Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cherry๐Ÿ’Bomb

Channel

Cherry๐Ÿ’Bomb

@cherrybomb969

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Cite this entry

3,627subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002454829001
TypeChannel
Username@cherrybomb969
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 8 March 2025โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cherrybomb969

Growth

3,6273,6533,6407 August 2026 โ€” 3,653 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 3,653 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 3,652 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 3,647 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 3,644 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 3,640 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 3,631 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 3,628 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 3,627 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 3,623โ€“3,657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 18:083,627-1
24 Aug 2026, 03:443,628-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:373,631-9
17 Aug 2026, 12:563,640-4
14 Aug 2026, 08:373,644-3
11 Aug 2026, 04:513,647-5
8 Aug 2026, 10:283,652-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:013,653no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:053,653first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

2,059 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ”ฅ81539.6%
โค70134.0%
๐Ÿ˜1155.59%
๐Ÿฅฐ1004.86%
๐Ÿ‘743.59%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ492.38%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ381.85%
๐ŸŒญ200.971%
๐Ÿพ200.971%
๐ŸŒ170.826%
๐Ÿ“150.729%
๐Ÿ’˜150.729%
๐Ÿ˜100.486%
๐Ÿ‘Œ80.389%
๐Ÿ†70.34%
๐Ÿ‘ป60.291%
๐Ÿ’‹60.291%
๐Ÿ’ฏ60.291%
๐ŸŒš50.243%
๐Ÿณ40.194%
12 further kinds281.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 2,059reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 7 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for ยท 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @cherrybomb969. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2025 to 7 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2025, 04:10 UTCโ‰ˆ10,500 views107 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

O N L I N E

๐Ÿ”ฅ65โค17๐Ÿ˜15๐ŸŒญ5๐Ÿ“3โšก1๐Ÿฅฐ1

11 May 2025, 16:04 UTCโ‰ˆ17,700 views178 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

โž–โž–โž–โž–โž–โž–

โค85๐Ÿ”ฅ47๐Ÿ˜ˆ15๐Ÿฅฐ12๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ˜4๐Ÿ‘Ž3๐Ÿ’‹3

21 Apr 2025, 18:53 UTCโ‰ˆ24,100 views175 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐™๐™š๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฏ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™˜๐™ž๐™ค ๐™™๐™š ๐™จ๐™š๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐Ÿฉต

๐Ÿ”ฅ97โค37๐Ÿฅฐ16๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ˜8๐Ÿ‘Œ3๐Ÿพ2๐Ÿ‘ป2

14 Apr 2025, 18:25 UTCโ‰ˆ24,200 views142 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’–

โค74๐Ÿ”ฅ35๐Ÿฅฐ13๐Ÿ˜8๐Ÿ˜ˆ4๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ“2๐Ÿพ2

10 Apr 2025, 15:13 UTCโ‰ˆ22,200 views146 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

๐™๐™š๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฏ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™˜๐™ž๐™ค ๐™™๐™š ๐™™รญ๐™– ๐Ÿ”ฅ

๐Ÿ”ฅ82โค31๐Ÿฅฐ12๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ˜6๐ŸŒš3๐Ÿ“3โšก1

1 Apr 2025, 18:48 UTCโ‰ˆ21,000 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Me parezco al stiker? ๐Ÿคฃ

  1. Si68%
  2. No16%
  3. Solo un poco16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

๐Ÿ˜10๐ŸŒญ3๐Ÿ‘ป2๐Ÿฅฐ2

1 Apr 2025, 18:47 UTCโ‰ˆ18,500 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

๐Ÿ˜ก

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ‘2โค1๐Ÿ†1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿฅฐ1

1 Apr 2025, 18:47 UTCโ‰ˆ18,400 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ˜ก

โค44๐Ÿ”ฅ22๐Ÿ˜11โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿ˜˜3๐ŸŒญ2๐Ÿฆ„2๐Ÿ‘1

28 Mar 2025, 16:49 UTCโ‰ˆ17,600 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐…๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ ๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ , ๐ช๐ฎ๐ž ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐ž๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐š ๐ก๐จ๐ฒ?

๐Ÿ”ฅ71โค21๐Ÿ˜11๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ˜ˆ5๐Ÿฅฐ3๐ŸŒš2๐Ÿพ2

25 Mar 2025, 19:39 UTCโ‰ˆ17,200 views138 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐™ƒ๐™–๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ฎ ๐™๐™ช๐™š๐™จ๐™™๐™–๐™ฎ ๐Ÿ’Ž

๐Ÿ”ฅ78โค25๐Ÿ˜13๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ’˜4๐ŸŒ3๐Ÿ“3๐Ÿ‘Œ3

22 Mar 2025, 22:36 UTCโ‰ˆ17,200 views125 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ( ๐Ÿ”ฅ)

๐Ÿ”ฅ85โค12โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿฅฐ6๐Ÿ’ฏ3๐Ÿ˜2๐ŸŒ1

21 Mar 2025, 20:03 UTCโ‰ˆ15,900 views86 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ’ž๐Ÿ’ž๐Ÿ’ž๐Ÿ’ž

โค49๐Ÿ”ฅ18๐Ÿฅฐ8๐Ÿ’˜5๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿ™ˆ2๐ŸŒญ1๐Ÿพ1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cherrybomb969. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Apr 2025, 18:48 UTCAnonymous Poll549 voters

Me parezco al stiker? ๐Ÿคฃ

  1. Si68%
  2. No16%
  3. Solo un poco16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 7 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œCherry๐Ÿ’Bombโ€ (@cherrybomb969), 3,627 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cherrybomb969.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.