Channel
@changshadian
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,040subscribers
+82 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002697379869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @changshadian |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/changshadian |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 9,040 | +88 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 8,952 | +14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 8,938 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 8,958 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (25 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 55,826 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 47.4% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ 抽奖说明： ———长沙电报《周五五折活动》——— 1，感谢98会所赞助 五折券两张，关注98王也 @cswy6 2, 感谢94小红赞助 五折券两张，关注小红 @ck916 3，感谢私影MMK-柚子 赞助 五折券两张 关注 @as100897 4，指定个人老师五折券一张 关注狗仔队福利 @changshadian 5，感谢94小红赞助 八折券 5张 关注小红 @ck916 ————————————————— 抽奖规则: 1, 关注 长沙电报【公开群】 @changshaDBQ （进不去的联系解除封印，群管管理员 @wodedianbaoshuangBOT ） 2，在长沙电报【公开群】 发送：长沙电报周五五折活动 3，抽中的幸运儿可以找群管 @wodedianbaoshuangBOT 领取验证码 4，抽奖结果公布时间为 2026.8.28 .17:00 公布结果 点这里👉 @chan…
❤2👀1👍1
🎀【花名】:#索菲娅 📍【区域 】: #长沙 #雨花区 💦【费用】: 1500p 2000pp 🌸【罩杯】:36D 🔥【身高】：172 50kg 🔥【年龄】：24 🚀【联系】: @suofeiyacsy 📮【服务】:洗澡调情 裸吹 舌吻kiss 69 热情主动 听话配合 身高172体重100胸围36D 肤白貌美气质优雅年龄24 来自阿塞拜疆会中文（姐妹花） 中文一般可以简单沟通交流 素质约会 一千五1次60min 两千元②次90min 自己有房间也可以上门外出 上门需要先付车费以免恶作剧 约会流程有洗澡调情口交做爱 可接受69可丝袜情趣 可 kiss可双飞互动 （兼职赚零花钱，不会专业服务）
❤1🔥1
这是宣战书了看来 教主在长沙蓝钻亲自看到过，就是几个领队带一群妹子，不跳舞，只坐台 长沙30分钟，费率110，妹子得100，领队得10块，基本就这个比例 之前听说长沙领队被打了，有人说现在成都的领队就有长沙那边过来的 这几个领队也是憨批➕头铁 真以为帽子是摆设
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1👀1
雨花区小尾巴视频认证 @xiaoweiba0088
👀1
丁雯雯视频认证 @Dwenwen88
❤2🔥1
小甜心视频认证 @j455444
🎉1
白鹭老师，真人上榜视频认证。狼友放心冲 @bl123cc
👀1👏1
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号：H178563954515 🎰 长沙电报周五五折活动 16. 艾伦 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 17. 骑上我的野摩托 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 18. 花无缺 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 19. Veggie锅底 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 20. 干脆面 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 祝大家心想事成好运连连！ (2/2)
👍1
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号：H178563954515 🎰 长沙电报周五五折活动 💁 参与情况：676达标 / 695报名 🎅 联系领奖：妩媚娘 1. 田地专家 奖品：小红会所5折券 2. 信长 奖品：小红会所8折券 3. 逸散 奖品：小红会所8折券 4. 词穷 诗散 奖品：小红会所8折券 5. 風浪越大魚越貴 奖品：小红会所8折券 6. ROI wen 奖品：小红会所8折券 7. 如果那天 我是我 奖品：笙笙老师5折券 8. 割鸡柯基 奖品：沐沐老师5折券 9. 喂猪刺客 奖品：雪儿老师5折券 10. 1 2 奖品：紫韵老师5折券 11. 谢幕曲 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 12. 美式大拉花 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 13. 一壶浊酒 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 14. :hxu 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 15. Efcfj Jgjb... 奖品：狗仔队芙蓉王（红包） 祝大家心想事成好运连连！ (
长沙电报周五五折活动 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： ———长沙电报《周五五折活动》——— 1，感谢雪儿老师赞助 五折券一张，关注雪儿老师 @hx07089 2, 感谢紫韵老师赞助 五折券一张，关注紫韵老师 @tt66770123 3，感谢小红会所 赞助 五折券1张 八折券5张 关注小红会所频道 @xiaoh99 4，狗仔队赞助 芙蓉王*10份 (关注狗仔队 领福利 @changshadian) 5，感谢笙笙老师赞助五折券1张，关注笙笙 @guifei6434 6，感谢沐沐老师赞助五折券1张 ， 关注沐沐老师 @mumu6359 ————————————————— 抽奖规则: 1, 关注 长沙电报【公开群】 @changshaDBQ （进不去的联系解除封印，群管管理员 @wodedianbaoshuangBOT ） 2，在长沙电报【公开群】 发送：长沙电报周五五折活动 3，抽中的幸运儿可以找群管 …
昨天九大门派围攻光明顶，九个地区出警打击金融犯罪，从事金融犯罪的要注意了，最近严打！
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @changshadian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 111,796 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“长沙狗仔队_吃瓜领福利” (@changshadian), 9,040 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/changshadian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.