Channel
@contentyabinfo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,371subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002104711135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @contentyabinfo |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/contentyabinfo |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 1,371 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 1,369 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 1,368 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 1,370 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:04 | 1,368 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 1,365 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 1,366 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 1,365 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 1,359 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 1,362 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 1,361 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 1,363 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 1,363 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 1,364 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۵. نشون بده، تعریف نکن به جای اینکه بگی: "محصولمون کیفیت بالایی داره." یه داستان تعریف کن که کیفیت خودش معلوم بشه. مثلاً: "بعد از دو سال استفاده، هنوز مثل روز اول کار میکنه." #داستانسرایی
❤1
۴. جزئیات، داستان رو واقعی میکنن به جای اینکه بگی: "یه مشتری داشتم..." بگو: "سهشنبه ساعت ۱۰ صبح یه خانم بهم پیام داد و گفت..." یا "وقتی در کارتن محصول رو باز کرد، اولین جملهای که گفت این بود..." جزئیات باعث میشه مغز باور کنه داستان واقعیه. #داستانسرایی
❤1
۳. احساس، قبل از منطق میفروشه اول احساس ایجاد کن، بعد دلیل بیار. مردم اول با احساس تصمیم میگیرن و بعد با منطق از تصمیمشون دفاع میکنن. پس سعی کن احساسهایی مثل: امید ترس از دست دادن هیجان حس موفقیت آرامش اعتماد رو داخل داستانت ایجاد کنی. #داستانسرایی
❤1
۲. داستان بدون مشکل، داستان نیست. هر داستان خوب با یه درد شروع میشه. از خودت بپرس: 👇 مخاطب الان با چی درگیره؟ شبها به خاطر چی فکرش مشغوله؟ از چی میترسه؟ از چی خسته شده؟ وقتی درد رو خوب توصیف کنی، مخاطب میگه: «دقیقا داره از من حرف میزنه.» #داستانسرایی
❤1
۱. قهرمان داستان، تو نیستی؛ مخاطبه اشتباهی که خیلی از برندها میکنن اینه که مدام از خودشون میگن. ❌ ما بهترینیم... ❌ ما فلان سال سابقه داریم... ❌ محصول ما عالیه... درحالی که مخاطب فقط یه سوال داره: «این به درد من میخوره یا نه؟» تو فقط نقش راهنما رو داری؛ مثل مربی یا کسی که راه رو نشون میده. #داستانسرایی
❤2
آدمها محصول نمیخرن، داستانی که پشت محصوله رو میخرن!!! داستان خوب کاری میکنه که مخاطب به جای اینکه فقط محتوا ببینه، خودش رو داخل اون محتوا تصور کنه. این دقیقا همون چیزیه که باعث میشه برندت تو ذهنش بمونه. اما میخوام بهت بگم دقیقا چیکار کنی که با داستان سرایی مخاطب جذب کنی و فروشت رو افزایش بدی...😍 #داستانسرایی @contentyabinfo 🧡
❤3
۵. پشت صحنه ساخت با AI خیلیها دوست دارن بدونن این شخصیت چطور ساخته میشه. مثلاً: قبل و بعد مراحل ساخت اشتباهات خندهدار AI خرابکاریهای هوش مصنوعی #کسبوکار_پولساز #ai
👍1
۴. "اگر ... انسان بود" ✅مثلاً: اگر ChatGPT انسان بود... اگر وایفای انسان بود... اگر گوگل همسایهات بود... اگر هوش مصنوعی رئیس شرکت بود... #کسبوکار_پولساز #ai
❤1
۳. طنز روزمره این یکی تقریباً همیشه جواب میده. ✅مثلاً شخصیتت: میره بانک میره آرایشگاه میره تاکسی میره دانشگاه میره اداره و اتفاقات خندهدار براش میافته. #کسبوکار_پولساز #ai
❤1
بریم سراغ روش بعدی... ۲. واکنش به ترندها هر اتفاقی که ترند شد، شخصیت تو هم باید دربارهاش نظر بده. ✅مثلاً: گرونی امتحانات هوش مصنوعی فوتبال فیلمهای جدید اتفاقات شبکههای اجتماعی مردم دوست دارند ببینن یک شخصیت انیمیشنی درباره اتفاقات واقعی چه نظری داره. #کسبوکار_پولساز #ai
👍1
✅بهترین فرمت ویدیو اولین ۳ ثانیه همه چیز را تعیین میکند. مثلاً: ❌ سلام بچهها... ✅ امروز فهمیدم من واقعی نیستم... یا ✅ امروز پلیس منو گرفت... یا ✅ امروز عاشق شدم... اینها باعث میشه مخاطب مکث کنه. #کسبوکار_پولساز #ai
❤1👍1
✅نکات مهمی که باید در ساخت سریالها درنظر بگیرید: 🟠تصاویر چه باشند؟ فقط عکس پرتره منتشر نکن. تصویر باید داستان داشته باشه. مثلاً: شخصیتت وسط مریخ شخصیتت در آینده شخصیتت در دوران هخامنشی شخصیتت در سال ۳۰۰۰ شخصیتت در شهرهای مختلف دنیا شخصیتت داخل بازی GTA شخصیتت داخل Minecraft شخصیتت کنار دایناسورها .... #کسبوکار_پولساز #ai
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @contentyabinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوست داری محتواها رو به کدوم سمت ببریم؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔸 آموزش تولید محتوا | کانتنتیاب🔸” (@contentyabinfo), 1,371 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/contentyabinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.