庆返还1.97亿被骗资金 7月24日,重庆市政府新闻办举行2026年全市反诈工作新闻发布会。 群众发现被骗后,只需要第一时间拨打110报警,公安机关就能快速启动紧急止付,止付时间从半小时缩短到3分钟,被骗资金成功拦截率提升近3倍。 同时,重庆在全国率先实现涉诈资金返还全流程网办,平均返还周期从以前的66天缩短至现在的31天。 群众只需要登录“渝快办”APP,就可以在线提交返还申请、查询办理进度,实现涉诈资金返还“零跑腿”。 今年以来,全市已向受害群众返还被骗资金1.97亿元。

25 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#国内资讯:60余人落网!山东烟台莱州市公安成功打掉一个网络直播诈骗团伙! 莱州市公安局7月23日对外披露案件详情:近日,莱州市公安局结合烟台市“齐鲁守护·夏季攻势”专项行动,开展跨省集群收网,奔赴江苏常州成功打掉一个依托直播间售卖玉石、以高价回收、抽奖模式引流实施诈骗的犯罪团伙,一举抓获嫌疑人60余名,现场查获玉石、首饰、小家电等涉案物品一批。 5月11日,莱州市公安局刑侦大队获取警情,文峰路街道杨女士在微信直播间购买物品时被骗人民币3万余元。接警后,民警围绕网络流、资金流顺线追踪研判,并对接烟台市公安局开展技术支撑,锁定位于江苏省常州市武进区创业园内、以冯某、李某为首的直播诈骗团伙。 经实地侦查核实,该团伙通过售卖玉石、承诺高价回收、举办抽奖活动吸引客户充值,诱导受害人转账后失联,警方初步锁定涉案人员40余名。 7月13日,抓捕时机成熟,莱州公安抽调40余名精干警力组成专案组奔赴常州开展跨省收网。行动期间恰逢台风过境

25 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

#吃瓜:大力神杯也扛不住岁月啊😂 陪伴世界杯几十年,见过无数巨星捧起它,也经历过无数次颁奖现场的闪光灯洗礼。结果年纪大了以后,身体零件也开始“报警”——以前是球员拼命追它,现在轮到它需要保养了。这不,大力神杯最近感觉腰酸背痛、状态下滑,正准备躺平养老,关键时刻美团买药及时出现:“别慌,老伙计,药已经送过来了!” 从绿茵场上的冠军象征,到如今需要美团买药救场,大力神杯也逃不过岁月这把杀猪刀。 “以前它见证别人夺冠,现在别人见证它吃药。” “这杯子年轻时装满荣耀,年纪大了装满保温杯。” “几十年征战世界杯,终于也进入养生模式了。” 只能说:英雄会老,奖杯也会生锈,唯有美团买药永远都在!😂

25 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#网友吐槽:想过出门好好喂狗,但没想过狗吃相这么难看。 号称波贝最豪华的水会——文南•阁(原波贝壹号•水韵会所),我就说,既然是这么高端的场所,怎么里面还会有小偷小摸?是你老板开不起工资,还是说你老板专门培训过你们,让你们干这种掏客人钱包、偷鸡摸狗的事情? 我看不用叫什么“文南•阁”了,再改个名,就叫“扒手阁”吧。看你们这些人,根本不像正儿八经干会所的。真是信了你们的鬼话,说什么“只有客人手牌才能开柜”。 干你娘的,一群专业扒手! 出现这种事情,就能看出来内部管理到底有多松散、多不靠谱。你倒是查啊?一直推三阻四的。后台开柜记录看不到,那你们查了吗?最后跟我说报警处理,然后结果呢?钱丢了,就这样不了了之。 我是真庆幸,现在兄弟姐妹们走得差不多了。不然进了你这个“扒手阁”,指不定还要脱一层皮。 也奉劝还在波贝的兄弟姐妹们,一定要避坑,千万千万不要去“文南•阁”送钱。有多少东西,能给你偷多少,最后你还得给扒手买单。 而且

25 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC25 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

回头看!柴桢省跨部门联合检查新世界赌场 今天上午,柴桢省副省长孟英联合商业博彩管理委员会副秘书长等跨部门工作组,对巴域市“新世界赌场”(NEW WORLD Casino)进行质量评估与实地检查。 本次检查旨在落实政府有关清查网络诈骗的第01号指令,确保合法赌场无隐匿涉诈等违法行为。此外,工作组将更新赌场数据,作为2026年度续牌及制定2030年商业博彩发展战略的依据。 据悉,本次抽查行动将持续至8月9日,覆盖柴桢全省所有赌场。

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dongnanyav1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 250,609 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“海外国际曝光社” (@dongnanyav1), 3,332 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dongnanyav1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.