Channel
@chemtrip
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
1,048subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001496820068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chemtrip |
| Created | 1 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chemtrip |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 20:42 | 1,048 | -1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 1,049 | -6 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 1,055 | -1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 1,056 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 1,055 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 1,056 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 1,055 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 1,057 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 1,058 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 1,059 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 1,060 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 1,059 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 1,061 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 1,060 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 1,060 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
273 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 271 | 99.3% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.733% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Жидкая форма яда, известная в Германии как синильная кислота, или Blausäure, — крайне летучее вещество с температурой кипения 26 градусов по Цельсию и тонким ароматом цветов миндаля, сладким с горчинкой. Не все различают этот запах, поскольку за его распознавание отвечает особый ген, которого нет у 40% людей. В результате такого каприза эволюции очень вероятно, что большинство узников Освенцима, Майданека и Маутхаузе…
👍6
С Днем Химика!
👍22
У вас работает телега?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍2
Ну что, химики, с Новым Годом вас!
👍26
Нобелевская премия в области химии присуждена Сусуму Китагаве, Ричарду Робсону и Омару М. Яги «за разработку металлорганических структур»
👍17
Существует такой синдром, как бромизм. Возникает в результате длительного употребления солей брома, типа бромида калия/натрия/лития. И раньше из-за этого заболевания в психиатрические лечебницы попадало от 5 до 10% пациентов. И на днях читаю забавный инцидент, произошедший в штатах с 60-ти летним биохакером, который по совету чатгпт решил заменить обычную поваренную соль на бромид натрия. В итоге, он попал в дурку, т…
👍30
С утра попалась вроде как любопытная статья: https://nplus1.ru/news/2025/06/30/stirring-issues С одной стороны, вроде бы выводы и без того очевидные, но окей
👍15
У химиков есть свой «тик-ток», ну, почти — жмяк На самом деле любопытный ресурс с инфографиками, можно залипать часами
👍8
Я вспомнил очень ироничную историю: у меня на курсе давно учился иранец. И когда все выбирали темы курсовых работ, то его выбор пал на тему «обогащение урана»
👍26
Удивительная новость. Если нержавейка 304 или 316, то маловероятно, оно безопасно. Но вот в дешевом говне (особенно в ЮВА – Тайвань там рядом) при покрытии или пайке могли быть и свинец, и кадмий, и даже мышьяк. Да и то, это надо иметь хронические проблемы и пить сутками лимонады, кофе с привкусом металлов из одной и той же термокружки. Но сложно не заметить перед отсроченным летальным исходом проблемы с ЦНС, почкам…
👍21
Сегодня приснился максимально странный сон: я оказался в небольшой советской лабе, ко мне подошла молодая девушка в халате, которую я воспринимал, как старшую коллегу. И говорит: «у нас есть письма, которые писались чернилами, нужно определить количественно нитраты в этих чернилах». Причем именно в контексте этих писем
👍22
Вы отрицаете абиогенез?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @chemtrip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У вас работает телега?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы отрицаете абиогенез?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2025 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Химическая экспедиция” (@chemtrip), 1,048 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemtrip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.