Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for dokhtark_zemestan❄☃️👧

Channel

dokhtark_zemestan❄☃️👧

@dokhtark_zemestan

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,356subscribers

+743 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001478282221
TypeChannel
Username@dokhtark_zemestan
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dokhtark_zemestan

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,6133,3782,495.56 August 2026 — 1,613 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,613 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,620 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,614 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,609 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,599 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,596 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,589 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,585 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,581 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,578 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,449 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,378 subscribers27 September 2026 — 2,391 subscribers5 October 2026 — 2,363 subscribers12 October 2026 — 2,356 subscribers2,3566 August 202612 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 67 days, net +743. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,348–3,643 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 09:012,356-7
5 Oct 2026, 12:562,363-28
27 Sept 2026, 23:002,391-987
15 Sept 2026, 22:413,378+929
12 Sept 2026, 06:212,449-129
8 Sept 2026, 00:012,578-3
2 Sept 2026, 11:252,581-4
30 Aug 2026, 14:562,585-4
27 Aug 2026, 06:072,589-7
23 Aug 2026, 23:432,596-3
20 Aug 2026, 09:352,599-10
17 Aug 2026, 11:362,609-5
14 Aug 2026, 01:572,614-6
10 Aug 2026, 16:562,620+1,007
6 Aug 2026, 18:451,613no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:341,613first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢2333.3%
💔1724.6%
👌68.70%
👍57.25%
💘57.25%
😭45.80%
👏34.35%
🕊34.35%
⚡22.90%
🤷‍♀11.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بزرگترین خیانت آدمیزاد در حقِ خودش؛ فروختنِ تنهایی اش به آدم هایِ بی اَرزش است. @dokhtark_zemestan

👌1

5 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شبایی که بی تو گذشت مُردنو یادِ من دادن😭 پنجشنبه ات بخیر قلبم🥀 #پدرم❤️‍🩹 @dokhtark_zemestan

💔1

3 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

در حال خداحافظی کردن با نسخه‌ای هستم که به همه اهمیت میداد. @dokhtark_zemestan

👍1👏1

29 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC71 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تو فقط پدرم نبودی، آرامش دلم بودی… و حالا دلتنگ‌ترین آدم دنیا منم🙂🖤 پنجشنبه ات بخیر🥀 #پدرم❤️‍🩹 @dokhtark_zemestan

💔2😢2

29 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC71 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

بعضی از آدما بالشتشون پر قو نیست، خستگیشونه… @dokhtark_zemestan

😢2💔1

28 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

گریه نکردم! @dokhtark_zemestan

😢2💔1

27 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC61 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من یک‌سری حرفارو فقط یک بار شنیدم، ولی صد دفعه قلبم بخاطرشون درد گرفت و شکست. @dokhtark_zemestan

😢2💔1💘1

25 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

و در نهايت در جست‌وجوی تكيه‌ گاهی به خويش ميرسی... و زندگی بارها و بارها و بارها، تو را با "خودت" روبرو خواهد كرد... @dokhtark_zemestan

⚡1👍1👏1

22 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سلام بر پاره ی تنم که رفت و ندانست دلتنگی اش چقدر درد دارد... هنوز هم سخت ترین درد من باور نبودن توست. پنجشنبه ات بخیر غم بی پایان من🥀🖤 #پدرم❤️‍🩹 @dokhtark_zemestan

💔1😢1😭1

21 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC82 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من جنگیدم که تو دلم نمونه وگرنه خودم میدونستم تهش نمیشه @dokhtark_zemestan

😢2👌1💘1

19 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سیاه به تن نداشت ولی، همه چیز را از دست داده بود.. 🖤😔 @dokhtark_zemestan

💔2💘1😢1

19 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC80 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خیلی از ما یه تیکه از وجودمون رو تو وجود کسایی جا گذاشتیم که یا نیستن یا برای همیشه رفتن @dokhtark_zemestan

💘2💔1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dokhtark_zemestan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dokhtark_zemestan❄☃️👧” (@dokhtark_zemestan), 2,356 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dokhtark_zemestan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.