Channel
@cos668
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
103,630subscribers
+20,492 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1003664465246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cos668 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cos668 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 103,630 | +430 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 103,200 | -418 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 103,618 | +186 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 103,432 | +641 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 102,791 | +19,653 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 83,138 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,332 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 72.2% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 27.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👉🏿点击查看 【最新作品】 👈🏿 ⭐️我们承诺不满意全额退款⭐️ 原创作品 【学生 萝莉 少女 女儿】 真实自拍自慰手淫高潮 微信裸聊射精 真实开房操学生 朋友妻 【操兄弟 朋友的老婆 猥亵女儿】 自己的阿姨妈妈 偷情绿帽自己老公老婆 监控下的 【偷窥萝莉女儿自慰 单身妈妈手淫】 父母日常做爱 偷情近亲守着孩子做爱 原创 全网最全更新原创ai短剧 覆盖全网 最新原创 定制 最新流出作品 唯一24小时自助机器人 https://t.me/shaonvfangbot
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
❤2
Posted without readable text
【在下王老师酒店开发19岁学生妹 气质甜美操起来娇糯酥麻 全程求饶直呼太深了】 在下王老师最近在酒店开发了个19岁学生妹长相甜美一看就是那种看起来乖乖的类型结果真操起来完全是另一回事娇糯的身子又软又紧弄两下就酥麻得直抖 #在下王老师 #学生妹 #颜值 #网红 #少女
【swaiill符文网红线下约啪福利 口舌侍奉唾液拉丝 后入肥臀吊钟奶激烈甩动】 swaiill高颜值纹身网红线下约炮金主视频流出这妹子可真是天生的荡货啊火辣丰腴的身材搭配上美艳的长相骨子里透露出的骚气让人隔着屏幕都能感受到尤其是被金主后入暴操的画面 #swaiill #口交 #颜值 #网红 #少女
【欧阳琴快手64万粉网红黑料合集淫荡御姐自拍骚舞勾引约炮 无套打桩猛操浪叫不断】 欧阳琴快手64万粉丝网红黑料合集流出顶级御姐日常穿JK或礼服清纯可人私拍视频里却彻底放开丝袜骚舞扭腰摆臀肥美臀部被丝袜紧紧包裹无毛小肥穴粉嫩饱满 #欧阳琴 #白虎 #内射 #网红 #肥臀
【妲己抖音擦边网红首发露脸福利 曲线夸张令人窒息 跳蛋狂震湿滑蜜穴】 妲己抖音擦边网红小号叫小姐己吖首次露脸福利震撼流出这妹子长得那叫一个清纯啊火辣白嫩的胴体前凸后翘一对圆润挺翘的玉乳挂在胸前十分诱人 #露脸 #网红 #颜值 #制服 #萝莉
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
❤1
Posted without readable text
❤1
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @cos668. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@cos668 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“网红 少女 高颜值” (@cos668), 103,630 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cos668.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.