在 Telegram 里找内容,先打开 SOSO 搜搜。 频道、群组、帖子、贴纸都可以搜;也可以从发现页继续浏览。

Channel
老司机AppTool破解软件-老司机基地📱
@crack520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,705subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002175364232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crack520 |
| Description | 老司机AppTool吾爱破解是你喜欢的福利破解软件大全!分享精品软件、绅士游戏、破解VPN等内容. 新频道 @xds55 后续这里边更新 电报综合服务导航 @xdnavi 广告/破解/反馈 @xso44bot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crack520 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 23,705 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 23,709 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 23,707 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 23,702 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 23,697 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 23,709 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 23,708 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 23,708 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.90%
- avg views ÷ 23,705 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,870
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.05%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 39,312 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈20
- Links
- ≈2,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 57.1% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
TG必备搜索引擎,TG中文搜索 🔍 中文搜索 @xsou360 轻松帮您找到有趣的群、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻。 👇👇点击下方按钮,快速搜索👇👇
❤2
SOSO 搜搜 把 Telegram 搜索和发现放在一个入口。 想继续找频道、群组、帖子或贴纸,直接输入关键词。 也可以从发现页继续浏览同类入口。
👉友情提示: 👉本频道APK软件仅支持安卓系统移动设备! 👉破解版仅支持以下情况: 👉【解锁专业版】 👉【解锁会员版】 👉【去除APK广告】 👉【解锁高级版】 👉【去除APK弹窗】 等常规破解需求! 频道主导航:@xdsnavi(内容丰富,满足你的各种色彩选择) @xdsapp @xdsoso @xdsxing @xds55 |-APK破解 |-TG中搜索 |-两性教学 |-LSP破解 @xdsvpn @xdsapp @xdspan @xdsnavi |-免费节点 |-安卓破解 |-网盘分享 |-导航服务 👉…
🥹【XDS综合服务导航】🥹 🥹【🔞麻豆视频】 🥹【🔞直播精选】 🥹 【🔞Apk破解】 🥹【🔞两性教学】 🥹 【广告投放】 苹果用户无法观看成人内容请点击 😅 ✅解除限制✅😅
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
https://t.me/+We7iAilxXHw0YjQ9
File, posted without a caption
👎1
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @crack520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@xdsnavi · 502 posts精品AV 女优 剧情 🔞🈲
@kaiyunt0 · 151,9311 post欧美无码|OnlyFans|推特❤️❤️
@sucai145 · 123,0251 post老司机破解软件-XDS破解基地🔴
@xds114 · 5201 post老司机破解软件-XDS破解基地📱
@xds55 · 2,8271 post安卓破解软件-XDS破解基地🌍
@xdsapp · 9011 postXDS网盘资源分享
@xdspan · 141 post免费VPN节点分享-XDS分享基地🌍
@xdsvpn · 8871 postXDS两性教学频道🏆
@xdsxing · 371 post【越南车站】
@xiuche1113 · 281 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“老司机AppTool破解软件-老司机基地📱” (@crack520), 23,705 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crack520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.