Daily dudes pinned «🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱 🇷🇺🔝RADUJNIK RU LIST18+🔝🏳🌈 ⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜ 🔝⚡️ЛУЧШИЕ СЛИВЫ ТИКТОКЕРОВ И ЗНАМЕНИТОСТЕЙ🆕 😱🐾 ПРИВАТКА BONDI 2.0🆕 🚫ДОМАШКА ХУЯСТОГО ПАЦАНА🆕 🍌СПОРТ ПАЦАН С ОГРОМНЫМ ЧЛЕНОМ🆕 🙈ГРЕШНЫЙ ДЕВСТВЕННИК 18+ 👌ЛУЧШАЯ СЕТЬ КАНАЛОВ 🐺ПАРНИ С КАВКАЗА🆕 💦СЕКСИ…»
Channel
Daily dudes
@dailydud
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,677subscribers
+2,341 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003905479877 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dailydud |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 4 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dailydud |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 4,677 | +325 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 4,352 | +319 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 4,033 | +546 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 3,487 | +106 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 3,381 | +106 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 3,275 | +125 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:25 | 3,150 | +45 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 3,105 | +94 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 3,011 | +97 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 2,914 | +73 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 2,841 | +131 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 2,710 | +163 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 2,547 | +155 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 2,392 | +34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 2,358 | +22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 2,336 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 2,336 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱🔱 🇷🇺🔝RADUJNIK RU LIST18+🔝🏳🌈 ⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜⚜ 🔝⚡️ЛУЧШИЕ СЛИВЫ ТИКТОКЕРОВ И ЗНАМЕНИТОСТЕЙ🆕 😱🐾 ПРИВАТКА BONDI 2.0🆕 🚫ДОМАШКА ХУЯСТОГО ПАЦАНА🆕 🍌СПОРТ ПАЦАН С ОГРОМНЫМ ЧЛЕНОМ🆕 🙈ГРЕШНЫЙ ДЕВСТВЕННИК 18+ 👌ЛУЧШАЯ СЕТЬ КАНАЛОВ 🐺ПАРНИ С КАВКАЗА🆕 💦СЕКСИ МОЛОДОЙ ПАРНИШКА🆕 😍The same Yaoi 👅Сочные Пацаны 🥵LOCKED GAYS - Пояс верности 🤩ДРОЧИ СКОЛЬКО УГОДНО🆕 🍆ОБНАЖЁННЫЕ ПАРНИ🆕 🤫ХУЕСОС НА СВЯЗИ 🔥YAOI BEAUTIFUL PORN 🤤РУСС…
Daily dudes pinned a photo
🔝🚫RU РУССКАЯ ПАПКА КАНАЛОВ🔞 🇷🇺RU ПАПКА С ТОПОВЫМИ ГЕЙ КАНАЛАМИ🔞🌤 😱🎁ТОПОВЫЕ КАНАЛЫ И ЧАТЫ НА ТВОЙ ВКУС ОТ КОТОРЫХ ТЫ ТОЧНО ОБКОНЧАЕШСЯ ПОДПИШИСЬ ВСТУПАЙ НИЖЕ ПО ССЫЛКЕ😍 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/zlF-7mzzkg8xOWY0 https://t.me/addlist/zlF-7mzzkg8xOWY0 https://t.me/addlist/zlF-7mzzkg8xOWY0 ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ ❗️ДОБАВЬ СВОЙ КАНАЛ/ЧАТ В ПАПКУ СО СКИДКОЙ ТОЛЬКО СЕГОДНЯ! АДМИН 👉 @papkaadmin
Daily dudes pinned Deleted message
19 y.o texas boy https://t.me/aestetguys More here : @Hotguys21_bot Upon gaining access to the channel, you will get: - 1,000 pieces of content featuring hot guys - Daily updates * Adult content (18+)
🔥4❤3❤🔥1
18 y.o https://t.me/aestetguys More here : @Hotguys21_bot Upon gaining access to the channel, you will get: - 1,000 pieces of content featuring hot guys - Daily updates * Adult content (18+)
❤1❤🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @dailydud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dailydud named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily dudes” (@dailydud), 4,677 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailydud.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.