Channel
@cmtenis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,412subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001005577339 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cmtenis |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cmtenis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 2,412 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 2,410 | +6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 2,404 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 2,397 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 2,394 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 2,391 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 2,389 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,693 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 72.7% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 27.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
No se para. De madrugada viendo tenis, analizando lo de mañana. Suscritos han recibido las previas de mañana con tres pronósticos. No saldrán contenidos FREE para esta jornada, que os acostumbráis rápido. En el mensaje citado tenéis los packs disponibles.
🔔 Os recuerdo que podéis escucharos estos podcasts que son sabiduría no de inteligencia, sino de experiencia, hablando de manera coloquial con vosotros: - Limitaciones y liquidez - Hablo sobre los patrones que siguen las bookies para limitarte una cuenta. Por qué te han limitado a ti ganando mucho menos que a tu amigo que ha ganado miles de euros más. Qué hacer para evitarlo. - Tipsters y servicios de apuestas - Ha…
❤3
Es genial leer tanta gente que quiere tomarse esto en serio, que pregunta, que se informa. No somos un canal grande pero somos los mejores. He leído hoy mensajes muy guays de gente y experiencias. La pena es que muchas fueron de estafas, pero bueno. Es la pena de este mundo. Olvidarlo, aprender de ello, y hacer un reset para empezar de cero hacia arriba. Querer recuperar rápido es una cagada.
❤1
El pack de 250€ todo 2027 llevándote de regalo lo que resta de 2026 se quedará permanente. Ha tenido muy buena acogida, me encanta, y es una promoción TOP. La cosa es que cuanto antes te suscribas al pack, más contenidos tendrás al mismo precio, porque 2027 costará 250€ igualmente.
Cualquier duda que tengas, para suscribirte a L/P, promociones actuales, experiencias vividas... escríbeme en @cmtenisinfo. Lo importante, para mí, siempre será que la gente tenga una mentalidad sana. Yo por suerte tengo mas clientes de los que pensé que tendría nunca, y me ha ido bien, no busco clientes, si no pondría el pack mensual a 40 EUR en lugar de sacar packs que sale el mes a 15 EUR, no busco ganar mas diner…
🙊 Y si quieres leer experiencias de otros clientes AQUÍ puedes hacerlo. Porque a veces lo mejor es ver que otra gente lo hizo. Ya no solo en esto, en todo en la vida.
La mayoría de la gente ve mis estadísticas y piensa: "Ha ganado unas 300 unidades. Si yo tengo un bank de 1.000 €, habría ganado unos 3.000 €". Y no. Ese es probablemente el mayor error que comete quien empieza en esto. Las unidades no funcionan así porque el bank no debería quedarse siempre igual. Si haces las cosas bien, el bank crece y tu unidad también. Por eso siempre insisto tanto en la gestión del bank y por e…
👏3
Photo, posted without a caption
Os he dejado las previas enviadas a suscritos para la jornada de hoy en Montreal. No llevamos pronósticos en esos partidos. Muchas veces analizas todo, nada te convence, y no sale nada. En Toronto, en el WTA, sí llevamos un pronóstico. Si alguien está interesado, los packs son los siguientes. He vuelto a añadir el de 2027 porque todo el mundo me pregunta por ese pack, algo que en parte me alegra. Para que os hagáis u…
❤2
🇬🇧 Cameron Norrie (2.83) vs 🇦🇺 Alex De Minaur (1.43) Cameron Norrie y Alex De Minaur vuelven a cruzarse en un enfrentamiento que ya se ha convertido en un clásico del circuito, con un historial perfectamente igualado (3-3) y dos duelos repartidos este mismo año. El británico llega en un excelente momento, acumulando cinco victorias en sus últimos seis partidos y dejando muy buenas sensaciones en Montreal, donde ha e…
🇨🇿 Jiri Lehecka (1.54) vs 🇧🇪 Alexander Blockx (2.45) Jiri Lehecka parte como favorito, aunque Alexander Blockx llega con la confianza de haber firmado un gran verano y continúa confirmando el enorme potencial que se le presume. El checo dejó atrás su decepcionante eliminación en Los Cabos con una victoria muy convincente sobre su compatriota Kopriva en Montreal, imponiendo un porcentaje altísimo de primeros servicio…
🇪🇸 Rafael Jodar (1.69) vs 🇮🇹 Lorenzo Musetti (2.15) Rafael Jodar y Lorenzo Musetti volverán a verse las caras apenas una semana después de su duelo en Washington, donde el español sorprendió eliminando al italiano en tres sets. Sin embargo, ambos coinciden en que este será un partido completamente diferente. Jodar llega con mucha confianza tras superar una exigente gira norteamericana y volver a demostrar en Montrea…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cmtenis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CMTENIS - FREE” (@cmtenis), 2,412 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cmtenis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.