10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,894–3,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 14:24
3,953
+5
27 Aug 2026, 19:34
3,948
+9
24 Aug 2026, 12:34
3,939
+9
21 Aug 2026, 02:48
3,930
+4
18 Aug 2026, 07:11
3,926
+6
14 Aug 2026, 20:55
3,920
+9
11 Aug 2026, 01:11
3,911
+8
8 Aug 2026, 07:11
3,903
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:33
3,902
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:27
3,902
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.35%
avg views ÷ 3,953 subscribers
Avg views / post
291
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (18 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,035
Reactions total
91
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 21 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
192
87.7%
🤝
12
5.48%
🙏
10
4.57%
👍
5
2.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/umXrw3LHV0c
👆 لینک مشاهده ویدئو کامل این جلسه
🍃 عنوان دوره:
طراحی سازه های بتن آرمه ۱
🧑🏫 مدرس: آقای دکتر مسعود حسین زاده اصل
جلسه ۲۲: شما پذیری متوسط و ویژه در تیرهای بتنی آرمه
مدت زمان: ۱ ساعت و ۳ دقیقه
برای مشاهده سایر جلسات به کانال تلگرام CivilTreee سر بزنید 🙏
یه چیز دیگه هم میگم و تمام 😊🙈
از اسم طراحی عملکردی نترسید، از اسم طراحی لرزه ای اصلا نترسید
شما همون دانش لیسانس رو که داشته باشید، با دونستون یک سری مباحث خیلی ساده از طراحی لرزه ای میتونید وارد بازار کار بشید و پول در بیارید. از اونجا به بعدش یه بحث دیگس که فعلا اینجا نمیشه مطرح کرد 😉
اهل دلهاش میدونن منظورم چیه، بقیه هم به مرور میفهمن
خیلی مخلصیم، وقتتون رو گرفتم
موفق باشید و از ندونستن نترسید
خیلی ها کاسبیش…
اگر هیچ کدوم رو هم ندیدین فدای سرتون، شما هیچ چیزی از بقیه کم ندارید و از آینده و ندونستن فعلا نترسید
سر فرصت هم به مباحث لرزه ای میرسیم، هم به طراحی عملکردی. آسیاب به نوبت
متاسفانه یا خوشبختانه، کسب علم و دانش تو مهندسی عمران یک آمپول (فلان دوره خاص، از فلان استاد، از فلان موسسه) نداره که بگم برید اون رو تهیه کنید و ببینید و دیگه تمام.
صبر و حوصله، انرژی و عشق زیاد میخواد که فقط با صرف زمان به دست میاد.
به نظرم حتی دیدن چهار پنج جلسه ابتدایی این دوره ها خیلی میتونه در کنار دیدن آموزشهای آقای دکتر حسین زاده بهتون دید بده و نگاهتون رو بازتر کنه
آقای دکتر حر خسروی خیلی ساده و راحت مباحث مقدماتی طراحی لرزه ای رو میگن و ساده میتونید ایشون رو دنبال کنید و انرژی زیادی ازتون نمیگیره
ولی اگر دوست دارید در کنار یاد گرفتن مباحث مقدماتی طراحی لرزه ای، با مقدمات طراحی عملکردی هم آشنا بشید و یه کم سر درد بگیرین، ۴ جلسه ابتدا…
با توجه به اینکه دیدن کامل همین جلسات وقت گیر هست، دوست ندارم ذهنتون رو به سمت دیگه ای ببرم و مثل خیلی دیگه از کانالهای تلگرامی حس ندونستن بهتون القا بکنم و باعث کاهش انگیزتون برای ادامه دیدن جلسات آقای دکتر حسین زاده بشم
ولی اگر میدونید فرصت کافی دارید، در کنار این آموزشها دیدن آموزشهای دو تا استاد دیگه رو بهتون توصیه میکنم (حتی فقط گوش دادن بهشون هم دید و نگاهتون رو به طراحی تغییر میده، بدون اینکه بخواین نوت بردا…
سلام و درود
یکی از مباحثی که تقریبا توی ۹۰ درصد دانشگاه ها حین تدریس سازهای بتن آرمه و سازههای فولادی در موردش صحبت نمیشه و همیشه یک جای خالی بزرگ برای دانشجویان باقی میمونه، مباحث مربوط به طراحی لرزه ای هست
از انتهای جلسه ۲۱ کلاس آقای دکتر حسین زاده ایشون این مبحث رو شروع کردن که شدیداً توصیه میکنم سه چهار جلسه آینده رو با دقت خیلی خیلی زیاد ببینید، چون جز مباحثی هست که توی اکثر دانشگاه ها تدریس نمیشه، ولی زمان…
https://youtu.be/81qmzof2Ha0
👆 لینک مشاهده ویدئو کامل این جلسه
🍃 عنوان دوره:
طراحی سازه های بتن آرمه ۱
🧑🏫 مدرس: آقای دکتر مسعود حسین زاده اصل
جلسه ۲۱: حل تست فصل برش در تیرهای بتنی آرمه
مدت زمان: ۵۴ دقیقه
برای مشاهده سایر جلسات به کانال تلگرام CivilTreee سر بزنید 🙏
https://youtu.be/F75ZdsUI-Ts
👆 لینک مشاهده ویدئو کامل این جلسه
🍃 عنوان دوره:
طراحی سازه های بتن آرمه ۱
🧑🏫 مدرس: آقای دکتر مسعود حسین زاده اصل
جلسه بیستم: ضوابط تکمیلی طراحی برشی تیرهای بتن آرمه
مدت زمان: ۱ ساعت و ۴ دقیقه
برای مشاهده سایر جلسات به کانال تلگرام CivilTreee سر بزنید 🙏
یه دوستی هست، هر وقت من یک پست جدید میذارم بلافاصله یه ❤️ میذارن
نمیدونم کدوم عزیزی هستی، ولی خواستم یه تشکر ویژه از شما بکنم و بدونید که حواسم هست 😊🌷🌱
https://youtu.be/-VghHsyVtos
👆 لینک مشاهده ویدئو کامل این جلسه
🍃 عنوان دوره:
طراحی سازه های بتن آرمه ۱
🧑🏫 مدرس: آقای دکتر مسعود حسین زاده اصل
جلسه نوزدهم: مقاطع بحرانی برش در تیرهای بتنی آرمه
مدت زمان: ۵۸ دقیقه
برای مشاهده سایر جلسات به کانال تلگرام CivilTreee سر بزنید 🙏
https://youtu.be/RcCKbRnpzOQ
👆 لینک مشاهده ویدئو کامل این جلسه
🍃 عنوان دوره:
طراحی سازه های بتن آرمه ۱
🧑🏫 مدرس: آقای دکتر مسعود حسین زاده اصل
جلسه هجدهم: مقاومت برشی خاموت ها در تیر بتنی
مدت زمان: ۵۷ دقیقه
برای مشاهده سایر جلسات به کانال تلگرام CivilTreee سر بزنید 🙏
https://youtu.be/2gRcM7TVc5A
👆 لینک مشاهده ویدئو کامل این جلسه
🍃 عنوان دوره:
طراحی سازه های بتن آرمه ۱
🧑🏫 مدرس: آقای دکتر مسعود حسین زاده اصل
جلسه هفدهم: مقاومت برشی بخش بتنی تیرها
مدت زمان: ۵۹ دقیقه
برای مشاهده سایر جلسات به کانال تلگرام CivilTreee سر بزنید 🙏
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @civiltreee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 546,159 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مهندسی عمران | سبزسازه @sabzsaze · 39,972 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Civil & Architecture @civil_arch · 82,277 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
CivilCa @civilca · 62,108 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
کانال مهندسین عمران @civilx · 43,207 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CivilTreee” (@civiltreee), 3,953 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/civiltreee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.