Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoWallet.com

@cryptowallet_com

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,310subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486929176
TypeChannel
Username@cryptowallet_com
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptowallet_com

Growth

5,3105,3575,333.57 August 2026 — 5,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,352 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,336 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,310 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,303–5,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:155,310-26
10 Aug 2026, 19:185,336-16
7 Aug 2026, 23:245,352-5
7 Aug 2026, 00:005,357first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1828.6%
👍1219.0%
👎812.7%
46.35%
🔥46.35%
🤣46.35%
👏34.76%
🫡34.76%
🍾23.17%
🌚11.59%
💋11.59%
💯11.59%
😈11.59%
😱11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2024 to 21 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2024, 12:00 UTC≈2,090 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Who thinks Telegram's tap-to-earn games are the next big thing in crypto?💎 https://decrypt.co/235797/hottest-telegram-games-earn-crypto

4👍1

19 Aug 2024, 10:12 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Who hasn't joined our socials yet? Keep an eye out for our channels so you don’t miss any updates! Our community is active beyond this platform😉 Join our Discord and Telegram chat. We’re also on LinkedIn, Instagram, and X!

14 Aug 2024, 09:28 UTC≈1,490 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is now the 6th top monetary asset in the world 😎

👎5👍1

9 Aug 2024, 12:00 UTC≈1,470 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Hey guys, what are you doing in the current market? Buying – 🔥 Selling – 👎 Waiting for another dip – 😈 Hodling –🫡

🫡3👎2🔥1😈1

6 Aug 2024, 15:31 UTC≈1,060 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

We have been here before. We will be here again. 🔁 How is your portfolio doing today?

🔥3🌚1👍1👎1

1 Aug 2024, 10:04 UTC994 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Will August be a bullish month for crypto?

  1. YES63%
  2. 🐻38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2024, 11:55 UTC970 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🦎$13M is the Bitcoin base case. 🐻$3M is the worst-case scenario. This is Michael Saylor's vision on the bull and bear case for the future asset price! Where do you see Bitcoin in 21 years? 💬 @cryptowallet_com

25 Jul 2024, 14:05 UTC913 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗺️ Here is the chart of the most popular coins by region for the past month. And guess what? Bitcoin🏆 the OG, undoubtedly. Notcoin: Surprised? The Telegram-based game is #1 in Africa and a solid #2 in both Asia and Europe😮 Hamsterwifhat and Pickle Rick: Who would have imagined they would go this far? 🤣 @cryptowallet_com

23 Jul 2024, 10:31 UTC795 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Yesterday ETH marked 10 years old! The Ether ICO started on July 22, 2014. 🔙 then, ETH was sold for Bitcoin at a rate of 2,000 ETH per 1 BTC: completely permissionless, no VCs, no vesting. 🥳 Today, ETH spot ETFs start trading in the US. Ethereum is now widely recognized as a digital commodity! Cheers to the next 10! 🍻

👏3

22 Jul 2024, 14:44 UTC722 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Do you believe in pro-crypto promises? 🤔

  1. Yes: Potential shift on the horizon69%
  2. No: Its just politics31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2024, 14:02 UTC972 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

That moment when you realize it's just the floors😂

😁5👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptowallet_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2024, 10:04 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

Will August be a bullish month for crypto?

  1. YES63%
  2. 🐻38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2024, 14:44 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Do you believe in pro-crypto promises? 🤔

  1. Yes: Potential shift on the horizon69%
  2. No: Its just politics31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2024 to 21 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 721,303 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoWallet.com” (@cryptowallet_com), 5,310 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptowallet_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.