Posted without readable text

Channel
Crypto Punk
@cryptopunk_tm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,665subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001434736163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopunk_tm |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopunk_tm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 1,665 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 1,666 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 1,667 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 1,667 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 36s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2025 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ТОЛЬКО ЧТО: 🇺🇸 21Shares предлагает добавить стейкинг к своим ETF на базе Ethereum. @Cruptopunk_TM
📊 Приток криптовалюты: 2025-02-03 💰 ETF BTC: -$234,4 млн 📉 💰 ETH ETF: $83,6 млн 📈 @Cryptopunk_TM
😨 Эрик Трамп: «На мой взгляд, сейчас самое подходящее время для докупки токенов #ETH. Вы можете поблагодарить меня позже.» Эрик Трамп — один из сыновей Дональда Трампа… @Cryptopunk_TM
🔥 СРОЧНО: 🇺🇸 World Liberty Finance Трампа купила 86 000 $ETH 💎 за последние 7 часов. Общая сумма активов $WLFI теперь составляет 422 миллиона долларов, а доля $ETH составляет 65%. @Cryptopunk_TM |
💸 Компания Дональда Трампа World Liberty Finance докупила #ETH еще на 10,000,000$ – spotonchain @Cryptopunk_TM
🔥 James Seyffart: Компания Tuttle Capital подала заявки в SEC на 10 различных криптовалютных ETF с кредитным плечом – на #XRP, #SOL, #TRUMP, #LTC, #MELANIA, #BNP, #BONK, #ADA, #LINK и #DOT. @Cryptopunk_TM
🚨 ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ : Поддерживаемая Трампом компания World Liberty Financial теперь владеет криптовалютой на сумму более 390 млн долларов. По данным Arkham Intelligence, его крупнейшим активом является Ethereum с 55 833 $ETH на сумму 181,05 млн долларов США. @Cryptopunk_TM
#Ethereum #ETH Рост открытого интереса указывает на неминуемый прорыв вверх цены ETH. Источник @Cryptopunk_TM | Главное о крипте
🔥 БЫЧИЙ ТОНУС : Сенатор Синтия Ламмис говорит: «Я же говорила вам, что это год для биткоина и цифровых активов». @Cryptopunk_TM
❕СЕГОДНЯ : Поддерживаемая Трампом компания World Liberty Financial купила еще 3079 $ETH на сумму 10 млн долларов и 10,61 млн $TRX на сумму 2,65 млн долларов. В настоящее время он содержит 55 625 $ETH и 40,72 млн $TRX @Cryptopunk_TM
#Трамп #указы #крипта Трамп подписал указы, касающиеся криптовалют Дональд Трамп подписал указ о создании национального крипторезерва, а также о создании рабочей группы по криптовалютам, которая займется формированием нормативно-правовой базы для криптоиндустрии. Дэвид Сакс возглавит эту рабочую группу. В ее состав также войдут министр финансов и председатель SEC. Указ Трампа также запрещает создание и продвижение C…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptopunk_tm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptopunk_tm named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Punk” (@cryptopunk_tm), 1,665 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopunk_tm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.