Channel
@chatterlinkk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,009subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002349908566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chatterlinkk |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chatterlinkk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 3,009 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 3,008 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 3,004 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 3,001 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 3,005 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 3,000 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,186 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
98 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 45 | 45.9% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 29.6% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 7.14% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 6.12% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.08% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 $70,000+ IN THE LAST 30 DAYS for 1 Chatterlinkk partner Another huge result delivered by Chatterlinkk! Have a listen to what Chatterlinkk co-founder Kyle, has to say about this transformation and how we took this model from under $9k a month to over $70k. This didn't happen through luck. It came from months of building relationships, retaining high-value fans, and having a team that knows how to maximise every o…
🔥4❤2
With AI models becoming increasingly easy to identify across major platforms, the smartest operators aren't relying on a single income stream anymore. They're diversifying onto OF with Chatterlinkk to protect their business and maximise revenue. Running both simultaneously. Another huge result for one of our partners. Before working with us, this account wasn't even making $1,000/month on OF. The creator had been …
❤6🔥2🏆1
Insane turnaround for 1 Chatterlinkk partner🚀 After hovering around the $2,000–$4,000/month mark, this model partnered with Chatterlinkk... and boom. Monthly earnings increased by over $27,000, finishing the month at $32,000+. 📈 With the industry maintaining right now and not really booming, we see so many creators and managers give up when they hit obstacles. They don't have the experience or systems to overcome …
🔥5❤2👏2
Massive month for one of our OF partners Over £23,000 in the last 30 days and a huge increase in earnings compared to where the account started. Most importantly, the client is absolutely delighted with the results, and that's what matters most to us. Most people know us for our Fanvue results because that's what we've shared publicly the most over the last few years. But if you know us, you know we have been work…
🔥4👏2❤1💯1
INSANE £60K+ THIS MONTH FOR 1 CHATTERLINKK PARTNER🚀🔥 At Chatterlinkk, this is what we do. It doesn’t matter if it’s Q1, the middle of summer, or the Christmas Q4 rush… we print all year round. This creator came to us struggling to break £5K/month. Now we’re consistently hitting £60K+ through mastering chatting, sales strategy, and retention at Chatterlinkk. We’ve been doing this longer than anyone, and we’re sti…
🔥5❤4👏1
One of the biggest parts of managing a creator's account is knowing how to handle difficult conversations professionally while keeping your account fully aligned with platform TOS. This creator previously had a bad experience with another agency, where conversations about meeting subscribers ultimately led to their old account being banned. Since joining Chatterlinkk, they've had complete peace of mind knowing thei…
🔥7❤2👌1
ChatterLinkk - The #1 Chatting & Management Agency pinned a photo
Look at this for a turnaround!💥 $3k made in the 30 days before joining us… Then they partnered with Chatterlinkk, $16k in the last 30 days with Chatterlinkk. And here’s the crazy part… We’re only halfway through the month. At the current pace, we’re on track for a $30k+ month As always, we have full screen recordings to verify every result. If you’re stuck around $3k/month and can’t seem to break through that …
🔥5❤3💯2🏆1👍1
$141,000 in 1 month for 1 Chatterlinkk partner Summer is where we thrive☀️ Don’t spend your summer sat indoors chatting yourself or watching a bad agency slowly ruin your account. Whilst others make excuses and blame the “slow season,” we still scale creators every single day. Last summer, we generated $141,000 in a single month for this 1 model🚀 Don’t write off summer. Dominate it with Chatterlinkk. 🔥
🔥7🤩3🏆2❤1
HUGE SUCCESS for 1 of our Chatterlinkk partners 🚀 They’ve just hit their first $40k month. When they joined us, the target was $10k per month. Since then, we’ve gone on to smash $20k, $30k, and now $40k months together, with $50k months now firmly in sight. This is the benefit of working with a serious team that is genuinely dedicated to getting you results. Even when traffic is lower, WE GET RESULTS! With Chatt…
🔥4🏆2👏2❤1
🚨 IMPORTANT UPDATE – STARTERLINKK APPLICATIONS ARE NOW OPEN FULL-TIME🚨 We’ve officially removed the old intake window system at Starterlinkk. Previously, applications only opened for a 4-day window at a time. That meant if you missed the window, you had to wait for the next one. That’s no longer the case. From now on, you can join whenever you’re ready, there’s no need to wait for the next opening, no need to wai…
❤7👍3🔥2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @chatterlinkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 157,859 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChatterLinkk - The #1 Chatting & Management Agency” (@chatterlinkk), 3,009 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chatterlinkk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.