Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Музей Смерти

Channel

Музей Смерти

@death_museum

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,991subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001574262003
TypeChannel
Username@death_museum
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/death_museum

Growth

1,9881,9981,9937 August 2026 — 1,997 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,997 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,995 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,997 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,998 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,994 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,988 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,991 subscribers1,9917 August 20262 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 26 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,987–2,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 21:381,991+3
30 Aug 2026, 09:131,988-6
27 Aug 2026, 00:161,994-4
23 Aug 2026, 19:581,998+1
17 Aug 2026, 18:481,997+2
11 Aug 2026, 16:521,995-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:011,997no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:511,997first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

265 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13550.9%
6323.8%
👍4517.0%
👏124.53%
🎉31.13%
😍31.13%
🥰20.755%
❤‍🔥10.377%
😁10.377%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2025 to 16 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Nov 2025, 17:42 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

10 Mar 2025, 04:26 UTC≈32,700 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://rutube.ru/video/37b601dfdaa24bbb837cba79ee4e5668/?r=wd

17

5 Mar 2025, 14:00 UTC≈30,500 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😉 Друзья! Приглашаем на встречу с писателем Игорем Мараниным! 12 апреля состоится лекция о необычных захоронениях на территории города Новосибирска. ⚰️ Вы узнаете о бесхозном кладбище строителей Комсомольского моста, о забытом склепе инженера Тихомирова, об известных и неизвестных братских могилах времен гражданской войны и о многом другом. Билеты на нашем сайте 👉 https://musei-smerti.ru/lektsiya-igorya-maranina-n

8👍8

4 Mar 2025, 13:41 UTC≈24,900 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На лекции вы услышите: ✅ об истоках некрополистики в России; ✅ о том, какую информацию ищут на кладбищах историки, генеологи и представители других, сопутствующих истории, дисциплин; ✅ о мемориальных символах, способных поведать гораздо больше, чем видно на первый взгляд; ✅ рассказы о памятниках выдающимся людям и о надгробиях тех, кого забыли; ✅ о том, можно ли некрополю стать музеем. А ещё вас ждëт страшно-интере

🔥14👍85👏3

3 Mar 2025, 13:09 UTC≈16,500 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Друзья! В нашей группе ВКонтакте мы разыгрываем "Мифосибирск" с дарственной надписью автора! В ней автор исследует мифы, легенды и городские истории Новосибирска. Уже более 10 лет книга входит в десятку самых продаваемых в местных книжных магазинах. 👉 подробности по ссылке https://vk.com/funeralmuseum?w=wall-24059963_44908

🔥13

3 Mar 2025, 13:06 UTC≈13,200 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://rutube.ru/video/219c45d9774185670bb3d0d2cac80fdd/ ✍️ Всемирный день писателя отмечается 3 марта! По этому случаю у нас есть важное заявление от писателя Игоря Маранина по поводу второй части "Мифосибирска"! Смотрите видео 👆 🤝 Поздравляем Игоря Юрьевича с праздником и желаем творческих успехов!

👏9

26 Feb 2025, 10:26 UTC≈9,170 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👉 В нашей сувенирной лавке новое поступление - бюсты Весталок! #музейсмерти #музейпогребальнойкультуры #весталки #сувенир * Весталки - жрицы богини очага Весты в Древнем Риме, пользовавшиеся большим уважением и почётом. Институт весталок считался основополагающим для безопасности и благополучия Рима. Весталки освобождались от привычных социальных обязанностей, отказываясь вступать в брак и сохраняя целомудрие на вр

🔥276😍3

26 Feb 2025, 03:59 UTC≈6,660 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья! Напомним, что 23 марта 2025 года в нашем музее судебно-медицинский эксперт высшей категории, врач, популярный блогер и писатель Алексей Решетун проведёт лекцию на тему: “Что происходит с телом после смерти: от самых ранних изменений до самых поздних”. ‼️ Количество мест ограничено! 👉 🎟 Билеты можно приобрести по ссылке musei-smerti.ru/lektsiya-a...# 💳 Стоимость билета: 1000 рублей

👍103

25 Feb 2025, 06:45 UTC≈5,590 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://dzen.ru/video/watch/67bd43b0904747545d2751c6?share_to=link

🔥16👍1

25 Feb 2025, 06:44 UTC≈5,050 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://rutube.ru/video/5151ec900fe61cea96a19d3abc2e2eba/

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @death_museum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

МОССУДМЕД 🇷🇺
@reshetunalexey · 39,814
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Музей Смерти” (@death_museum), 1,991 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/death_museum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.