Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شبکه آرایش

Channel

شبکه آرایش

@chehrehsazanir

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,084subscribers

-85 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001004743666
TypeChannel
Username@chehrehsazanir
Descriptionتعرفه تبلیغات در بزرگترین کانال آرایشی تلگرام:👇 https://telegram.me/joinchat/AAAAAEBQxHsr1WwczaYuTw @arayeshads رزرو تبلیغات @chehrehad پرسش و پاسخ آرایشی در اینستاگرام ما👇 https://instagram.com/arayesh_tv
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chehrehsazanir

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,08413,16913,126.55 August 2026 — 13,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,167 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,167 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,166 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,163 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,161 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,155 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,154 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,152 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,140 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,133 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,129 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,126 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,122 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,119 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,114 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,109 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,103 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,099 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,098 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,091 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,090 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,084 subscribers5 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,071–13,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:3813,084-6
29 Aug 2026, 06:5313,090-1
28 Aug 2026, 06:3813,091-7
27 Aug 2026, 06:1213,098-1
25 Aug 2026, 06:1213,099-4
24 Aug 2026, 06:0213,103-6
22 Aug 2026, 10:4513,109-5
21 Aug 2026, 01:0813,114-5
20 Aug 2026, 00:3213,119-3
18 Aug 2026, 21:4613,122-4
17 Aug 2026, 20:5413,126-3
16 Aug 2026, 21:5813,129-4
15 Aug 2026, 15:5713,133-7
14 Aug 2026, 06:0713,140-12
12 Aug 2026, 20:4513,152-2
11 Aug 2026, 18:2113,154-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:3713,155-6
9 Aug 2026, 23:3513,161-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:4113,163-3
6 Aug 2026, 22:5213,166first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,700
Videos
3,580
Links
1,770

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 41s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7450.0%
4731.8%
🔥117.43%
👎85.41%
👏64.05%
😁10.676%
🤔10.676%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 17 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Mar 2025, 19:41 UTC≈4,240 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

میکاپ اقتصادی در سفرهای ایام عید🥰 @chehrehsazanir

8👎2

16 Mar 2025, 20:34 UTC≈4,150 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

با یه کلیپس موهاتو خودت استایل کن❤️ @chehrehsazanir

7👏2👎1

1 Mar 2025, 21:36 UTC≈4,190 views6 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

مدل مو زیبا و جذاب @chehrehsazanir

🔥3👏2👍1

22 Feb 2025, 19:55 UTC≈4,560 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

بافت مو جذاب @chehrehsazanir

👍4

20 Feb 2025, 21:21 UTC≈3,660 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

انواع خط چشم که استایلت رو تغییر میده🥰 #خط_چشم @chehrehsazanir

👍43

19 Feb 2025, 16:26 UTC≈3,050 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

قشنگ‌ترین مدل کانتور بینی😍 @chehrehsazanir

👍7👎31

18 Feb 2025, 09:11 UTC≈2,710 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

محاله این میکاپ به کسی نیاد🥰 @chehrehsazanir

👍7🔥2

17 Feb 2025, 23:23 UTC≈2,700 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ - مدل‌موبرای‌موفرفری‌ها🩵🛼 @chehrehsazanir

8👍1😁1

16 Feb 2025, 12:26 UTC≈2,760 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

آموزش میکاپ ۵ میلیونی🥰 @chehrehsazanir

🔥6👍4

15 Feb 2025, 14:05 UTC≈2,510 views6 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

مدل مو شیک و جذاب @chehrehsazanir

6

12 Feb 2025, 23:37 UTC≈2,790 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

با این روش خط چشمتو راحت میکشی🥰 @chehrehsazanir

👍61

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chehrehsazanir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 374,821 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شبکه آرایش” (@chehrehsazanir), 13,084 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chehrehsazanir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.