Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 跨境出海交流群

Supergroup

跨境出海交流群

@chuhaizhinanzhen1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,399members

-2,444 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

63 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003992341845
TypeSupergroup
Username@chuhaizhinanzhen1
Description专注 Telegram领域、社交媒体及海外流量增长服务,为个人、团队、频道主提供高效、稳定、专业的数字营销解决方案。期待于你的合作!
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 October 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held17
On Telegramt.me/chuhaizhinanzhen1

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4983,8432,170.56 August 2026 — 3,843 members7 August 2026 — 3,772 members11 August 2026 — 3,661 members14 August 2026 — 3,615 members17 August 2026 — 3,578 members20 August 2026 — 3,525 members23 August 2026 — 3,483 members26 August 2026 — 3,449 members29 August 2026 — 3,353 members1 September 2026 — 2,957 members5 September 2026 — 2,339 members11 September 2026 — 1,763 members14 September 2026 — 1,493 members18 September 2026 — 1,059 members27 September 2026 — 498 members7 October 2026 — 1,399 members8 October 2026 — 1,399 members1,3996 August 20268 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 62 days, net -2,444. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
8 Oct 2026, 00:421,399no change
7 Oct 2026, 21:141,399+901
27 Sept 2026, 15:59498-561
18 Sept 2026, 16:201,059-434
14 Sept 2026, 06:561,493-270
11 Sept 2026, 00:381,763-576
5 Sept 2026, 15:202,339-618
1 Sept 2026, 10:582,957-396
29 Aug 2026, 10:123,353-96
26 Aug 2026, 16:543,449-34
23 Aug 2026, 23:123,483-42
20 Aug 2026, 11:063,525-53
17 Aug 2026, 20:133,578-37
14 Aug 2026, 16:253,615-46
11 Aug 2026, 05:213,661-111
7 Aug 2026, 19:113,772-71
6 Aug 2026, 19:463,843first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“跨境出海交流群” (@chuhaizhinanzhen1), 1,399 members as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chuhaizhinanzhen1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.