Channel
@curiouser_curiouser
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,994subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001376604312 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curiouser_curiouser |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curiouser_curiouser |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 1,994 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 1,996 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 1,996 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
205 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 192 | 93.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.95% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.976% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If you decide to work to help others, do it with pleasure. 74. If you are hesitating between doing and not doing, take the risk of doing. 75. Do not try to be everything to your spouse; accept that there are things that you cannot give him or her but which others can. 76. When someone is speaking to an interested audience, do not contradict that person and steal his or her audience. 77. Live on money you have ear…
❤21❤🔥4
Gli 82 consigli di Alejandro Jodorowsky per vivere bene e “campare cent’anni”: 1. Ground your attention on yourself. Be conscious at every moment of what you are thinking, sensing, feeling, desiring, and doing. 2. Always finish what you have begun. 3. Whatever you are doing, do it as well as possible. 4. Do not become attached to anything that can destroy you in the course of time. 5. Develop your generosity ‒ b…
❤18⚡2
Qualche giorno fa, in occasione di quello che sarebbe stato il settantesimo compleanno dell’artista e fumettista Andrea Pazienza, il suo nuovo sito è stato messo online. Contiene anche un bellissimo e preziosissimo archivio personale di immagini, fotografie, articoli, disegni, materiali rari e inediti, tutti consultabili. Ci sono anche i suoi disegni da bambino… Lo potete navigare qui: andreapazienza.com
❤41
⠀ Le trame di sicurezza delle buste (quei pattern stampati all'interno che impediscono di vedere il contenuto) esistono dal 1903. Paul Lukas ne analizza diverse per storia, varianti, produttori, curiosità. Un caso classico di estetica incidentale: disegnate per fare una cosa, finiscono per esserne anche un'altra. Qui l'articolo → inconspicuous.info Flickr pieno di pattern → Security Patterns C'è anche un club per s…
❤31
Profilo bellissimo in cui mi sono imbattuta ieri, di soli ricettari italoamericani d’epoca: Sauce on Sunday
❤28🔥3🦄2👍1
Domanda della sera: Preferireste avere su Substack i contenuti di questo canale o va bene se resta qui su Telegram?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
Kikuji Kawada, The Mask, dalla serie Los Caprichos, 1976.
❤20
Serie di costumi-dessert per la commedia Stepping Stones (1923) Fonte: NYPL
❤32👍1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @curiouser_curiouser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Domanda della sera: Preferireste avere su Substack i contenuti di questo canale o va bene se resta qui su Telegram?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 7 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 61,757 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Curiouser and Curiouser!” (@curiouser_curiouser), 1,994 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curiouser_curiouser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.