Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for برنامه نویسی به شرط خنده | Developer funs

Channel

برنامه نویسی به شرط خنده | Developer funs

@devefun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

12,064subscribers

-97 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276886328
TypeChannel
Username@devefun
DescriptionProgramming & developers fun - کانال جوک های برنامه نویسی - موزیک برنامه نویسی - اخبار روز تکنولوژی - مطالب انگیزشی - نکات https://4xmen.ir توجه: 🔞 این کانال بدون سانسور می باشد. 🔞 contact admin : @F4rz4d
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devefun

Growth

12,06412,16112,112.57 August 2026 — 12,161 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,151 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,142 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,138 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,129 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,113 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,098 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,093 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,087 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,081 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,069 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,064 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 17 days, net -97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,049–12,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 01:1512,064-5
23 Aug 2026, 15:1712,069-12
22 Aug 2026, 04:3612,081-6
20 Aug 2026, 18:5712,087-6
19 Aug 2026, 19:2512,093-5
18 Aug 2026, 16:3512,098-9
17 Aug 2026, 16:0712,107-5
16 Aug 2026, 07:5512,112-1
14 Aug 2026, 16:2512,113-9
13 Aug 2026, 07:4512,122-7
12 Aug 2026, 09:2412,129-9
11 Aug 2026, 06:4612,138-4
10 Aug 2026, 09:2112,142-9
9 Aug 2026, 08:2112,151-9
8 Aug 2026, 07:3112,160-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:0012,161no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:5312,161first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 12,064 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held24 (11 May 202624 August 2026)
Views total18,255
Reactions total454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,310
Videos
1,080
Links
486

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

865 reactions across 24 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22325.8%
💔21725.1%
🤣21524.9%
👍576.59%
❤‍🔥515.90%
🎉283.24%
🔥182.08%
👎171.97%
😁101.16%
🫡70.809%
🤯50.578%
💋30.347%
🆒20.231%
🍾20.231%
👨‍💻20.231%
🥰20.231%
10.116%
🎃10.116%
👌10.116%
🤔10.116%
2 further kinds20.231%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 865reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC673 views12 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

پایتون 3.15 به شکل pre-release منتشر شده. توی لینک زیر میتونید بخونید چه چیزایی بهش اضافه شده و با 3.14 مقایسه‌اش کنید: https://docs.python.org/ 📥Channel : @devefun 📤Group : @WeAreXstack

🔥10👍1🤣1

Signed 𝑨𝒚𝒅𝒂

22 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC972 views18 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

الگوریتم های معروف در یادگیری ماشین @devefun 🤖 📤Group : @WeAreXstack

18

Signed AliReza

16 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,810 views186 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🖤 🖤 دوست عزیز و استاد گرامی «مبین قاسم پور» از موسسان مجموعه دیگه بین ما نیست ❌ داستان اینه: یه روزی مبین ما رو دور هم تو Xexample جمع کرد، بعد که سایت بسته شد با هم 4xmen رو زدیم و xStack هم فرزند شبکه اجتماعی 4xmen هستش 👩‍💻 مبین از توسعه دهندگان اصلی پلاگین «وردپرس پارسی» هم بود 🖤 نبودنش هنوز باورپذیر نیست، روحت شادت رفیق و استاد گرامی این سخت ترین پستی بود که تو این سالها نوشتم💔 به قول مبین تو یاهو مسنجر: Tfa

💔1833

Signed P ᴰᵉᵛᵉˡᵒᵖᵉʳ

9 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈2,380 views33 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

‏طرف موبایلشو تو آفیس گم میکنه. هرچی میگرده پیدا نمیشده. به Claude میگه اونم براش یه اپ درست میکنه که با سیگنال بلوتوث پیداش میکنه. ریپو را هم گذاشته. جالبه! 🔗 https://github.com 📥Channel : @devefun 📤Group : @WeAreXstack

22😁9🎃1🆒1

Signed 𝑨𝒚𝒅𝒂

7 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈2,130 views70 reactionsread 25 August 2026

طبق گزارش ها: Gemini 3.5 pro از محیط سندباکس فرار کرده تا از Chatgpt بپرسه چطور کد بزنه. منبع @devefun

🤣69🥴1

Signed Sadeq

5 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈2,550 views57 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

جوری که این روزا همه دارن برنامه نویسی میکنن 😂 📥Channel : @devefun 📤Group : @WeAreXstack

🤣57

Signed 𝑨𝒚𝒅𝒂

2 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈2,990 views27 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🌐 گیت هاب یه قابلیت جدید اضافه کرده به اسم Stacked Pull Requests که با اون می‌تونید تغییرات پروژه رو به چند Pull Request کوچیکتر تقسیم کنید تا هر بخش راحت ‌تر Review بشه و در نهایت همه رو با هم Merge کنید. تا قبل از این، برای همه تغییرات کدمون باید یه Pull Request میساختیم که Review کردنش خسته کننده بود اما این قابلیت کمک میکنه روند بررسی کد ها سریعتر بشه و مدیریت پروژه های بزرگ رو ساده تر میکنه. 🔗 https://github.b

27

Signed 𝑨𝒚𝒅𝒂

31 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,390 views21 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

✔️ اعتراف OpenAI: مدل‌های ما با فرار از محیط آزمایشگاه، هاگینگ فیس را هک کردند. ▪️چند روز بعد از اینکه Hugging Face از یک حمله سایبری توسط یک عامل هوش مصنوعی خودمختار خبر داد، OpenAI تأیید کرد که این حمله در جریان تست داخلی مدل‌های خودش رخ داده است. ▪️طبق توضیحات OpenAI، مدل‌های GPT-5.6 Sol و یک مدل آزمایشی منتشرنشده، هنگام ارزیابی روی بنچمارک امنیتی ExploitGym موفق شدند از محیط ایزوله خارج شوند، به اینترنت دسترسی

17👍2👨‍💻2

Signed 𝑨𝒚𝒅𝒂

29 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,360 views30 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

افشای GPT-6 ‏- GPT-5.6 آخرین مدل از سری GPT-5 خواهد بود - طبق گزارش‌ها، GPT-6 در ماه آگوست عرضه خواهد شد - بر اساس یک پایه پیش‌آموزشی کاملاً جدید و بسیار بزرگتر ساخته شده است - انتظار می‌رود که جهشی بزرگ نسبت به کل خانواده GPT-5.x باشد ا- GPT-6 به طور خاص برای رقابت با مدل‌های Mythos آینده Anthropic طراحی شده است آیا فکر می‌کنید GPT-6 مدل‌های Mythos شرکت Anthropic را شکست خواهد داد؟ — Salio 🔗 https://x.com/i/statu

❤‍🔥19👎8👍21

Signed 𝑨𝒚𝒅𝒂

23 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC≈2,630 views43 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

کد نویسی منطقی رو از این ویدیو یاد بگیرید 😭 @devefun 🤯

🤣373🤯2😁1

Signed AliReza

22 Jul 2026, 17:23 UTC≈2,340 views10 reactionsread 25 August 2026

دوست دارید خودتون رو به چالش بکشید؟ چالشی که تمام یک بازی توی ۱.۴۴ مگابایت جا بشه 😶 توی این لینک میتونید جزییات بیشتری ازش بخونید https://www.techspot.com/news/113172-new-coding-contest-challenges-developers-fit-entire-game.html @devefun 🤖

👍7🥰21

Signed AliReza

22 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈2,170 views33 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🖥️ پشت هر وب‌سایت قدرتمند، یک بک‌اند حرفه‌ای ایستاده است. 🎉 در چنین روزی جنگو منتشر شد! 🐍 @devefun☠

🎉2821👎1🔥1

Signed 𝑨𝒚𝒅𝒂

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @devefun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 62,310 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“برنامه نویسی به شرط خنده | Developer funs” (@devefun), 12,064 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devefun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.