Channel
@coloringcodes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,239subscribers
+229 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003775243330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coloringcodes |
| Created | 21 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coloringcodes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 2,239 | +73 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 2,166 | +34 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 2,132 | +42 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 2,090 | +41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 2,049 | +35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 2,014 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 2,010 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 2,010 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 96.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hi everyone! 🤗 Many people aren’t sure what this button is for, but it’s actually the most important indicator of how useful a code was. When you leave a rating, you can rate any artwork you like (or don’t like). When you add an artwork to your Favorites, you usually remove it later once you’ve finished coloring it, because you no longer need the code. However, the “Mark as Used” button shows that you didn’t just…
❤16
Hello everyone! I’d like to remind you that if you’re uploading codes and find yourself constantly searching through the marker list to find your own markers, you can significantly reduce the list by specifying your markers in the settings. You can also enable a filter for those markers there. To select your markers, open Profile → Settings → Markers.
❤7👍3
Hi everyone! I want to give a small clarification about how to moderate submissions. If you see something strange — for example, an emoji instead of a code, or a “finished work” upload that contains a photo from the replies instead of an actual colored page — you can safely reject it. So far, cases like this have never been accepted, but I’ve noticed that when something suspicious appears, many people probably thi…
❤11
🎉 Big Update Tracker 📚 — You can now sort pages into completed and incomplete ones. By tapping the “Remaining” button, you’ll see all uncolored pages and can instantly open their color codes ✨ — Uploaded a photo to the tracker and decided to share your own code in the app? Now you can do it directly through the tracker 📸 — You can now edit information about coloring books that you uploaded yourself ✏️ — Added th…
❤11
Hello everyone👋 Questions often arise about the marker count in the drop-down list with codes or filters. As a reminder, this list contains the markers you enabled earlier in the process. To edit the list, open Profile - Settings - Markers
❤14
I forgot to add comments right away, so I'm writing a post so they can appear😁
❤9
Posted without readable text
This channel is for updates, important info, and staying in touch with you. If you have any questions or run into any issues, feel free to ask in the comments. To open our app, go to the bot and tap the “Open App” button. Choose the book and page you need, and there you’ll find different ready-made codes.
❤24
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @coloringcodes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 351,939 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ColoringCodes News” (@coloringcodes), 2,239 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coloringcodes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.