Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STANDOFF 2

Channel

STANDOFF 2

@chillowx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

20,978subscribers

-335 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001631417386
TypeChannel
Username@chillowx
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 12 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chillowx

Growth

20,97821,31321,145.57 August 2026 — 21,313 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,299 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,275 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,248 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,238 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,206 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,184 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,156 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,123 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,101 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,080 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,055 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,030 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,010 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,978 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,928–21,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 11:0820,978-32
21 Aug 2026, 20:3921,010-20
20 Aug 2026, 19:2621,030-25
19 Aug 2026, 20:1221,055-25
18 Aug 2026, 17:0721,080-21
17 Aug 2026, 19:3621,101-22
16 Aug 2026, 17:2321,123-33
14 Aug 2026, 23:5621,156-28
13 Aug 2026, 14:1821,184-22
12 Aug 2026, 10:5821,206-32
11 Aug 2026, 08:0321,238-10
10 Aug 2026, 09:0021,248-27
9 Aug 2026, 09:5121,275-24
8 Aug 2026, 05:5821,299-14
7 Aug 2026, 08:4621,313first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6,287 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,50023.9%
1,44022.9%
👍1,26620.1%
🔥3555.65%
🐳3465.50%
🙏3124.96%
🤯1682.67%
👌911.45%
🙈821.30%
🫡821.30%
🎉811.29%
🏆731.16%
👏691.10%
😇661.05%
🍓480.763%
🤩450.716%
😱440.7%
🥰440.7%
😈390.62%
💘360.573%
6 further kinds1001.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2022 to 18 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chillowx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2022 to 18 November 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Nov 2024, 16:32 UTC≈11,700 views504 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Промокод на 5000 голды TMAMZJ9BBAWP Жми 👍 для нового промокода

👍45321💘13😎13🎉2🤩2

18 Nov 2024, 16:16 UTC≈11,800 views91 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Промокод на Dual Daggers “Jaws” - UTBJRW7DTUUW 👍

🔥35👍27💘13😍7😎4❤‍🔥2🤩21

18 Nov 2024, 16:15 UTC≈10,300 views25 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Промо 20000 Голды - UUXXD8LHH6K7 3 Активации !

👍165🤩4

18 Nov 2024, 14:24 UTC≈10,100 views26 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Промик 10000 Голды - QHKECQRATUQH

17👍9

18 Nov 2024, 11:36 UTC≈6,950 views20 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Промокод - B3WHJZ8DMD5Y

👍13🔥5🤩2

18 Nov 2024, 11:31 UTC≈6,820 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026

❤️ GDA3PWE8ATАB S8ZVBJ9D4RAВ PBUD7UGWCFD EGCFXHA4YАВM Пачка промокодов по 1 активации ❤️

👍145

18 Nov 2024, 11:29 UTC≈6,580 views15 reactionsread 23 August 2026

👍 ПРОМО - CFDFXGHA4MGD ❤️

👍13💘2

17 Nov 2024, 06:25 UTC≈6,780 views16 reactionsread 23 August 2026

❤️ ПРОМОКОД 5000 ГОЛДЫ - D7E8VNQ8GZAP 👍

9👍7

11 Nov 2024, 10:01 UTC≈7,490 views25 reactionsread 23 August 2026

❤️🔥НОВЫЙ ПРОМОКОД 👉 JTZXAFJSXGU2 (5 активаций)

👍14🔥63❤‍🔥2

11 Nov 2024, 10:00 UTC≈7,470 views17 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Промокод на 10000 Голды - HDOEKANXIS0

👍124😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chillowx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Oct 2023, 11:29 UTCAnonymous Poll25,300 voters approx.

ЧТО ИМЕННО ?

  1. ГОЛДУУУУ47%
  2. НОЖИИИ53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2022 to 18 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 168,573 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STANDOFF 2” (@chillowx), 20,978 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chillowx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.