Channel
@cryptomoneyglobal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
19,404subscribers
-2,174 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001572727631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptomoneyglobal |
| Description | The top News About Crypto Projects, Market, investment. Contact us: @kevinmxt |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptomoneyglobal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 19,404 | -24 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 19,428 | -59 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 19,487 | -99 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 19,586 | -165 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 19,751 | -115 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 19,866 | -409 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 20,275 | -156 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 20,431 | -145 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 20,576 | -137 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 20,713 | -187 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 20,900 | -194 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 21,094 | -156 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 21,250 | -194 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 21,444 | -134 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 21,578 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (20 February 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,880 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Zcash has officially hit its highest price in 8 years. $ZEC surged 47% to $865, a level it hasn't seen since January 2018, per CoinDesk. In June it crashed to $250 after an AI discovered a critical counterfeiting vulnerability that had been live for four years. It has now rallied 3.4x from that low. The rally accelerated after Grayscale filed to convert its Zcash Trust into the first U.S. spot ZEC ETF, per The Bl…
⛏️ MARA Sold 23,093 BTC for $1.63B in Six Months MARA Holdings, the largest U.S. Bitcoin miner, sold 23,093 BTC worth approximately $1.63B during the first half of 2026, at an average price of around $70,600 per BTC. 🧐 The company says the proceeds were used to fund operations, business expansion, and maintain liquidity. Despite the massive sales, MARA still held 35,577 BTC worth roughly $2.08B at the end of June.…
Whale 0xC8b5, who lost over $1M on each of the previous three trades, is taking another big loss on $SKHX. The whale went long on 37,229 $SKHX ($34.28M) yesterday and is now down $2.26M.
Institutional sentiment toward Bitcoin has turned extremely bearish According to CryptoQuant, institutional investors are now showing their highest level of pessimism about Bitcoin's upside in the past two years! Historically, extreme bearish sentiment from large market participants has often appeared near major turning points. While it doesn't guarantee a reversal, it does suggest that expectations have become hea…
📊 Wu Blockchain compared Bitcoin bear market bottom forecasts from banks, research firms, and major crypto influencers. Most institutional estimates cluster around two key ranges: $50K–60K and $40K–46K. 🔹 Standard Chartered believes the bottom may have already formed near $59K. 🔹 Galaxy Research expects BTC could still revisit the $40K–46K range. Predictions below $40K are generally tied to severe recession scenar…
🆕 #TRX Tron’s quantum-resistant signature feature is now live on the testnet, says Justin Sun.
🆕 Bitcoin Cycle Momentum Indicates the Bear Market is Not Over Yet Historically, this range (-30) has formed the main support levels for #BTC. However, to confirm a trend reversal, the price must form a bullish pattern with the indicator breaking above the Neutral zone.
🔥INSTITUTIONS “LOVE BTC EVEN MORE” AT LOWER PRICES Coinbase’s John D’Agostino says family offices and sovereign wealth funds are still accumulating the dip, dismissing fears of institutional panic.
GRAYSCALE: CLARITY ACT COULD BOOST ETH, SOL, BNB AND CANTON Grayscale says the Clarity Act and SEC guidance could accelerate tokenized assets and DeFi. The firm says Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, and Canton Network may benefit most from clearer rules.
💰 Long-term Bitcoin holders have been accumulating for 5 consecutive months in 2026 — even while BTC kept bleeding along Q1 That’s what makes the data interesting. The market wasn’t euphoric. There was no “supercycle” sentiment, no retail mania, and no convincing signs of a macro top. Instead, BTC spent months drifting lower while fear dominated timelines. Yet during that entire period, long-term holders kept abso…
THE S&P 500 WITHOUT AI TELLS A VERY DIFFERENT STORY From May 2024 to June 2026, the S&P 500 soared 142%. But excluding AI stocks, the broader market gained just 16%. The gap highlights how a handful of AI giants are driving nearly all market gains, fueling growing concerns that the current bull market is becoming dangerously reliant on the AI trade alone.
Stablecoins are looking for a new name a16z believes stablecoins may need a new public image. The reason is that their role has long moved beyond crypto trading. Today, they are used for payments, transfers, settlements, and financial applications.
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @cryptomoneyglobal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Money” (@cryptomoneyglobal), 19,404 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomoneyglobal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.