Kion Music сделали чарт без ИИ треков! Как Вам такой ход?
🔥44❤11🤝8🏆5👌3🍌2🤯1

Channel
@denisovmusic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,113subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001211633290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @denisovmusic |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/denisovmusic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 4,113 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 4,112 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 4,119 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 4,128 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 4,131 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 4,131 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (27 March 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,966 |
| Reactions total | 268 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
613 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 302 | 49.3% | |
| ❤ | 188 | 30.7% | |
| 🤝 | 44 | 7.18% | |
| 🤯 | 31 | 5.06% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 2.61% | |
| 🍌 | 15 | 2.45% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.979% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.653% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 613reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @denisovmusic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Kion Music сделали чарт без ИИ треков! Как Вам такой ход?
🔥44❤11🤝8🏆5👌3🍌2🤯1
Часто вижу в соц сетях как хэйтят чарт. Кто бы не снял на эту тему - ролики залетают и все подключаются накидывать зла на треки. Понятное дело есть музыканты и ценители которые докопаются до любого трека, только вот 90% людей кто слушает музыку это простые люди, которым вообще просто нужен фон для жизни и эти песни идеально сюда заходят. И как то странно получается, тысячи лайков и комментариев, что это плохая музы…
❤14🤝7🍌3👌3
На моем лейбле Twenty One вышел крутой релиз мега талантливого артиста Andro! ⚡️ Получили мощную поддержку на площадках и так же попали на обложку плейлиста Суперлонч в Казахстане. Послушать песню можно тут: https://band.link/VaUGo Буду рад Вашей поддержке ☝️
❤7
9 лет назад вышел хит розовое вино. Трек до сих пор актуальный и держит стриминг. Более того, сами артисты тоже себя чувствую хорошо, у Федука 5М в яндексе и у Элджея 6М. С концертами, деньгами, стримингом у ребят все отлично. Трек у обоих в карточке на первом месте. Важно не выпускать раз в месяц треки, важно выпустить раз в 10 лет мощный хит на всю страну и далее не слить карьеру и все будет хорошо. По поводу миф…
🔥55❤6
Ваня Дмитриенко в 20 лет собрал Лужники, мощно! 💪 Примечательно, что чаще самая большая мечта артиста это собрать стадион. По крайней мере почти все с кем я общался про это говорили. Но мечта опасная, статистически почти невыполнимая. Поэтому когда она все таки сбывается, я очень рад.
❤31
Нужно ли большим артистам часто выпускать музыку? Однозначно нет. Главное каталог хитов и фундамент. Последний сингл HammAli & Navai выходил давно, а стриминг не падает и даже заметил - растёт. Чем больше и чаще выпускать музыку, тем быстрее она обесценивается. Но это относится только к артистам у кого уже есть несколько хитов и тем, кого уже знает вся страна.
❤14
В 2026 году очень сильно решает уникальность и узнаваемость тембра! Это кстати очень важно. Но почему ии так заходит? Потому что вокал suno лучше чем 90% артистов которые начинают выпускать релизы. Это я могу сказать с полной уверенностью, так как материала я слышал очень много. Артист который круто выглядит, круто поет, сам пишет песни и имеет уникальный тембр, такого почти нереально найти!
🤝14❤13🍌5
Video, posted without a caption
⚡4❤3👌1
Привет! Уже несколько месяцев я работаю с артистом JONY. И сегодня у нас вышел очень крутой релиз, так что если вы устали от ии нейрослопа, послушайте реально классную песню с талантливой Tasso: http://band.link/LkQLe
🤯8❤5🔥1
Про ИИ
🔥14🤯8❤6
Мы тут с Дашей Эповой сделали телеграм канал, куда выкладываем песни, которые не выпускаем, но они классные и могли бы найти своего исполнителя. @newmusicsale Почему так? В основном это лирика, а мы сейчас нацелены на танцевальные песни. Лирику выпускаем под новым ии проектом и там уже 350к слушателей. В общем песни Даши моя волна любит! Так что заходите, не теряйте, вдруг понравится. В тоже время мы сами тоже ищ…
🤝5🤯4❤3🏆1
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @denisovmusic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 781,588 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путь к миллиону слушателей” (@denisovmusic), 4,113 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denisovmusic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.