Чай или кофе?
- Чай45%
- Кофе52%
- Оба мимо3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52986795966343805206❤4🤣4

Channel
@chtopoede_vldz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,531subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001803735460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chtopoede_vldz |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chtopoede_vldz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 4,531 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 4,540 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 4,535 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 4,537 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,837 |
| Reactions total | 532 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
532 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5298679596634380520 | 193 | 36.3% | |
| ❤ | 175 | 32.9% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 8.65% | |
| 🤩 | 41 | 7.71% | |
| 🤣 | 40 | 7.52% | |
| custom 5253496751133827133 | 20 | 3.76% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 3.20% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 532reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chtopoede_vldz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Чай или кофе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52986795966343805206❤4🤣4
Арбуз или дыня?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍5custom 52986795966343805205🤣2
Огурец или помидор?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52986795966343805205❤4🤩3
Бургер или шаурма?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52986795966343805205❤3🤩3
#РесторанныеНовости Тем временем на другом конце города произошло ресторанное закрытие / открытие. Закрылась бургерная TORO, а на ее месте уже красуется вывеска Шаурмания.
custom 52986795966343805209❤7custom 52534967511338271333
Ходят слухи, что в этом здании на Архонском кругу (между заправкой и Леруа) будет Вкусно - и точка. 💙ЧПЕ в VK 💬ЧПЕ в МАХ 📷ЧПЕ в запретграме
custom 529867959663438052010custom 52534967511338271337❤6
А давайте эту трофейную пачку кофе разыграем на канале! Бренд: JOY Bean Страна: Бразилия Разновидность: Желтый Бурбон Степень обжарки: Турка Оценка: 83,5 Вкус: фундук, шоколад, специи, цитрус Как обычно условия просты: 1. Подписаться на ЧПЕ 2. Нажать на кнопку "Участвую!" Итоги подведем 14 августа.
❤21👍6🤩3
На выходных автор без дела не сидел и сходил на лекцию о кофе, которую организовал бренд JOY Bean, а именно его основатель — Игорь Золоев. Причем еще в самом начале своего пути автор неоднократно слышал, что Игорь — один из сильнейших экспертов по кофе в Осетии. И чаще всего в его адрес звучала характеристика: «фанатик своего дела». А это, как по мне, высшая степень профессионального признания. Больше всего на лекц…
❤23🤩7🔥4
Автор уже месяц наблюдает за сезоном лисичек в топовых столичных ресторанах и пребывает в глубокой печали: который год этот сезонный тренд никак не доберётся до Владикавказа. Но свершилось! В ресторане 360 новый Шеф — Урузмаг Черчесов — запустил сезонное меню с рыженькими чертовками. Автор уже присмотрел жаркое с лисичками и копчёной сметаной. Помню, года два назад пробовала салат от Шефа с копчёной сметаной — и эт…
❤17🤩9👍3custom 52986795966343805203
Posted without readable text
custom 52986795966343805207❤6🔥3
Прошла ли мода на альтернативное молоко? По данным исследовательской компании Circana, в США продажи растительных напитков в натуральном выражении снижаются более чем на 5% ежегодно уже третий год подряд. Сильнее всего досталось миндальному молоку, замедлился рост и некогда главного любимчика кофеен — овсяного. При этом продажи обычных молочных продуктов продолжают расти. Похожие тенденции наблюдаются в Великобрит…
❤10custom 52986795966343805206custom 52534967511338271335
Японская пивоварня придумала бокал для пива, который поможет на утро избежать похмелья. Одна половина бокала предназначена для пива, вторая – для воды. Идея в том, чтобы снизить вызванное алкоголем обезвоживание. Если не чередовать напитки, бокал потеряет равновесие и опрокинется. Держим баланс 🍺🍺
🤣15custom 52986795966343805207❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @chtopoede_vldz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чай или кофе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Арбуз или дыня?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Огурец или помидор?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Бургер или шаурма?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А вы пьете пиво!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А у вас случались курьезные случаи в топовых заведениях?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,144,746 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что по еде? | Владикавказ | Рестораны | Кафе” (@chtopoede_vldz), 4,531 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chtopoede_vldz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.