Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дарья Медик

Channel

Дарья Медик

@daryamedic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

3,116subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262920643
TypeChannel
Username@daryamedic
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/daryamedic

Growth

3,1013,1173,1097 August 2026 — 3,101 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,101 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,107 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,108 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,113 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,117 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,116 subscribers3,1167 August 202625 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 19 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,099–3,119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 23:363,116-1
22 Aug 2026, 21:283,117+4
19 Aug 2026, 13:233,113+5
16 Aug 2026, 08:243,108+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:323,107+6
7 Aug 2026, 05:153,101no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:053,101first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 3,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held12 (9 February 202629 July 2026)
Views total1,020
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

427 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22652.9%
🔥17039.8%
👍204.68%
🕊40.937%
🤬30.703%
👏20.468%
🙏10.234%
🥰10.234%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,020 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Почему эрекция пропадает именно при введении? Полный разбор этой темы на ютуб канале 👉 https://youtu.be/zOYgqVrZspg?si=1calqoqUsxaMF7vV

🔥213

24 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,690 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Подскажите что делать? Раньше с эрекцией всё было нормально. Сейчас возбуждение есть, во время ласк эрекция хорошая, но как только начинаю проникновение - она становится слабее. После первой такой ситуации теперь каждый раз жду, что это повторится». Почему эрекция может ослабевать именно после проникновения? 1. Включается тревога Мужчина начинает следить за собой: - достаточно ли жёсткая эрекция; - заметила ли п

12🔥4

30 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC≈2,820 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

а вы какую защиту используете? заказать можно тут

30

26 Jun 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,200 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Выложила новый ролик на ютуб на тему «ПОЧЕМУ МУЖЧИНЫ МАСТУРБИРУЮТ ДАЖЕ В ОТНОШЕНИЯХ» https://youtu.be/ViuQJ46fatI?si=CqUgOmcG62wRNQ9R

🔥21👍32

26 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTC≈2,640 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А вас бы задело, если бы ваш партнер мастурбировал будучи в отношениях?

  1. Да15%
  2. Нет67%
  3. Не знаю17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12

13 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,430 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А У ВАС СНИЖАЕТСЯ ЖЕЛАНИЕ В ДЛИТЕЛЬНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЯХ? Многие уверены, что причина обязательно в гормонах. Или в возрасте. Или в том, что отношения просто себя исчерпали. Но одна из самых распространённых причин снижения либидо вообще связана с другим В новом видео разобрала 10 ОШИБОК, которые могут незаметно снижать сексуальное желание. Возможно, некоторые из них есть и в вашей жизни. 🆎Смотреть: https://youtu.be/j

28👏1

1 May 2026, 12:03 UTC≈4,140 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кейс: «Мне проще мастурбировать, чем заниматься сексом» Так бывает чаще, чем кажется. Мастурбация проще, потому что там нет второго человека. Не нужно подстраиваться, объяснять как тебе нравится, переживать за внешний вид, возбуждение, эрекцию, оргазм или реакцию партнёра. Ты сам контролируешь темп, фантазии, давление, длительность и момент завершения. А секс с партнёром - это уже контакт. Там есть уязвимость, ож

43🔥11👏1🙏1

8 Mar 2026, 05:27 UTC≈4,420 views84 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие девушки, поздравляю вас с прекрасным женским днём 🥰 Хочу пожелать вам чувствовать своё тело, не стыдиться своих желаний и выбирать только ту близость, в которой есть уважение, тепло и отклик 🌸

🔥5423🕊3🤬3🥰1

18 Feb 2026, 15:52 UTC≈4,970 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📱 Выложила новый ролик на ютуб https://youtu.be/YCwgnUBR2ZA?si=xhcU25tOZlAoeSpt

🔥2015

12 Feb 2026, 08:57 UTC≈5,080 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Боль во время ПА 🔞

🔥258👍6

10 Feb 2026, 18:21 UTC≈4,610 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📱 Выложила новый ролик на ютуб https://youtu.be/96a4v8hNwkc?si=qsVpjYWe063eho1m

22🔥8👍3

9 Feb 2026, 14:10 UTC≈3,790 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

28👍8🔥6🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @daryamedic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTCAnonymous Poll371 voters

А вас бы задело, если бы ваш партнер мастурбировал будучи в отношениях?

  1. Да15%
  2. Нет67%
  3. Не знаю17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дарья Медик” (@daryamedic), 3,116 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daryamedic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.