Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Влад Дьяченко

@d1ak01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,601subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002076553654
TypeChannel
Username@d1ak01
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/d1ak01

Growth

1,6011,6031,60212 Aug 2026, 06:01 — 1,603 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:58 — 1,601 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:0112 Aug 2026, 23:58
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,601–1,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:581,601-2
12 Aug 2026, 06:011,603first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

315 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💊17655.9%
🏆5216.5%
❤‍🔥4313.7%
custom 5467740852413549883278.57%
custom 5215706742645599766175.40%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC304 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня поста не будет По уши в переезде Срочно необходима поддержка реакциями

🏆25❤‍🔥14💊12custom 54677408524135498835custom 52157067426455997663

2 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC344 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ПОЧЕМУ ВСЕ ПСИХОЛОГИ ПИДОРАСЫ? ⌨️ Закончили по 3 универа, десятки курсов прошли, много умных слов узнали, а понту от этого 0 Вот кто взаимодействовал с «психологами» или «терапевтами»? Я пару раз имел такую честь и удивляюсь Призодишь и говоришь что у тебя есть проблема, помоги Начинается длинный набор размышлений и монотонная академическая речь А решение моей проблемы-то где, блять?) ☹️ Как я привык: прише

❤‍🔥7🏆6custom 54677408524135498835

2 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC270 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Привет, давай все начнем сначала, я была не права)

🏆8custom 54677408524135498836custom 52157067426455997664

1 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC272 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

СЕКРЕТ, КОТОРЫЙ СДЕЛАЕТ ТЕБЯ САМЫМ СЧАСТЛИВЫМ НА ПЛАНЕТЕ 📈 Сколько раз ты слышал, что сам факт хотения или не хотения чего-то не является финальным аргументом? Наверняка ты сталкивался с таким, много раз: Я хочу Х — Почему? — А зачем тебе это? — Это же может быть опасно — Ты точно подумал? Весь мир начинает ебать тебе голову своими комментариями, оценками и советами Хотя нахуй тебе это не нужно А как часто

❤‍🔥6🏆6custom 52157067426455997665custom 54677408524135498831

1 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC236 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Какой вайб вы чувствуете от чтения моих постов или любого взаимодействия со мной? Прошу от каждого фидбек 🤓

❤‍🔥6

30 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC274 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чистил канал: 20% читателей оказались ботами, спаммерами или удаленными аккаунтами Если вы подписались случайно, вам не интересно или есть другая причина отсутствия интереса к моей странице — отпишитесь пожалуйста и не тратьте свое время 🤝

❤‍🔥10🏆7💊3custom 52157067426455997662custom 54677408524135498832

30 Jun 2026, 16:10 UTC301 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ПОЧЕМУ ВСЕ НЕУДАЧНИКИ БОЯТЬСЯ, А СОСТОЯТЕЛЬНЫЕ НЕТ? Когда ты поймёшь, насколько сильно ты скован своим страхом — охуеешь 1. Твой страх на 99% не такой страшный как ты думаешь 😳 Если посмотреть вокруг, люди живут в гораздо более трудных и худших условиях и не знают, как оттуда выбраться, но при этом нормально справляются А твоя ситуация даже не проблема, а просто временная трудность И то, что ты боишься сделать

💊8custom 54677408524135498836custom 52157067426455997663

30 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC294 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не пользуйтесь ебаным химозным спф Сегодня был на море, намазался им с дуру, и сейчас весь верх тела чешется Каждая минута — это ад воплоти Когда это закончится…

💊4

28 Jun 2026, 21:32 UTC361 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

П О Х У Й Д Е Л А Й

💊14custom 54677408524135498831

27 Jun 2026, 20:27 UTC349 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На море хорошо отдохнул Будет много реакций — дам завтра волшебную таблетку

💊25

26 Jun 2026, 18:36 UTC397 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Когда ты слышишь любой хейт от менее успешного человека в сторону более успешного человека: Ты общаешься с неадекватом Вместо вопроса: «Почему у него есть, а у меня нет?» Ставиться: «Я обесценю его, так как то, что он говорит, противоречит моим взглядам» И именно здесь кроется ответ, внимательно…

💊14custom 54677408524135498831

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @d1ak01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Арсен Маркарян Официальный
@arsenmarkarian · 160,892
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 174,941
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Влад Дьяченко” (@d1ak01), 1,601 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d1ak01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.