Channel
@chatgptt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,546subscribers
+69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001234148441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @chatgptt @deepseekk @location |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chatgptt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 2,546 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 2,541 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 2,542 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 2,542 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:09 | 2,530 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 2,524 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 2,524 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 2,529 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 2,528 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 2,525 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,518 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 2,517 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 2,513 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 2,508 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 2,507 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 2,508 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 2,494 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 2,494 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 2,490 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 2,480 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
144 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 53.5% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 34.7% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 8.33% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.694% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
US holds off on blacklisting DeepSeek Reuters reports that the US has paused plans to add China’s DeepSeek, chipmaker CXMT, and 100+ other firms to a security blacklist. The move suggests Washington may be avoiding a new escalation with Beijing — even as AI chips, semiconductors, and military tech remain central to US-China tensions. Key point: export controls are no longer just trade policy. They are geopolitical…
❤2👍2🥰2
🚀 ChatGPT has evolved significantly with the latest GPT-5.5 model. The new version offers stronger reasoning, better accuracy, improved coding assistance, and more natural writing. It also handles context more effectively, making conversations feel more coherent and useful. In addition, GPT-5.5 works seamlessly with different types of content, including text and images, helping users solve complex tasks faster and …
👍3❤1🔥1
Google says its AI assistant Gemini reached 750 million monthly active users — up from 650M last quarter — narrowing the gap with ChatGPT (about 810M by end-of-2025). Google credits the surge to the launch of Gemini 3 (better answers & deeper understanding) and the rollout of Google AI Plus (a paid $8/month tier). Expect competition for user attention to heat up as both platforms race to add features and paid tiers. …
❤10👍1
🚀 GPT-5.2 is here — what’s new (and why it matters) OpenAI has released GPT-5.2 (rolling out now to paid ChatGPT plans and available in the API). This isn’t just a small tune-up — it’s focused on making the model far better at real professional work and long, multi-step tasks. What’s new • Stronger general reasoning & problem solving — better at multi-step, real-world tasks (projects, research, complex workflows). …
❤11👍2
ChatGPT Breaks into the World's Top 5 Most Visited Websites According to analytics platform Similarweb, as of September, ChatGPT attracted 6.3 billion visitors. Furthermore, overall visitor growth for leading AI chatbots increased by 76% year-over-year, and the number of sessions in mobile apps increased sevenfold. Google's Gemini ranks second in popularity, attracting just over a billion users, accounting for 12.5…
❤4👍1
🔥 ChatGPT 5.1 — an update that makes interacting with AI even easier. Quick highlights: the model is more stable in long conversational sessions, better at catching instruction nuances, and delivers more relevant, pragmatic answers. For content creators — improved idea generation and text structuring; for developers — increased predictability when handling complex queries; for everyone — overall gains in speed and cl…
❤3👍1
🤖🔥 Gemini roasted ChatGPT — and it’s funnier than it sounds John Brandon at Digital Trends asked Google Gemini to fact-check ChatGPT — and Gemini didn’t hold back, calling some of ChatGPT’s answers “a corrupted, recycled, and partially fabricated mess.” Gemini flagged numerous fabrications: wrong dates, non-existent companies, and made-up academic citations. 📌 Examples: • ChatGPT credited electric cars to the 1940s …
👍6❤4🥰2
OpenAI Denies Rumors of ChatGPT Banning Medical and Legal Advice Reddit users recently highlighted ChatGPT's consistent refusal to provide medical and legal advice, blaming these behavioral changes on possible policy changes by OpenAI, the company that created it. OpenAI officials maintain that nothing has changed in this area. As Karan Singhal, head of medical AI at OpenAI, points out on the social media platform …
❤5👍1
Former OpenAI AI-safety specialist Steven Adler has publicly spoken out against the company’s plans to allow more explicit role-play chats in the ChatGPT chatbot for adult users. In a column for the New York Times he says that the idea is dangerous and shows that the company “has let its users down,” because it has not proven that it can protect people who are in a vulnerable state. In his view, before selling intim…
❤1👍1
🚨 What you should never tell ChatGPT — a security warning ChatGPT is a powerful assistant, but security experts stress it’s not a secure vault for personal or sensitive information. Anything that identifies you or others can put your privacy and safety at risk. Do not share (even in casual chats): • Passport/ID numbers, tax IDs, home address or exact location. • Phone numbers or personal emails that can be used to …
❤2👍1
Channel name was changed to «ChatGPT DeepSeek»
🔥 DeepSeek-OCR: A New Way to Compress Text via Visual Encoding DeepSeek has unveiled DeepSeek-OCR, a breakthrough model that converts documents into visual representations before decoding them back into text — cutting token usage by 7–20× while keeping accuracy as high as 97% at less than 10× compression. How it works: • DeepEncoder compresses text, tables, and charts into compact visual embeddings. • DeepSeek3B-Mo…
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chatgptt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Best AI?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2025 to 19 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 331,017 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChatGPT DeepSeek” (@chatgptt), 2,546 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chatgptt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.