Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Digital Business Creators (DBC)

Channel

Digital Business Creators (DBC)

@digitalbusinesscreators

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,435subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650401498
TypeChannel
Username@digitalbusinesscreators
DescriptionCalendar: http://bit.ly/3Wv8OOK QnA with Zeeshan: 25th January, Wednesday, 7:30 pm ZOOM ID - 991 0842 5912 or link https://zoom.us/j/99108425912
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalbusinesscreators

Growth

8,4358,5278,4817 August 2026 — 8,527 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,527 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,525 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,507 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,492 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,471 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,455 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,435 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 18 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,421–8,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 23:288,435-20
21 Aug 2026, 01:238,455-16
18 Aug 2026, 01:518,471-21
14 Aug 2026, 18:188,492-15
11 Aug 2026, 14:158,507-18
8 Aug 2026, 04:548,525-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:008,527no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:508,527first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Videos
77
Links
68

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 47s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

302 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20066.2%
5016.6%
🔥185.96%
👏92.98%
🥰72.32%
💩61.99%
👎41.32%
😁30.993%
❤‍🔥20.662%
💋20.662%
🤩10.331%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2023 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Dec 2025, 08:36 UTC≈2,200 views7 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZeeshanShaikhDBC8Video

Registration: https://forms.gle/heKwx2KkTwfrm7bF8

7

28 Nov 2025, 05:57 UTC≈2,600 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

If you are interested connect with me on +91 9076380452

1

26 Jun 2025, 12:46 UTC≈4,570 views3 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

A message from my heart. https://forms.gle/hr5o41EjH2qUDEkp8

2👎1

25 May 2025, 09:38 UTC≈5,430 views2 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Register here: https://forms.gle/aGWiviVpz7VjSLuEA

2

19 Apr 2025, 10:26 UTC≈5,950 views2 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Register here: https://forms.gle/aGWiviVpz7VjSLuEA

2

14 Apr 2025, 07:59 UTC≈6,070 views3 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

📱 This Video Will Save 11 Years of Your Life What if I told you… you're not living your life — you're just watching it scroll by? The average Indian spends 5.5 hours/day on their phone. By age 59, that’s 11.2 years of life—gone. Watch this 15-minute video now — it might give you back a decade of life. 🔗 https://youtu.be/rbn8SCyT-Z8?si=9qixm9fgzicgwxpo

🔥21

25 Feb 2025, 11:10 UTC≈6,220 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

3👍1🔥1

23 Jun 2023, 06:26 UTC≈18,000 views42 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Poll

How effective do you find AI tools in enhancing content creation?

  1. a) Very effective63%
  2. b) Moderately effective28%
  3. c) Ineffective9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍286🥰3❤‍🔥2💋2🤩1

31 May 2023, 09:34 UTC≈19,900 views33 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

𝐔𝐧𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐈 ✔️ Glimpse from our DBC Academy Weekly live classes 🟢 [𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇]

👍27🔥32😁1

23 May 2023, 11:27 UTC≈19,100 views24 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Poll

What is the most effective way to earn money through content creation?

  1. 1. Ad revenue27%
  2. 2. Sponsored content31%
  3. 3. Selling digital products23%
  4. 4. Affiliate Marketing18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍184🔥2

19 May 2023, 07:29 UTC≈17,200 views23 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 ✔️ Glimpse from our DBC Academy Weekly live classes 🟢 [𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇]

👍192🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @digitalbusinesscreators. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jun 2023, 06:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,180 voters approx.

How effective do you find AI tools in enhancing content creation?

  1. a) Very effective63%
  2. b) Moderately effective28%
  3. c) Ineffective9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 May 2023, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Poll1,070 voters approx.

What is the most effective way to earn money through content creation?

  1. 1. Ad revenue27%
  2. 2. Sponsored content31%
  3. 3. Selling digital products23%
  4. 4. Affiliate Marketing18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 May 2023, 07:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,040 voters approx.

Which AI tool do you find most useful for your work or daily life?

  1. 1. CHATGPT82%
  2. 2. NOTION.AI8%
  3. 3. MIDJOURNEY5%
  4. 4. ADOBE PODCAST6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 May 2023, 06:49 UTCAnonymous Poll688 voters

Have you ever used AI-powered tools for content creation?

  1. a) Yes, frequently39%
  2. b) Yes, occasionally19%
  3. c) No, never42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 May 2023, 06:51 UTCAnonymous Poll711 voters

Which of the following is NOT a common type of content?

  1. A) Videos18%
  2. B) Infographics22%
  3. C) Podcasts9%
  4. D) Sculptures51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Apr 2023, 06:07 UTCAnonymous Poll359 voters

What is the purpose of a call-to-action in content?

  1. A) To encourage the reader to take a specific action65%
  2. B) To provide additional information about a topic18%
  3. C) To summarize the main points of the content16%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2023 to 2 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 499,642 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Digital Business Creators (DBC)” (@digitalbusinesscreators), 8,435 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalbusinesscreators.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.