Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 伊利高檔專屬資訊

Channel

伊利高檔專屬資訊

@d522s4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,261subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002276450226
TypeChannel
Username@d522s4
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/d522s4

Growth

2,2592,2702,264.57 August 2026 — 2,261 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,261 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,259 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,264 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,270 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,269 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,262 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,261 subscribers2,2617 August 202624 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 17 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,257–2,272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 17:372,261-1
20 Aug 2026, 19:232,262-7
17 Aug 2026, 17:472,269-1
14 Aug 2026, 09:142,270+6
11 Aug 2026, 00:312,264+5
8 Aug 2026, 11:052,259-2
7 Aug 2026, 16:322,261no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:242,261first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.4%
avg views ÷ 2,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.193%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total14,119
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
981.8%
🔥19.09%
🥰19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hkk4758

📍#台南8/7特別推薦一個無照隱藏紅牌妹 只有身材密碼介紹,無照可看 小紫 160cm D奶 26歲 45kg 嬌小大奶,服務主動熱情 #價:9000一節 兩節16000 喜歡請來提前密伊利預約✌️ 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO ⭐小姐頻道🔗點擊立即進入【防走失】 https://c.gleezy.top/owG38Ctc

2

4 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC235 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍 如煙 160cm 47kg D+cup 24歲 嬌小大奶皮膚白皙的正妹 長髮柔順輕輕滑過你的身體讓人凍未條 口交技術一流,手技一流 外貌身材技術並存的優質正妹 營業時間:下午13:00-04:00 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

1

2 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC283 viewsread 7 August 2026

📍推薦一個本土女優 #雙北可約 名字:娜娜 160cm 45kg Dcup 30歲 嬌小大奶輕熟女,外貌不錯,有氣質 服務宇宙超級無敵好,尺度大,可配合非常多玩法 今日剛下班第一班,誰來試車 ,密伊利詳細了解 #小刺青 #介意勿約 #嬌小大奶輕熟服務類型 💰原價:原價25000 💰試車:20000 —————————————————————————- 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

1 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC284 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍莎莎 163cm 47kg Ccup 28歲 氣質正妹,皮膚白皙嫩滑 四肢纖細,服務熱情主動不敢時間 可親可LG,可無套口 69 會玩 營業時間:下午13:00-04:00 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

31 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC271 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍晴嵐 164cm 47kg Ccup 28歲 高挑氣質御姐類型,渾身散發成熟女人的韻味 單身很久了,即可難耐下海兼職 誰想要被御姐狠狠疼愛的 營業時間:下午13:00-04:00 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

31 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍淺淺 163cm 47kg Dcup 26歲 笑起來眼睛彎彎的,個性溫柔 很會抓對方敏感點挑逗,服務過程會讓人超舒服 營業時間:下午13:00-04:00 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

1

30 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

子晴 164cm 47kg Ccup 23歲 高挑顏值正妹,皮膚白皙,配合度好 很騷,很會挑逗,女上很會搖,腰力很足 營業時間:下午13:00-04:00 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

30 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC≈8,220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍肉包 157cm Ccup 21歲 嬌小短髮可愛嫩妹 四肢纖細,身體敏感,看一眼就想要抱在懷裡 很活潑的個性,非常好聊,火車便當超輕鬆👍 營業時間:下午13:00-04:00 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

29 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC≈2,540 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍小酒 164cm 47kg C+cup 26歲 星宇空服員下海兼職 外貌正,高挑氣質溫柔,服務主動熱情不敢時間,非常有女友fu 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO ⭐小姐頻道🔗點擊立即進入【防走失】 https://c.gleezy.top/owG38Ctc

2

26 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

晴雨 161cm 46kg C+cup 22歲 床上功夫讓你爽到骨子裏 超級,美胸,皮膚白,可配合,服裝 絲襪,服務內容玩一些 很喜歡奶泡,69,觀音坐蓮 鮑魚很會夾,還會潮吹 營業時間:下午13:00-04:00 📱伊利的TG:@hyp623 🌐LINE賬號:tw4769 ⭐Gleezy賬號:gozAffO

3🔥1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @d522s4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,204,238 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“伊利高檔專屬資訊” (@d522s4), 2,261 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d522s4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.