Поклонники «Теда Лассо» на месте? Вместе с премьерой нового сезона Nike выпустил новую форму Ричмонда. Ждем!🍿 @conceptfootball
❤🔥14👍4

Channel
@conceptfootball
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,757subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001977560357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @conceptfootball |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/conceptfootball |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 1,757 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 1,758 | -6 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 1,764 | -8 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 1,772 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 1,778 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 1,784 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 1,783 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 1,779 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 1,776 | +13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 1,763 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,765 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 1,766 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 1,767 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 1,768 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 1,768 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
122 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 60 | 49.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 24.6% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 24.6% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Поклонники «Теда Лассо» на месте? Вместе с премьерой нового сезона Nike выпустил новую форму Ричмонда. Ждем!🍿 @conceptfootball
❤🔥14👍4
Продолжая тему вратарских форм. PUMA тоже решила окунуться в 90-е. Яркие цвета и безумная графика – дизайнеры снова начали экспериментировать с формой для киперов. Правда, в отличие от adidas, PUMA решила тиражировать эту эстетику сразу на несколько клубов. Мысли? @conceptfootball
🔥10👍4👎1
Выездную «Ливерпуля» вы, возможно, уже оценили. Если еще нет — смотрите в комментариях (отсылка к 1994/95). Но главный герой этого дропа для меня — вратарская. Сам бывший кипер. Будучи канониром, такую нишевую я бы носил с большим удовольствием. Спасибо адидасу за то, что это не очередная болванка. @conceptfootball
❤🔥13👍5🔥3
Выездная форма Арсенала тоже получила отсылку — к культовой Bruised Banana образца 1991 года. Но вместо прямого переиздания дизайнеры предложили современную интерпретацию, сохранив связь с оригиналом. @conceptfootball
👍14❤🔥3😢1
Насыщенный зеленый и отсылка к сезону-2012/13. Пожалуй, одна из самых удачных выездных форм «Реала» за последние годы. Геометрический паттерн и трилистник делают комплект современным, сохраняя настроение классических джерси начала 2010-х. @conceptfootball
👍11🔥8
Спустя 12 лет на домашней футболке «Ромы» снова появилась культовая монограмма ASR. Минимум графики, два оттенка красного и классические желто-оранжевые акценты. Ни добавить, ни убавить – все по классике. Непривычно видеть только одно – логотип букмекерки на груди. @conceptfootball
👍13🔥1
Есть что-то особенное в синих выездных формах Манчестер Юнайтед. Новый комплект вдохновлен рекой Ирвелл, протекающей через Большой Манчестер. Глубокий синий, ненавязчивая текстура и множество мелких деталей – тот случай, когда форму хочется рассматривать. Ведь дьявол действительно кроется в деталях. Традиционно представили и кубковый шрифт. Кажется, он идеально вписывается в айдентику «красных дьяволов». @conceptf…
👍9🔥8
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @conceptfootball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Концепт × Футбол” (@conceptfootball), 1,757 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conceptfootball.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.