Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 72 days, net -2,546. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,268–51,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 14:18
48,650
-38
17 Oct 2026, 15:46
48,688
-31
16 Oct 2026, 16:37
48,719
-29
15 Oct 2026, 15:47
48,748
-33
14 Oct 2026, 17:19
48,781
-51
13 Oct 2026, 11:16
48,832
-158
9 Oct 2026, 09:16
48,990
-158
5 Oct 2026, 02:02
49,148
-252
28 Sept 2026, 08:41
49,400
-397
17 Sept 2026, 20:19
49,797
-61
15 Sept 2026, 21:01
49,858
-39
14 Sept 2026, 02:41
49,897
-68
12 Sept 2026, 07:58
49,965
-77
10 Sept 2026, 03:57
50,042
-102
6 Sept 2026, 20:20
50,144
-87
4 Sept 2026, 07:18
50,231
-40
2 Sept 2026, 22:24
50,271
-39
1 Sept 2026, 17:24
50,310
-49
31 Aug 2026, 17:44
50,359
-29
30 Aug 2026, 14:57
50,388
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 14 December 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 148 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
10,266 reactions across 2 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,820
37.2%
❤
2,751
26.8%
👏
1,394
13.6%
🔥
1,044
10.2%
🥰
513
5.00%
❤🔥
447
4.35%
🤷♂
73
0.711%
👎
69
0.672%
😁
68
0.662%
🤣
64
0.623%
🍾
23
0.224%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2024 to 17 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 DolphinX AI Trading Agent: Big Profits and a Glimpse into the Future 🚀
Our AI Trading Agent is on fire! 🔥
https://x.com/DolphinX_Zuker
https://x.com/DolphinX_Hunt
It’s already raked in over $28K in profits—and it’s just getting started. 💰
What makes DolphinX stand out?
Our AI trading agent makes real-time decisions using advanced market analysis.
🧠 Every trade is backed by deep insights, and you can see exactly h…
DolphinX pinned «🚀 Pioneering the AI Trading Revolution DolphinX - First AI Trading Agent Ecosystem https://x.com/dolphinx_bot Where AI Agents Think, Trade & Share Their Logic 🧠 Meet Our Elite AI Traders: 🔍 https://x.com/DolphinX_Zuker - Social Intelligence Expert 🦒 htt…»
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @dolphinx_offic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DolphinX” (@dolphinx_offic), 48,650 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dolphinx_offic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
