Channel
@cryptonotebo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,631subscribers
+421 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002905948541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptonotebo |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptonotebo |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 12:01 | 3,631 | +37 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 3,594 | +58 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 3,536 | +55 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 3,481 | +33 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 3,448 | +36 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 3,412 | +27 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 3,385 | +36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 3,349 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 3,332 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 3,322 | +43 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 3,279 | +15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 3,264 | +16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 3,248 | +30 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 3,218 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 3,209 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 3,210 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 34.6% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 11.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Crypto Notebook 🐋 Today's Signal, July 31, 2026 📉 BTC is down 1.3% to ~$63,870 today, and here's what's actually interesting: it's moving in the opposite direction of stocks. South Korea's Kospi jumped 15% and Nasdaq futures rose too, while crypto fell. 🧠 In plain terms: for the past two weeks, crypto has mostly ignored bad news in stocks (remember the chip crash it shrugged off). Today it's doing the reverse, ign…
Active VC firms have collapsed by 87% since the peak, and now the exact same feeds are panicking that venture is "dead" and protocols can't survive. CT will literally complain about the solution to their own problems🎯 We claim we want a community-first market, but the second institutional money dries up, everyone acts like the world is ending. If your thesis relies on VC liquidity to pump your bags, you’re not build…
👍1
Crypto Notebook 🐋 Today's Signal, July 29, 2026 📊 BTC is holding near $64,350, and here's the headline that matters most today: "Bitcoin rises toward $64,000 as Korea's record chip crash leaves crypto untouched." 🧠 In plain terms: South Korea's stock market just triggered back to back circuit breakers, an 8% single day crash is rare and serious. Normally, a shock that big in a major market ripples into crypto too.…
❤2👍1
Altcoins bleeding disproportionately harder on minor BTC drawdowns ahead of macro catalysts. bitcoin drops 2% and altcoin charts look like a localized nuclear disaster 💀 if your portfolio can't survive a routine $63k chop before fomc, you didn't buy crypto, you bought stress with extra steps 🤝🍿
😭3😁1
Crypto Notebook 🐋 Today's Signal, July 26, 2026 BTC sits at $64,466 today, well off the $66,910 high it hit just five days ago. In plain terms: this past week followed a clean pattern, buyers pushed price up from $64,700 to nearly $67,000, then sellers took back control and dragged it into the low $64,000s. That's a rejection at resistance, not a breakdown, an important distinction. What's quietly telling: ETF flo…
Bitcoin holding around $64k–$65k despite macro turmoil, oil market swings, and general panic on traditional finance timelines. macro timeline is screaming about oil hitting $100 and economic doom, while bitcoin is literally just vibing at $64k like nothing happened. the market is refusing to break, but everyone is still too scared to buy. classic crypto chop.
❤3👍1
🐋 Today's Signal, July 24, 2026 Here's something worth sitting with: yesterday, almost $800 billion vanished from the world's biggest tech companies. Bitcoin barely moved. Let's unpack why that's interesting. For most of this year, crypto has traded like a shadow of the AI trade, when tech stocks worried about AI spending, Bitcoin worried too. Yesterday broke that pattern. Tesla fell 14%, Alphabet fell 7%, and BTC …
👍2
Funny how one green candle creates experts... and one red candle creates doom posts. meanwhile, ETF money has quietly kept flowing in all week. 👀
👍1😁1
Crypto Notebook 🐋 Today's Signal, July 18, 2026 📊 BTC is holding near $63,898, essentially flat, after a rough week driven by Iran conflict headlines. 🧠 In plain terms: the options market just gave us a real clue. For six months, the most popular bullish bet was a $80,000 target. That's now shifted down to $70,000, while the $60,000 "safety net" bet remains the most crowded downside position. 🔍 Why this matters: o…
❤1👍1
Crypto Notebook 🐋 Today's Signal, July 17, 2026 📉 BTC slipped to ~$63,130, giving back its brief move above $65,000 this week as a sixth straight day of US-Iran conflict weighed on risk assets. 🧠 In plain terms: Bitcoin has now had two consecutive bearish daily sessions and four straight bearish 4 hour candles, that's a real losing streak forming, not just noise. 🔍 What's notable: ETF inflows have actually reboun…
❤2👍1
Remember when everyone said bitcoin would never become mainstream? now the debate isn't whether it'll survive... it's whether people will ever actually spend it 😂
😁2
🐋 Today's Signal, July 11, 2026 📈 BTC extended its bounce to $64,163, up 1.4%, marking a second straight day of recovery. 🧠 In plain terms: two green days in a row after a rough stretch is a meaningful signal, one bounce could be noise, two starts to look like a trend forming. 🔍 What's quietly shifting: Strategy, one of the biggest corporate BTC holders, sold shares to fund dividends instead of just hoarding, its …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptonotebo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Notebook” (@cryptonotebo), 3,631 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptonotebo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.