👋 野寻 · 重庆 网络大神招募令 👋 🍑 诚邀各位网络大神加入野寻 · 武汉! 只要你有朋友、有资源、有人脉,就能把它变成收益! 邀请越多,奖励越高,没有时间限制,什么时候攒够什么时候兑换! 🍑 邀请奖励 1️⃣邀请10位 —— 奖励 1️⃣0️⃣ CNY 2️⃣邀请20位 —— 奖励 2️⃣5️⃣ CNY 3️⃣邀请50位 —— 奖励 1️⃣5️⃣0️⃣ CNY 🏆邀请120位 —— 奖励 5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ CNY 🍑 成功邀请老师上榜 🥰 即可额外获得 5️⃣0️⃣CNY 奖励 😃 活动规则 🟢 学生交流群 发送 邀请 获取邀请链接 🟢 无时间限制,自由累积邀请人数 🟢 达到任意档位即可申请兑换奖励 🟢 每次兑换完成后,邀请数据将重新清零,开始下一轮累计 🟢 可重复参与,多邀多得,上不封顶! 📱 野寻瑜瓷 @chase_yc 📱 无法联系 @chase_cy_bot

Channel
野寻·重庆活动公告
@chaseqc_hdgg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,035subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 11 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004397306641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chaseqc_hdgg |
| Created | 23 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chaseqc_hdgg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 15:06 | 5,035 | +4 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 11:22 | 5,031 | no change |
| 11 Nov 2026, 10:47 | 5,031 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 23 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.08%
- avg views ÷ 5,035 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 105
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (23 October 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 314 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (75.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💸积分兑换福利 😆 重庆学生交流群 签到发言可获得积分,每人每天最高获得50积分,500积分可以兑换50现金,1000积分可兑换100现金,1800积分可兑换200现金,兑换完成联系 瑜瓷 返现 快快参与起来吧! ➡️ 活动公告
🍑 野寻.重庆福利 🎁野寻招募令 🎁超级现金福利活动 即日起在野寻消费满2000起加一次作业好评可进入内部福利群,解锁(明星丶女优丶网红丶处女等资源) 📱野寻瑜瓷 @chase_yc 📱无法联系 @chase_cy_bot
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @chaseqc_hdgg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“野寻·重庆活动公告” (@chaseqc_hdgg), 5,035 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaseqc_hdgg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.