Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Clarnium Ecosystem

@clarnium

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,155subscribers

-373 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439167101
TypeChannel
Username@clarnium
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/clarnium

Growth

14,15514,52814,341.57 August 2026 — 14,528 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,516 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,455 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,406 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,339 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,263 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,180 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,155 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -373. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,099–14,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:1414,155-25
12 Aug 2026, 21:5514,180-83
11 Aug 2026, 21:2614,263-76
10 Aug 2026, 21:2214,339-67
9 Aug 2026, 17:5214,406-49
8 Aug 2026, 19:3514,455-61
7 Aug 2026, 18:5714,516-12
7 Aug 2026, 08:0114,528first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,267 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
93528.6%
👏76123.3%
👍68721.0%
🔥59018.1%
💯2698.23%
100.306%
🙏70.214%
🐳60.184%
🕊20.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
83
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 20 we hold a reading for · 70%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @clarnium. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 November 2025 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 17:28 UTC≈7,450 views319 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Test Sprint 2 wrap-up + reward decision — please read in full Test Sprint 2 is done, and it ran better than Test Sprint 1. These are still our test sprints — we're using them to stress the system before things go fully live. The new tracking is holding up well overall; the one issue we hit is that publication counts glitch under peak load. We're already fixing it. Now the hard part. A large share of participants th

🔥9181👏77👍70

4 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈13,100 views204 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 Sprint 02 is closing — and the team’s happy with it. The scoring did its job: high Twitter Score + real followers win, low-effort content doesn’t. We caught one gap — reach was exploitable. Auto-fix lands next sprint. This one, we fix by hand. → Sprint closed → Claim opens Monday afternoon → All weekend we’re reviewing 50+ tickets, zeroing every cheated post and clawing back the points We’d rather burn a weeken

82👏74👍31🔥15🐳1💯1

28 May 2026, 18:43 UTC≈10,300 views238 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸 Everyone who became an ambassador — check if you've got the Ambassador role in our Discord. That's the branch where all ambassadors get extra materials to make generating viral content easier. And that's also where we pay out USDC for growing your referral cabinet. Last sprint around 80 people didn't link their Discord to their Clarnium profile, and we couldn't give them the role. WE CHECK ROLES ONCE A DAY, D

👏10094🔥20👍184🐳2

28 May 2026, 14:16 UTC≈10,400 views415 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸 Sprint 01 is live. The second test sprint of the @Clarnium_io Ambassador Program. Now content quality matters more than quantity. What no longer earns: → Spam → Repetitive reposts → Copy-paste activity What scores now: → The reach your post pulls → How active the conversation under it is → Real engagement, not bot loops New multiplier: Verified accounts + Twitter Score boost every tracked action — not just p

149👏131👍72🔥63

22 May 2026, 13:11 UTC≈13,200 views212 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸 Quick update from the team We've been silent on socials for a while but not behind the scenes. The new Ambassador Program is built, tested, and ready to launch next week. Alongside it: a series of announcements we've been preparing for months. The next few weeks will be active. Stay close. 📗 Whitepaper 🌐 Website 🎮 Discord ✖️ Twitter

85👏82🔥24👍19🐳2

27 Apr 2026, 20:21 UTC≈10,900 views75 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸 Sprint 0 Ambassador Program is wrapping up. Thank you to everyone who participated in our test sprint! Let’s be honest: tech bugs and vulnerabilities in our points system made the program less fair than planned. We learned our lesson. Our mission is rewarding verified creators for quality content. ✅ What’s will changing: • Redesigned points logic (fairer & more transparent) • Points multiplier for verified cr

28👍21👏12🔥86

20 Apr 2026, 14:43 UTC≈12,000 views117 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸Ambassador Program Update We found and fixed all the bugs that appeared during the first days of Sprint 0. 🔧 Important: your Twitter account has been automatically unlinked. Please reconnect it to make sure everything works correctly going forward. We also know that many of you couldn't register over the weekend due to these issues. That's on us. So we've decided to extend Sprint by 3 extra days - giving everyon

👍42👏24💯2016🔥12🙏3

18 Apr 2026, 18:22 UTC≈9,260 views93 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚀 The Clarnium Ambassador Program is LIVE on Twitter! Sprint 0 - test launch. $5,000 prize pool. 7 days. Open to everyone. 👨‍💻 How it works: Create content about Clarnium → Mention @Clarnium_io → using the $CLAR tag → earn points → climb the leaderboard. Top 100 get rewards. The edge: your Twitter Score is a multiplier. Higher Score = more points per action. Real influence = real advantage. Bonus: your referral l

28👏22💯19👍16🔥8

14 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTC≈7,320 views138 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026

🚀 We’re excited to announce that the development and testing of our Ambassador Program are now fully complete. We’re officially launching tomorrow. Follow the link to learn how it works, what the conditions are, and how you can participate. https://clarnium.io/journal/ambassador-program This will be a short 7-day test sprint so stay ready. 📗 Whitepaper 🌐 Website 🎮 Discord ✖️ Twitter

👍42👏32💯2620🔥18

20 Mar 2026, 12:39 UTC≈10,600 views178 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Clarnium: Simplifying Web3 for Token Launches Launching a token is only the first step. The real challenge is building community, hype, and long-term value. Clarnium is building an ecosystem designed to solve this. In this video, Andrew Furman (CEO & Co-Founder) explains: • The vision behind Clarnium • How our ecosystem helps projects launch and scale tokens • Tools like Token Launcher, AI Agents and SocialFi m

💯49🔥45👍3330👏21

13 Mar 2026, 09:56 UTC≈9,510 views141 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Community update. We are preparing to launch the Clarnium Ambassador Program. Anyone with an X account will be able to participate by creating content and being active on X while promoting the Clarnium ecosystem and the CLAR token. • Sprints will last up to 2 weeks • Rewards include USDC (instant withdrawal) and CLAR tokens (vesting) Important: due to the release of this feature, all previously connected X acc

👍4233👏30🔥17💯15🙏4

2 Mar 2026, 17:16 UTC≈6,800 views127 reactions6 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

While everyone is feeling down about the market, our team is focused on improving the product and user experience, not posting just for the sake of posting. This week we released an update that includes: • Referral system in USDC • Daily streak extended from 90 to 180 days • Added a countdown timer for the daily streak reset • Added reward sections in the Userboard • Wallet display for token claims in the Vesting s

🔥4827👏24👍13💯12🕊2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @clarnium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 487,960 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Clarnium Ecosystem” (@clarnium), 14,155 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clarnium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.