Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 中國地震速报(≥4.5级)

Channel

中國地震速报(≥4.5级)

@dizhen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

1,015subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121139227
TypeChannel
Username@dizhen
Created13 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dizhen

Growth

1,0151,0231,0196 August 2026 — 1,023 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,023 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,022 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,017 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,015 subscribers6 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,014–1,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 07:431,015-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:471,017-5
10 Aug 2026, 05:311,022-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:051,023no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:581,023first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 1,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,206
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC75 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 5.0 - 16 km NW of Changning, China

2 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC86 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.9 - 207 km NW of Oula Xiuma, China

1 Aug 2026, 01:53 UTC107 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.7 - 206 km NW of Oula Xiuma, China

29 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC177 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.6 - 102 km WNW of Aykol, China

28 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC187 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.7 - 198 km NW of Oula Xiuma, China

28 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC194 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 5.1 - 198 km NW of Oula Xiuma, China

28 Jul 2026, 03:51 UTC195 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 5.8 - 191 km NW of Oula Xiuma, China

28 Jul 2026, 03:33 UTC185 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 5.8 - 190 km NW of Oula Xiuma, China

26 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC190 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.7 - 15 km ESE of Pinglin, Taiwan

21 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC260 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.9 - 78 km NE of Simao, China

17 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC312 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.8 - 262 km SSE of Dunhuang, China

12 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC378 viewsread 6 August 2026

real-time earthquake above 4.5 in China ◆ M 4.6 - 126 km NNE of Kangding, China

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dizhen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“中國地震速报(≥4.5级)” (@dizhen), 1,015 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dizhen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.