Channel
@diht_complexity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,100subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001122011875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @diht_complexity |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/diht_complexity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 1,100 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 1,101 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 1,100 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 1,100 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
93 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 25 | 26.9% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 16.1% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 12.9% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.53% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 7.53% | |
| 😨 | 6 | 6.45% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| 🎃 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нужно сейчас заявить спецкурс на следующий год. Традиционно я читаю спецкурс на одну из продвинутых тем курса сложности вычислений. Раньше было только осенью, но последние 4 года по просьбам слушателей продолжаю и весной. В связи с тем, что студенты ПМИ.Инф уже проходили курс криптографии, а он обязательный для кафедры ДМ, он будет заменён на более продвинутый курс криптографии, так что один курс точно будет. Не увер…
Signed Daniil Musatov
Контрольная будет завтра с 12:20 до 15:20 в Цифре, 2.36. Кто хочет писать, отметьтесь в табличке, а то не будет варианта.
Signed Daniil Musatov
Сделал табличку для выбора даты кр, должно редактироваться по ссылке: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PVLo1Tmm_hnT6S1KHpmMz3607Mk8BuOWUijOUyTMJWU/edit?usp=sharing
🌚1
Signed Daniil Musatov
Мы подготовили второе домашнее задание. Поставил срок сдачи следующий понедельник, дальше вряд ли сможем продлить.
👎12👻4😁4🔥1🥰1
Signed Daniil Musatov
Предварительно расписание на оставшиеся занятия: Завтра, 7 мая, будет только лекция про рациональные интерактивные доказательства, без семинара. Лекцию постараюсь начать вовремя, но могу задержаться из-за важного созвона. 14 мая будет 2 семинара: во время лекции и во время обычного семинара.
Signed Daniil Musatov
Также сделал папку с материалами: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/9wslv92i9vqbg1cdvqr54/AGAfcvXxt7B1wdrqryhB_uE?rlkey=775k6hbqsg4k0nv9fluf6fwqt&dl=0 Там два последних файла и последняя версия компл-бука. Что ещё нужно туда положить?
Signed Daniil Musatov
Также есть возможность выполнить индивидуальный проект. На этом курсе он не блокирующий, но если вам интереснее разобраться в какой-то теме вместо решения задач, то это хороший вариант. Занимать номера проектов можно тут, должно быть открыто для редактирования: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16YrAMmJgOBkFG19q5RLJr0SQz7AdTH6h7KZ4SGt7fwU/edit?usp=sharing
❤2
Signed Daniil Musatov
Как обещал вчера, сделал индивидуальные домашние задания. Пока что про IP, AM и ZKP. Про PCP и MIP будет ещё второе. Срок сдачи - после майских.
❤2
Signed Daniil Musatov
Сегодня, 16 апреля, лекция начнётся по расписанию (обсудим класс MIP и теорему MIP=NEXP), а вот семинара не будет - Иван заболел.
😭7
Signed Daniil Musatov
Сегодня, 2 апреля, лекции не будет - я болею. Семинар будет по расписанию.
😢19🐳1🙏1
Signed Daniil Musatov
Завтра, 19 марта, лекция будет. Начнём вовремя, приходите!
❤7😢6
Signed Daniil Musatov
Завтра, 26 февраля, семинар состоится онлайн, ссылка появится в чате перед началом семинара. Настройка трансляции через проектор в аудитории остаётся на усмотрение слушателей.
👍3🎉2🤨1
Signed Daniil Musatov
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @diht_complexity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,542,006 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сложность вычислений ФПМИ” (@diht_complexity), 1,100 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diht_complexity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.