Channel
@digitalbudni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,109subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001139648441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @digitalbudni |
| Created | 9 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/digitalbudni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 2,109 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 2,113 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 2,115 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 2,120 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 2,124 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,125 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 2,126 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 2,127 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 2,127 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 69.2% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The risk of future. The more money accumulated in a hands of single person - the more inequality between rich and poor. That’s where government comes with taxes: to take a % (sometimes with a progressive %) and distribute back to the people (sometimes as a tax back, most of the times as a variety of benefits). But it’s a similar to a giving a man a fish per day; while on an opposite side can be forcing to get rich…
Blockchain of voting Interesting fact that current blockchain technology provides an infrastructure to vote for any kind of proposition. It’s already implemented for a development of projects, applications and even companies: - Voting is based either on tokens you hold on a wallet or stake. Or for a bitcoin on a power of compute / calculations provided. It’s about infra. While on an application side: UI UX, Web3 a…
“Let me speak from my heart ❤️” Well, I understand that you have subscribed for a Russian text However, now I feel it’s an interesting experience to share my life notes in English Also the quality of translation integrated in a TG is quite good and accessible in one click, and I hope you will continue to read in any other language you prefer It’s quite a milestone when half of my adult life as for now is abroad
👍4
Channel name was changed to «Marketing Mindset»
Поделитесь пожалуйста контактом рилсмейкеров - на постоянный объем и долгосрочное сотрудничество Со своей стороны ТЗ, видео, участие - моя личка: @arturgram
Финалочка: что сбывается чаще всего? «Банализация технологий» - мы ждем киберпанка, а получаем просто новые кнопки в старых интерфейсах. Если мы сравним жизнь в 90-ые и сегодня, в 2026 году - базовая «человеческая прошивка» осталась прежней: мы так же пьем кофе по утрам, так же можем поссориться с близкими, переживаем из-за денег, влюбляемся и пытаемся найти смысл жизни. Биологию интернет не отменил. Но структурн…
👍1🔥1
Чтобы я хотел, наблюдая за статистикой рождаемости и сокращением населения отдельных стран (например Южная Корея с одной из самых низких рождаемостью в мире) • Аграрный мир: Дети были экономическим активом. Чем больше детей, тем больше рук в поле и тем обеспеченнее ваша старость. • Индустриальный мир: Дети требуют колоссальных вложений (жилье, образование, медицина), чаще всего матери "жертвуют" карьерой и доходом.…
2 Увеличивайте свою производительность за счет ИИ-агентов. Смотрите видео на ютубе, пробуйте, тестируйте Claude, Cursor, OpenClaw. Моя ставка: все чаще в строке вакансии будет строка "умеет запускать AI агентов, автоматизировать свою рутину через AI" Или присматривайте навыки / ищите сферы, где - либо высокая физическая ответственность (стройка, сложный ремонт, медицина), - либо более сложная работа (стратегия, ун…
Что можно сделать сейчас: 1 владеть капиталом. • исторически накапливать активы (откладывать какой-то процент и инвестировать) - достаточно часто срабатывал. Если в авангарде прогресса корпорации, то их акции вероятно продолжат генерировать прирост капитала и дивиденды. Конечно не мало компаний по дороге обанкротились и чтобы не потерять деньги, есть разные механизмы например брать индекс акций) Если компания ста…
Предпосылки для разворота уже есть: Некоторые страны уже поняли: чтобы выжить в эпоху ИИ, нужно заманивать людей и капиталы. Португалия: Продолжает стратегию снижения налога на прибыль (corporate tax) на 1% каждый год до 2028, чтобы стать главным IT-хабом Европы. Греция, Кипр, другие страны: внедряют программы для «цифровых кочевников» с фиксированными низкими налогами Специфические льготы: В 2026 году отдельные…
возможно, как всегда, мы сейчас находимся в самой сложной фазе - «долине смерти». Старая экономика (основанная на человеческом труде и нефти) уже умирает и требует всё больше налогов и вливаний, чтобы не рухнуть. Новая экономика (основанная на ИИ и роботах) еще не стала настолько массовой, чтобы обрушить цены на базовые нужды.
На самом деле конечно прогноз выглядит как утопия и сильно зависит от кривой эффективности ИИ В любой момент экспоненциальный график развития ИИ может выйти на плато, а ИИ останется умным-IFTTT (if this then that)... и так и не получится перейти к AGI
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @digitalbudni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,597,970 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marketing Mindset” (@digitalbudni), 2,109 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalbudni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.