Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Hunters 🅒

Channel

Crypto Hunters 🅒

@crypnews247

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,560subscribers

-6,033 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001241352381
TypeChannel
Username@crypnews247
DescriptionОперативные новости и котировки из мира криптовалют. Быстрые новости📱 Реклама - предложения @vr777
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypnews247

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,56035,59332,576.57 August 2026 — 35,593 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,569 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,430 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,136 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,052 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,006 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,957 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,778 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,614 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,272 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,116 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,942 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,870 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,811 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33,581 subscribers24 August 2026 — 33,507 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,323 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,278 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,196 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,119 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,869 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,833 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,508 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,427 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,347 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,083 subscribers6 September 2026 — 32,048 subscribers10 September 2026 — 31,801 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,399 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,046 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,918 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,564 subscribers27 September 2026 — 29,846 subscribers5 October 2026 — 29,560 subscribers7 August 20265 October 2026
34 measurements spanning 59 days, net -6,033. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,655–36,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 00:1629,560-286
27 Sept 2026, 18:3929,846-718
17 Sept 2026, 20:1830,564-354
15 Sept 2026, 17:1630,918-128
13 Sept 2026, 21:5731,046-353
12 Sept 2026, 07:3731,399-402
10 Sept 2026, 04:3631,801-247
6 Sept 2026, 18:4132,048-35
4 Sept 2026, 03:4132,083-264
2 Sept 2026, 14:5732,347-80
1 Sept 2026, 12:2532,427-81
31 Aug 2026, 15:2432,508-325
30 Aug 2026, 16:2732,833-36
29 Aug 2026, 19:5732,869-250
28 Aug 2026, 20:5833,119-77
27 Aug 2026, 19:3333,196-82
26 Aug 2026, 16:2333,278-45
25 Aug 2026, 18:3433,323-184
24 Aug 2026, 20:4833,507-74
23 Aug 2026, 05:1633,581first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.7%
avg views ÷ 29,560 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,200
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.008%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held33 (12 December 2025 – 9 September 2026)
Views total13,200
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Oct 2026, 16:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,470
Videos
≈35
Links
≈1,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 35s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,012 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,62832.5%
❤1,00420.0%
👾96219.2%
🤯52710.5%
🔥4428.82%
🐳4038.04%
🏆460.918%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,012 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC≈13,200 views1 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

💲 Главный КРИПТОРЕГИОН — ЭТО... ...нет, не США Ближний Восток сейчас ближе всех к реальному принятию крипты ⬆️ Годовой объём ончейн-транзакций в регионе вырос со $100 млрд в 2022 году до $350 млрд в 2025–2026 Всё потому, что именно там крипту используют, чтобы сохранить стоимость денег, обойти проблемы с банками и провести перевод через границу Похоже, настоящий массадопшен начинается там, где он действительно ну…

❤1

8 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC≈13,200 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

💸 TRX ВЫХОДИТ НА УОЛЛ-СТРИТ Управляющая компания Canary Capital готовит к запуску первый в США Staked TRX ETF под тикером TRX 💰 Фонд будет следить за стоимостью TRX и одновременно отправлять монеты в стейкинг Но холдерам рано открывать шампанское, точной даты торгов пока нет 😐 #TRON #TRONGlobalFriends #TGF

6 Sept 2026, 09:42 UTC≈13,400 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🪙 TON станет ЕЩЁ быстрее? Разработчики проверили, как сеть справляется с огромным количеством одновременных переводов 🌐 На пике через TON проходило около 1500 операций в секунду. Сеть не упала, блоки продолжили выходить, хотя сами переводы стали проходить немного медленнее Теперь разработчики хотят увеличить скорость ещё сильнее. Следующая цель — 2000 операций в секунду С одной стороны, молодцы, хоть кто-то в TON…

31 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈13,200 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🐳 Кит начал открывать лонги по ETH 4 дня назад и имеет в настоящее время 8х лонг на 45 087 ETH ($108,92 млн). Нереализованный убыток в настоящее время составляет $3,2 млн.

28 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈13,500 viewsread 8 October 2026
Video

Неизвестный инвестор лишился криптоактивов примерно на 25,6 млн $, злоумышленнику потребовалось всего около 15 минут, чтобы опустошить два его кошелька. Но самое интересное, это уже не первая крупная потеря этого инвестора. В 2023 году он лишился ещё 24,2 млн $ после того, как подписал вредоносное разрешение, позволившее злоумышленнику списать токены. Получается, за несколько лет один и тот же инвестор оказался жер…

28 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈13,300 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

😂 Фиксируем прибыль, Донни Американские активисты подсчитали убытки инвесторов от криптопроектов семьи Трампа 📉 Инвесторы в TRUMP, WLFI, NFT и другие проекты его семьи в общем потеряли более $4,7 млрд Только на TRUMP около миллиона из 1,6 млн кошельков оказались в минусе. Зато верхний 1% забрал 80% всей прибыли Сам же Трамп только за 2025 год заработал минимум $1,4 млрд 🇺🇸

27 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈13,600 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

«Умоляю, ещё всего один булл ран, и я обещаю зафиксить, хотябы в небольшой минус»

26 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈13,400 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🫡Трейдер упустил >$2 млн прибыли на PONS. Он потратил всего 0,25 ETH ($610) на покупку 19,98 млн PONS, а затем продал их за 0,47 ETH ($1 166), получив прибыль всего в $556. Теперь эти 19,98 млн PONS стоят $2,2 млн.

25 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈13,300 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

😄 КАЙЛИ ДЖЕННЕР СКАМАНУЛА КРИПТАНОВ Хакеры угнали её X-аккаунт с 39,5 млн подписчиков и пропиарили оттуда свежий токен на Солане 📈📉 Монету быстро разогнали до $1,2 млн, а потом так же быстро укатали ниже $120 000 Никого эта схема уже не удивляет. Думаю, большинство лезло в этот скам осознанно, надеясь успеть закрыться до рага А вот сколько из них реально успело выйти... Другой вопрос 🤣

25 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈13,300 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

Почти 1.000.000$ за номер +8888666. Только что премиальный номер +8888666 продали за 950.000$ По данным Heritage, изначально NFT был выпущен ещё в 2022 году всего за 31.000$.

25 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC≈13,400 viewsread 8 October 2026
Photo

💰 Биткоин вновь пробивает 80.000$ Вся Крипта растёт, Gram опять отстаёт 🥵

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @crypnews247. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Hunters 🅒” (@crypnews247), 29,560 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypnews247.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.