Channel
@cosm_horror10
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,742subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002221990753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cosm_horror10 |
| Description | 📌 Ссылка для друга https://t.me/+Hea8Dd8Uba1hN2U6 🔥 Запаска https://t.me/+K4iHtMdtyDs5NzQy 🔥 Инст - www.instagram.com/cosm_horror ⚕️Вопросы - @MotherCosmoBot Информация из открытых источников. Фантазируем, на истину НЕ претендуем |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cosm_horror10 |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:22 | 16,742 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (6 November 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 46,870 |
| Reactions total | 2,344 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,344 reactions across 12 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5458623611801717806 | 729 | 31.1% | |
| 🤣 | 624 | 26.6% | |
| 😁 | 366 | 15.6% | |
| 😱 | 76 | 3.24% | |
| 💯 | 72 | 3.07% | |
| custom 5325689756900700126 | 69 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5458518763060087439 | 64 | 2.73% | |
| 🤮 | 58 | 2.47% | |
| custom 5199846115616238910 | 48 | 2.05% | |
| 🤔 | 45 | 1.92% | |
| custom 5332502120492998414 | 40 | 1.71% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 1.45% | |
| 👀 | 21 | 0.896% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 0.896% | |
| 🌭 | 19 | 0.811% | |
| custom 5327848647981836356 | 16 | 0.683% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 0.597% | |
| custom 5197345577066571387 | 12 | 0.512% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 0.341% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.213% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 0.128% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,344 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Амбассадор красоты, которого мы заслужили. Иосиф Пригожин похудел на Тирзетте, а теперь еще и лицо аппаратиками подтягивает
custom 545862361180171780622🤣17custom 545851876306008743910👀4custom 53256897569007001264custom 53278486479818363562
Для комментариев
custom 532568975690070012613🤔3
Вопрос из лички: Здравствуйте! Меня уже несколько дней пожирает мысль - могут ли такие бедра быть природными или это липофилинг и/или фильтры? А, можно , генетика? 🤨Просто я не вижу особо развитого квадрицепса или задней поверхности бедра, чтобы списать на спорт. И такой мягкий переход без hips dips... Буду очень рада, если подскажете Ответ: это трусы с накладками. Носят в СНГ такие? В США поголовно все в них.
😁45🔥16🌭15custom 51998461156162389109custom 51973455770665713873🗿1
У меня много таких историй ) Еще однажды был пациент с гинекомастией (когда у мужчин развивается грудь по женскому типу). Он ДО хирургической коррекции занимался сексом исключительно только с поднятыми вверх руками. Потому что стеснялся сосков, которые "клевали" в сторону пола и потрясывались во время процесса. Коррекцию ему сделали лет в 40. Вот сколько лет мужик делал это не покладая рук.
😁142custom 545862361180171780663🤣38😢21❤🔥4custom 53256897569007001264🌭1custom 54585187630600874391
Однажды в клинике, где я работала тоже был пациент-мужчина, который пришел на учеличение ягодиц филлерами. Тогда эта процедура только появилсь и вообще мало кто о ней знал и делал. Этот же пациент целенаправленно искал в интернете именно увеличение ягодиц гиалуроновыми филлерами. Мужик начал разговор с того, что он стрейт и вообще очень стесняется данной манипуляции. Но решил сделать, так как мужики в бане застебал…
🤣277😁52🤔17custom 532784864798183635614🤯6🌭3
Только не говорите, что Алена Николаевна проводит коррекцию своему хорошему другу Сердару Камбарову...
custom 545862361180171780671custom 532568975690070012629🤮9custom 51998461156162389103😁2👀1
Ещё можно пипеткой липосакцию сделать! Можно много чего придумать, когда ты фантазёрка а не медик
custom 5458623611801717806104😱28custom 533250212049299841425custom 519984611561623891012🤬2🤯2👀1custom 53256897569007001261
Говорят, это образ невинной невесты
custom 5458623611801717806220🤣97🤮33custom 532568975690070012611🌚8🤯6custom 53325021204929984146👀2
В пабликах пишут: Люба Успенская испугала страшным шрамом за ухом. Какой-то коновал очень небрежно сделал ей подтяжку лица А каким должен быть рубец при подтяжке? Особенно, если это вторичная \ третичная операция.
💯72🤔25custom 51973455770665713879custom 53256897569007001262custom 54586236118017178062❤🔥1
Вот чего не хватает зубам из предыдущего поста - дельфиньей кожи
😁116custom 545862361180171780668🤮15👀10custom 54585187630600874395
Молю, не показывайте это Прохору Шаляпину
🤣195custom 545851876306008743941custom 545862361180171780619🔥18😁8custom 53256897569007001263custom 53325021204929984142🤮1
Вот как хорошо стало!
custom 5458623611801717806160😱48custom 519984611561623891024custom 53325021204929984147custom 54585187630600874397👀3custom 53256897569007001262😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @cosm_horror10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❌Хеллоу, косметолог - все на базу❌” (@cosm_horror10), 16,742 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosm_horror10.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.