Channel
@darkenchantresswife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1003103313832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darkenchantresswife |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darkenchantresswife |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
20 posts held, back to 16 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
જ⁀➴ у дарк энчантресс куки возник вопрос... кто же все таки её 𝜗𝜚 ࣪* тру кинн ? . . 𐙚 ╰┈➤. это же . . . @darkenchantresswife ! ( 147 гс ) 𓂃 ࣪ ˖ 𖦹 ﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌ ᡣ𐭩 @voiceoflovestirl & @doki_dokimyheart #RULES
Signed [📸🖤]дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
⊹ . ︶ @𝗂𝗿𝗅𝖺𝗻𝗀𝗲𝗅🌟 𝗋𝘂𝗅𝗲𝗌 ˙ ⊹ 🤩нᴇжным ᴀнгᴇлочком Дарк Энчантресс Куки стᴀновится . . 🌟🌟🌟⇆ @darkenchantresswife, нᴀҕᴘᴀв 1081 голос! ˙ . 🤩 ʚ ˚ . 𝖻𝗼𝗈𝘀𝗍 ˙ 🩶 ⊹
Signed [📸🖤]дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
🤩😀😀😀😀😃😃 ❔ГЛАВНЫМ ИРЛ ДУО ДАРК ЭНЧАНТРЕСС & БИСКВЕТ ?!?! СТАНОВИТСЯ . . . @Misaki_not_help & @darkenchantresswife! Набрав... 2 гс!
Signed [📸🖤]#дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
🤩😀😀😀😀😃😃 ❔ГЛАВНЫМ ФАНОМ ДАРК ЭНЧАНТРЕСС КУКИ?!?! СТАНОВИТСЯ . . . @darkenchantresswife! Набрав... 676 гс!
Signed [📸🖤]#дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
Я ещё нашла
Signed [📸🖤]#дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
ㅤㅤ﹝# RESULT ⠀⇄⠀ ＠MAINFAN ↴ : : подводя итоги, главным фанатом dark enchantress cookie становится . . ‹ 𖹭 ⠀↠ ﹫ : @Nuclear_dev набрав 10 голосов ！！
Signed [📸🖤]#дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
જ⁀➴ у Дарк Энчантресс возник вопрос... кто же все таки её 𝜗𝜚 ࣪* плюш ? . . 𐙚 ╰┈➤. это же . . . @darkenchantresswife ! ( 42 гс ) 𓂃 ࣪ ˖ 𖦹 ﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌ ᡣ𐭩 @voiceoflovestirl & @doki_dokimyheart #RULES
Signed [📸🖤]#дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
Нихуя у дочрейн побед
Signed 【🇫🇷🥖🍌】 ɱιʂαƙι ɳρƚ ԋҽʅρ [ sһᥱ / 𝑎𝑛𝑦 ]
જ⁀➴ у Дарк Энчантресс возник вопрос... кто же все таки её 𝜗𝜚 ࣪˖ куколка? . . 𐙚 ╰┈➤. это же . . . @darkenchantresswife ! ( 39 гс ) 𓂃 ࣪ ˖ 𖦹 ﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌ ᡣ𐭩 @voiceoflovestirl & @doki_dokimyheart #RULES
Signed 【🇫🇷🥖🍌】 ɱιʂαƙι ɳρƚ ԋҽʅρ [ sһᥱ / 𝑎𝑛𝑦 ]
જ⁀➴ у Дарк Энчантресс возник вопрос... кто же все таки её 𝜗𝜚 ࣪˖ тру киссер? . . 𐙚 ╰┈➤. это же . . . @darkenchantresswife ! ( 42 гс ) 𓂃 ࣪ ˖ 𖦹 ﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌ ᡣ𐭩 @voiceoflovestirl & @doki_dokimyheart #RULES
Signed 【🇫🇷🥖🍌】 ɱιʂαƙι ɳρƚ ԋҽʅρ [ sһᥱ / 𝑎𝑛𝑦 ]
જ⁀➴ у Дарк Энчантресс возник вопрос... кто же все таки её 𝜗𝜚 ࣪* мечта ? . . 𐙚 ╰┈➤. это же . . . @darkenchantresswife ! ( 51 гс ) 𓂃 ࣪ ˖ 𖦹 ﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌ ᡣ𐭩 @voiceoflovestirl & @doki_dokimyheart #RULES
Signed 【🇫🇷🥖🍌】 ɱιʂαƙι ɳρƚ ԋҽʅρ [ sһᥱ / 𝑎𝑛𝑦 ]
@IRLANGEL❌@REQUEST Нежным ангелочком Дарк Энчантресс Куки становится @Nuclear_dev 🤩набрав 11307 голос
Signed #дочрейн |🍙[𝐍𝐮𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚r 𝐬𝐡𝟏𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯]🍘|
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @darkenchantresswife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“ძᥲrk᥎іძᥱ᥆” (@darkenchantresswife). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darkenchantresswife.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.