Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дневник тревожницы Алёны Кобяковой🕊️

Channel

Дневник тревожницы Алёны Кобяковой🕊️

@dnevniktrevogki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

10,679subscribers

-310 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001616260539
TypeChannel
Username@dnevniktrevogki
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dnevniktrevogki

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,67910,98910,8347 August 2026 — 10,989 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,983 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,972 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,969 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,963 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,956 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,940 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,925 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,912 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,907 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,888 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,874 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,854 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,856 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,855 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,849 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,834 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,821 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,818 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,812 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,798 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,776 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,758 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,748 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,731 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,705 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,723 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,735 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,728 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,703 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,679 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -310. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,633–11,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:1510,679-24
15 Sept 2026, 16:5710,703-25
13 Sept 2026, 21:3610,728-7
12 Sept 2026, 07:1810,735+12
10 Sept 2026, 03:4110,723+18
6 Sept 2026, 18:2210,705-26
4 Sept 2026, 09:4110,731-17
2 Sept 2026, 23:5410,748-10
1 Sept 2026, 20:5410,758-18
31 Aug 2026, 21:2410,776-22
30 Aug 2026, 20:1910,798-14
29 Aug 2026, 19:2410,812-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:3410,818-3
27 Aug 2026, 18:1710,821-13
26 Aug 2026, 16:0410,834-15
25 Aug 2026, 12:3210,849-6
24 Aug 2026, 15:4710,855-1
23 Aug 2026, 02:1510,856+2
21 Aug 2026, 14:5810,854-20
20 Aug 2026, 12:5310,874first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.70%
avg views ÷ 10,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held42 (30 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total10,363
Reactions total145
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

967 reactions across 40 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35536.7%
👍14515.0%
🤣14114.6%
🔥12713.1%
❤‍🔥444.55%
💯424.34%
💔272.79%
😍272.79%
😁141.45%
💋80.827%
🥰80.827%
40.414%
🤝40.414%
🤩40.414%
🙏30.31%
🍓20.207%
🐳20.207%
😎20.207%
🤔20.207%
👌10.103%
5 further kinds50.517%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 967 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 07:38 UTC468 views15 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Задняя парта,я вам не мешаю? А какие у вас воспоминания со школой?🤪

8🤣7

1 Sept 2026, 04:47 UTC537 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Любимые мои тревожники,кто хотел начать работать со своей и тревогой с сентября,вот и он 🤌🏼

🤣82

31 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC695 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Желающие на разбор ко мне⬇️ Пожалуйста в комментариях напишите: 1.Имя/возраст и как давно в тревоге? 2.Диагноз(если были у специалиста) 3.Какой запрос вы хотели бы разобрать на встречи со мной Сразу поясню,разбор будет проходить с видео записью,которую я опубликую исключительно в своих каналах.Если вы не согласны на публикации после,к сожалению,разбор состояться не сможет 🤌🏼Разбор бесплатный.

9

31 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC663 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Voice message

Меня осенило ночью от этой мысли 😨Я вообще забыла об этом,но именно этот случай стал отправной точкой моего невроза

13

27 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥13👍83🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC≈1,270 views19 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Voice message

«Ален,блять,за 2 года психолог не рассказал мне и грамма того,что ты разложила мне на час😭» Разобрала ситуацию на рынке психотерапии в России.Там всё плачевно,но есть маленькая надежда.

14💯4👍1

25 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,360 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Voice message

Как я нашла в себе силы идти дальше,несмотря на симптомы и откаты?

17👍4🤩2

25 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,350 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Ален,❤️🌷как ты поняла,что все у тебя получилось, этот этап жизни перешагнуть стойко и жить,с ясной головой без симптомов???🙏🙏🙏Я к тому,что вроде ,думаю ну вот вроде как получается многое,наверно скоро а понимаю ,бывают откаты гребанные и потом страх их ,но я еще наращиваю дозу антидепрессантов, то есть до 100 не дошла

6

24 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,470 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Зачем страдать,если можно не страдать. (с)Цитаты великих👩🏼 Ваша новая спокойная жизнь здесь: https://t.me/withoutpanic_bot

🤣52

24 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,370 views18 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Voice message

Почему мы не идем работать со своей тревогой? Здесь же все очевидно-я страдаю и мне нужна помощь.Но почему тогда мозг дает сопротивление в самый решающий момент? Слушаем подкаст на эту тему 🫶🏻

15👍2🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,580 views35 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Признаюсь только вам… Всегда,когда я плаваю в большой воде(реки,моря,океаны),я думаю «А вдруг сейчас будет проплывать тр*п и случайно заденет меня» 🤣Это теперь уже очень смешно,потому что я начала говорить об этом своим близким и они тоже начали бояться 🤣

🤣2110🤝4

22 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,580 views32 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Убегала в мини трип на выходные ❤️‍🔥 Господи,вы бы знали,как хорошо жить без мыслей: А ВДРУГ… «А вдруг авария», «А вдруг ребенок утонет», «вдруг станет плохо,а рядом нет скорой…» 🫠 Осталось одно дебильное «А вдруг»,от которого я так и не избавилась,но я уже просто ржу 🤣Хотите расскажу 🤪

🤣218🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @dnevniktrevogki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTCAnonymous Poll185 voters

Родные,а сколько здесь таких,кто пытается «справиться» с тревогой самостоятельно?

  1. Я 👋🏼60%
  2. Работаю с твоим каналом 💔15%
  3. Работаю в канале+психотерапевт 👏11%
  4. Только психотерапия 👌🏼19%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дневник тревожницы Алёны Кобяковой🕊️” (@dnevniktrevogki), 10,679 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevniktrevogki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.